Andrew C
You know what's funny?
Fantasyland concept art included Pixie Hollow if that tells you anything... ended up being the circus carnival junk
well...it also did not include a Mine train so it can work both ways...sometimes...
Fantasyland concept art included Pixie Hollow if that tells you anything... ended up being the circus carnival junk
See Hyperion Wharf.Fantasyland was the most dramatic change between original concept art and final product that I can remember. It was originally going to have two interactive princess M&G's which were replaced with the Mine Ride, and a Pixie Hollow area over where Storybook Circus is, but that was eliminated and the whole area changed to Storybook Circus.
Fantasyland was the most dramatic change between original concept art and final product that I can remember. It was originally going to have two interactive princess M&G's which were replaced with the Mine Ride, and a Pixie Hollow area over where Storybook Circus is, but that was eliminated and the whole area changed to Storybook Circus.
Looks like we need to take these concepts with a grain of salt. As excited as we get on these boards, they set us up for disappointment. Which is ironic, because those on these boards really should be amazed with results that over-deliver on the original promise. From what I hear Frozenstrom did that, NFL did not. Not that initial concepts should underwhelm casual and passionate fans, but if there are going to be changes, they need to be for the better otherwise they are playing with fire. But again, if the past is a reference, Disney doesn't mind - see Disney America, Mt Fuji, and many other publicly "promised" projects.
Hmmm, you're right. I kinda boycot parks not Disney so I'm not sure of Uni's practice, but it's sounds super logical. Seems like a more successful practice as well. It's like "don't look behind the curtain" as anticipation builds. Anyway, this Zebra (disney) ain't changing their stripes.There is something to be said for Universal's practice of rarely releasing concept art until well into construction.
Hmmm, you're right. I kinda boycot parks not Disney so I'm not sure of Uni's practice, but it's sounds super logical. Seems like a more successful practice as well. It's like "don't look behind the curtain" as anticipation builds. Anyway, this Zebra (disney) ain't changing their stripes.
PS, I enjoy your posts @danlb_2000, and of course your avatar. Honored to get into convo with you.
This. I used to be super Disney biased but when my cousin took me to Harry Potter World I had an amazing time! Now here I am anxiosly awaiting Volcano Bay.Not to get off on a tangent but you should re-consider your boycott, you might be missing out on things you might really enjoy.
Ha! A few years ago my company had flew us (from CT) to IOA, I was very impressed with the Potterland and Whoville in terms of design, detail and execution. Rides were so so to me. Too bad I couldn't display my appreciation as I was playing the Disney-snob card the whole trip. However, I do hear that their crowd control/efficiency and other areas of detail aren't to Disney standards. Not fanboying this, just saying!Not to get off on a tangent but you should re-consider your boycott, you might be missing out on things you might really enjoy.
I agree... I'm surprised Disney hasn't gone this route. Build and let people speculate and build excitement wondering... HOWEVER the reason they probably HAD TO release concept art was to get people excited now because the parks have been so (fill in the blank)ing stagnant for awhileThere is something to be said for Universal's practice of rarely releasing concept art until well into construction.
I agree... I'm surprised Disney hasn't gone this route. Build and let people speculate and build excitement wondering... HOWEVER the reason they probably HAD TO release concept art was to get people excited now because the parks have been so (fill in the blank)ing stagnant for awhile
Disney's management has driven me to Universal. Orlando was always Disney to me, but not anymore.Hmmm, you're right. I kinda boycot parks not Disney so I'm not sure of Uni's practice, but it's sounds super logical. Seems like a more successful practice as well. It's like "don't look behind the curtain" as anticipation builds. Anyway, this Zebra (disney) ain't changing their stripes.
PS, I enjoy your posts @danlb_2000, and of course your avatar. Honored to get into convo with you.
Disney's management has driven me to Universal. Orlando was always Disney to me, but not anymore.
Indeed.Its OK to prefer Disney above other theme park experiences, but before you can, you actually have to experience the other parks so you have a frame of reference. At least, if you want to have your opinions taken with any sense of credibility.
I'd like to recap (245 pages in) for those just joining. The latest in TSL/HS, please correct as I don't want to spread false rumors, just trying to do a public service:
(Bold comments by me, as things stand today)
- In TSL: Slinky will either be reduced further or removed. A Soldier Parachute ride was brought up as a replacement (lame carnival ride) along with a few other "rides" in order to provide a false sense in the number of overall attractions. No
- GMR is still being replaced with Mickey Yes
- Animation still needs to be addressed Yes
- Echo is cool Looks like it
- Sci Fi cafe is safe Looks like it
- Muppets Courtyard is safe and will have a glorious entrance Yes
- TSL is for kids, SWL is for thrill seeker (more so)
- The end of Hollywood BLVD, near/at RnRC will become a loop not a deadened No
- Monstropolus seems to be the most likely next announcement/addition. Land or just ride is conjecture. No
- Pixar build out is controversial here. Some want a land (no indication from Diz), some take the Pixar brand element out and let those IP's live across WDW as Disney pick and play franchises.
Thanks Martin, Regarding the Monstropolous bullett I saw enough scuttle in the thread to add it in the list. Noted (and saddend). I also though there was speculation about the layout changing to a more traditional Disney layout (no dead ends at least). Again, Noted. Thank you for keeping us in line!(Bold comments by me, as things stand today)
- In TSL: Slinky will either be reduced further or removed. A Soldier Parachute ride was brought up as a replacement (lame carnival ride) along with a few other "rides" in order to provide a false sense in the number of overall attractions. No
- GMR is still being replaced with Mickey Yes
- Animation still needs to be addressed Yes
- Echo is cool Looks like it
- Sci Fi cafe is safe Looks like it
- Muppets Courtyard is safe and will have a glorious entrance Yes
- TSL is for kids, SWL is for thrill seeker (more so)
- The end of Hollywood BLVD, near/at RnRC will become a loop not a deadened No
- Monstropolus seems to be the most likely next announcement/addition. Land or just ride is conjecture. No
- Pixar build out is controversial here. Some want a land (no indication from Diz), some take the Pixar brand element out and let those IP's live across WDW as Disney pick and play franchises.
I am too. I used to be the biggest Disney advocate back in the 90's.Sorry to hear that. Maybe that's just the Florida dynamic. For me, Magic Mountain is a literal 10 minute drive from my house. Universal is 20-25 (on a good traffic day). Disney on average is anywhere from 1-2 hours, but I will always hands-down choose Disney first.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.