MK Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress

brideck

Well-Known Member
I don't care what side your on with Splash or Tiana, you have to admit that the issues and amount of downtime is major concern. For the money they spent, it should be much more reliable.

The bigger concern is if they can't get this right in terms of AAs working properly or not falling apart, what makes you think these new attractions will be any better?

I remember the Frozen ride having AA problems, etc. when it opened, too, but I've memory holed how long that went on for before things stabilized there. Is there some hope based on that track record that things will get figured out here for a more consistent experience?
 

Jrb1979

Well-Known Member
This is especially disheartening, knowing that TP subscribers generally are a bit more knowledgable than the GP. They really like this??
IMO it's not that surprising at all. I would imagine a good chunk of TP subscribers are newer younger Disney fans. They probably have more of an attachment to Tiana than Song of the South.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
It does show how how little your average guest cares about nostalgia, downtime or if the IP fits.
It shows that as much as a lot of us want the parks to keep their theme, all the average guest wants is IP they know and grew up with
Again, I have my views on this. But at least as of right now it seems to reinforce the Ip mandate.

Now, that said, is it moving the needle in terms of new bookings and such? No telling. There’s other ways they can see whether this was a success from a financial/operational standpoint. But as of now it seems to be a well-liked attraction.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
It does show how how little your average guest cares about nostalgia, downtime or if the IP fits.
It shows that as much as a lot of us want the parks to keep their theme, all the average guest wants is IP they know and grew up with
People love log flumes, especially in hot places like Florida, they could likely theme it to anything and it would still be popular.

I like the Tiana theme, the bayou fits the ride perfectly, I just wish the story and execution was better.
 

solidyne

Well-Known Member
This doesn’t surprise me, my survey results would look favorable and show I like Tiana also, what it wouldn’t show was I thought Splash was a 9 and I rank Tiana as a 7. Splash was vastly superior (to me) but I still enjoy Tiana.

Surveys only tell half the story.
Good point. There are differences between good, great, awesome, fun, cool, enjoyable, thrilling, mind-blowing, neat, impressive, and decent.
 

Streetway Again

Active Member
It does show how how little your average guest cares about nostalgia, downtime or if the IP fits.
It shows that as much as a lot of us want the parks to keep their theme, all the average guest wants is IP they know and grew up with
If it wasn’t popular with guests and not making money, Disney would’ve stopped. I know people think there’s a small hope that with some major administration change, things will go back to the way they were, but I doubt it. I don’t think original attractions have zero chance of coming back, and that the remaining themes of parks will be completely eradicated, but I think it’s time to face the music, and accept the way of “replace with newer thing and Disney ip” is the way things are now. Doesn’t mean it’ll be bad, just different. Was a sucky thing as a fan to come to grips with, but that’s the way it is I guess.
 

Jrb1979

Well-Known Member
If it wasn’t popular with guests and not making money, Disney would’ve stopped. I know people think there’s a small hope that with some major administration change, things will go back to the way they were, but I doubt it. I don’t think original attractions have zero chance of coming back, and that the remaining themes of parks will be completely eradicated, but I think it’s time to face the music, and accept the way of “replace with newer thing and Disney ip” is the way things are now. Doesn’t mean it’ll be bad, just different. Was a sucky thing as a fan to come to grips with, but that’s the way it is I guess.
I have accepted this the new Disney. I don't like it at all. I'm not sure the IP focused way of things is going to have the nostalgia factor the original parks had. Look at Universal Hollywood and Nintendo. They go a big bump in attendance it's first year and since then have gone back down.

IMO it's the big issue with these IP lands. People will flock to see them once but they will lose their appeal after the first time.
 

Streetway Again

Active Member
I have accepted this the new Disney. I don't like it at all. I'm not sure the IP focused way of things is going to have the nostalgia factor the original parks had. Look at Universal Hollywood and Nintendo. They go a big bump in attendance it's first year and since then have gone back down.

IMO it's the big issue with these IP lands. People will flock to see them once but they will lose their appeal after the first time.

Im more open to it, because the ideas shown could still make for good new attractions. Imagineering still has talent. As for the lands, Yeah, we’ll see how that works out, but this is the eventual end result of the runway at success of potter. The industry adapted.

And In hindsight post acceptance, i hope this doesn’t sound too much like a shill, I think that we are taking the things Disney does to appease us, like adjusting Tropical Americas to be a village and be about animals vaguely, making villains one of the expansions and brining back door coaster, keeping the bears with a new show, putting muppets in RNRC, and keeping figment around all these years and doing the whole ‘world of motion test track’ thing for granted ALOT. does it sometimes come off as consolation prizes and sorta soulless attempts to placate us? Absolutely, and sometimes I do think they are. And yes, the closures still are bad. But with the way the parks are going, It’s a small miracle they are still catering to us like that, and it’s better than nothing. Because it could ALWAYS be worse.
 

Brer Oswald

Well-Known Member
I will gladly explain. 1. The queue. 2. The entire outside stretch. 3. The former laughing place. The new scene feels much more colorful and the water effect actually works! And 4. The finale. As for the lack of wait times. Ha ha I wish.
1) The new queue feels incredibly cheap. I’ll be the first one to say that the Splash queue wasn’t the greatest, but it at least served a point introducing you to the story and the characters of the ride itself. You had these iconic custom signs and props, the wanted posters which promoted world building, the bird houses that featured conversations between the birds about the Brer Rabbit storyline, the character portraits, and of course the Brer Frog projection where he started telling the story to his kids (which leads into the animatronic telling you the story on the first lift hill).

Compare this to TBA which has replaced most of the unique custom props with stickers on flat plywood and props they bought off of Etsy. And of course the backstory it’s “telling” you is completely irrelevant to the plot of the ride.

2) The outside loop feels cluttered while not having any meaningful things to look at. The one moment I will give you is after the initial lift hill. The reveal of the water tower is actually pretty good, and you feel like you’re in a bayou for about 2 seconds. Unfortunately it goes downhill after this. The reveal of the drop is not as poignant as before, especially with the puke green splattered rocks. When you pass the interior barn hill, you’re welcomed by this incredibly gaudy Tiana’s food sign. Besides the charming Louis gourd statue, none of the crops are interesting or charming; they’re just pure filler. A disembodied Tiana voice is singing Almost There from the movie…for some reason. Then you have Mama Odie living in…a cave? If it wasn’t clear before, the outdoor loop makes it very clear this was budget overhaul, and that this ride was clearly meant to be something else.

Splash’s exterior “How Do You Do” loop was designed very strategically to transition you into the whimsically animated world of the critters. There weren’t thousands of filler flowers plastered on the rocks, however, there were several custom props created to enhance the world building of the fictional community the Imagineers created. “Critter Elixr”, “Brer Soap”, “Muskrat Moonshine”, all charming little details. Then you had the CUSTOM made birdhouses that emanated the singing voices of cute little birds. This continued with Brer Rabbit’s House where you could hear his voice echo. And Brer Bear snoring from his cave. He’s a bear so of course he lives in a cave. Haven’t even mentioned the music (highly sought after for a reason), the small broken bridge above the drop, or the fact that the critters actually named the transition drop as “Slippin Falls”.

3) Then comes the former Laughing Place. I agree, the lighting is much improved. It actually looks like the lighting in the former Disneyland Laughing Place. The problem is that there’s also nothing of value to look at. The new props are cheap. The frogs aren’t even animatronic. The screen is tacky. The best part of this scene are the elements that were left over from Splash. The amazing rock work. The jumping fountains (which did work btw, even in 2022). I miss the beehives, the Brer animatronics, the cartoon props, the weasels.

4) The finale is subjective. I do think it’s the one scene where they actually tried. The tunnel and home sweet home replacements are objective downgrades, however the main room is fine. It’s a small glimpse into what this ride could have been if it was built from the ground up.

TL;dr Most of Splash’s “weaker” elements were still filled with intentional details that actually ENHANCED the attraction’s story telling and world building. The same spots in Tiana are filled with mindless filler that most people won’t ever notice anyways.
 

Agent H

Well-Known Member
I have accepted this the new Disney. I don't like it at all. I'm not sure the IP focused way of things is going to have the nostalgia factor the original parks had. Look at Universal Hollywood and Nintendo. They go a big bump in attendance it's first year and since then have gone back down.

IMO it's the big issue with these IP lands. People will flock to see them once but they will lose their appeal after the first time.
I feel like Harry potter world kinda disproves this.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom