Chupaca Bruh
Active Member
Franchised
But then does that mean the functional one is a franchise? If so, why is she always there? Does it mean the one in the ride is a franchise? That doesn't sound thematically fitting at all...Franchised
Being her first franchise location she's there to cut the ribbon.But then does that mean the functional one is a franchise? If so, why is she always there? Does it mean the one in the ride is a franchise? That doesn't sound thematically fitting at all...
They had a bounce house slide at the ribbon cutting?Being her first franchise location she's there to cut the ribbon.
The second location was going to be Disney Springs, but the rent was too high…Being her first franchise location she's there to cut the ribbon.
The “shrinking the guests” conceit is why the former CFO found the money for this projectIn order to do a "shrink the guests" gag, all the AAs would have to be supersized. We're looking at a six foot tall possum. Louis would be 20 feet tall. The kind of stuff done in Toy Story Land.
Disney "fans": I doubt Disney will provide an adequate amount of AAs.
Also Disney "fans": I'm quick to believe that Disney will provide giant AAs.
Tiana's Palace Playplace™They had a bounce house slide at the ribbon cutting?
Same thing happens in Cars Land. It’s really not that big of a deal.I'm still struggling to understand how they'd make that work - you see one version of Tianas Palace in the finale, you walk outside and (at least at Disneyland [for now, hopefully in Florida too soon]) see a very different-looking version. How'd they make that work? I just feel like it'd be confusing. While I agree it's the most likely option, it just doesn't make sense, cohesion-wise. Now, if they made it look like the exterior of the real restaurant they built at DL, not the one from the movie, it'd make sense.
Well yes, but in cars land the only major change is characters and the time of day. This is, from everything I'm seeing, a major facade change. It simply wouldn't make thematic sense...Same thing happens in Cars Land. It’s really not that big of a deal.
Oh, that's why they added the inflatable 30 foot rooms!!They can make Louis 20 feet tall on a screen
It was apparently in a patreon exclusive podcast-Where did Alicia make these claims? I haven’t seen them so was unaware of this whole “shrinking” possible plot line.
Thanks!It was apparently in a patreon exclusive podcast-
Premium Podcast - Tiana's Bayou Adventure Rumors | Theme Park Stop
Get more from Theme Park Stop on Patreonwww.patreon.com
EagleScout put up a summary though including the shrinking thing.
Hercules brought Meg back to life. There was also a crossover episode of the Aladdin and Hercules animated TV shows where Hades brings Jafar back to life. I also mentioned The Black Cauldron, where the main villain brings an army of skeletons back to life (and the main villain himself may not be entirely "alive" either, since his face resembles a skeletal corpse).Aside from non-canon celebrations and shows, are there any dead villains or any other characters that just come back?
It’s also (unfortunately IMO) outdated info from the “Louis centered” version of the ride that they abandoned.It was apparently in a patreon exclusive podcast-
Premium Podcast - Tiana's Bayou Adventure Rumors | Theme Park Stop
Get more from Theme Park Stop on Patreonwww.patreon.com
EagleScout put up a summary though including the shrinking thing.
Wait, wait, hold the phone, wait… You’re saying the ride isn’t going to be one giant presentation to potential shareholders in a food co-op highlighting the value of purchasing shares in the co-op, with commentary on the profitably and sustainability of said co-op? Because that’s what I led to believe we were getting in this thread.I don't think it's fair to assume that one storyline is more "scary" than the other with how little we actually know right now. A rabbit being chased by a bear and a fox certainly adds an element of suspense / tension to the ride, but I wouldn't call it "scary." Especially when you consider the actual story element to Splash isn't really revealed until you're actually on the ride, aside from some light teasing in the queue. There's no reason to assume TBA won't take the same approach, especially with how much of the ride experience itself they're keeping under wraps. We can't possibly know that the ride is devoid of all conflict until it opens and we can see for ourselves, or we're explicitly told so. First timers are not basing their decision to ride on the storyline, something they know nothing about if they haven't ridden before. They're basing it off the drop, briar patch or not.
That wasn’t the story of splash?None of my kids really understood the story of Splash. They thought it was just a bunch of incompetent animals chasing a clever rabbit with happy music going around. It was a cartoon.
The thrill was just big drops and their anticipation.
It is. People are mistaking not noticing details and nuance (like the reverse psychology used by B'rer Rabbit) with not understanding the storyThat wasn’t the story of splash?
Whenever people say Facillier's gonna be the lift hill, I feel so bad for them. It was such a missed opportunity IMO.I do wish they were going with Facillier for the lift hill, but I think it'll still be intense for anyone who's already scared of the drop.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.