flynnibus
Premium Member
What's irrational is expecting that the continuity plan must be what you want it to be and retroactively avoid the circumstances we saw last week. You can start bringing that up after the third time this happens. Then it would begin to have some small bit of relevance. But watch - the next time the same failures occur, I bet Disney will have an improved plan for dealing with it, because that's how things work in the real world.
You act like this is some corner case that was unlikely to foresee. It’s bloody simple... it’s the admission system... you simply say “in what ways can it fail and impact other things?”. The most obvious first condition you evaluate is “it’s not there/dead/off”... what do we do?
You say “what does this thing do for us? Ok, what happens if that is not working, then what?”
You act like this is some 5 level intermixed condition that is hard to foresee. No it’s not... it’s the most basic condition you evaluate... “it’s gone... now what?”
Of course you would think that. Another random person on the Internet hot-to-trot to incur risks onto the company without personal accountability for having made that decision. Yeehaw! All the reckless cowboys are coming out to play today.
Of course I would think that.... because its what the company did previously and makes sense unless someone brings up a reason why it wouldn’t work (which you have failed to do... you just chastise people instead of actually disproving anything).
The only reasons disney turns people away at the gate with their ticket are
1) to make sure you’ve paid admission
2) the park is full
(And an outcome of decrementing an admission on your ticket)
They know #2 isn’t happening based on overall trends and activity level on property. And #1 is a low risk because people had to make plans to be there before this... you don’t buy tickets at the gate anymore... so you are only blocking the people that have made mistakes. And what percentage is that?
Why do you stop your entire business over some tiny fraction of loss prevention? That’s moronic. You focus on making sure your making money from the 99.5% and ignore the small paper credit loss. You ignore decrementing admissions as just the loss... no significant amount would change their stay length because of it anyway... their admissions were already all planned out... and expire within a short time. It would largely have no impact.
You can’t make revenue reappear if people didn’t spend the money... so you always keep the cash til open! That’s what happens in the real world...
Last edited: