Vinnie Mac
Well-Known Member
Dunno if this supposed to be a negative point against the ride but let's just say half of the animatronics are moving props, that's still a remarkable amount of kinetic movement on that ride. Lots of action going on.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
News Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress
- Thread starter wdwmagic
- Start date
I think it's more to do with the whole "dozens" thing. Of those, how many are actual "animatronics" and not just a static critter that moves back and forth on the bones of a $20 oscillating pedestal fan? Not that there's anything wrong with that. (Works for Spirit Halloween) It's just not a good look comparatively -- if we're only getting 24-ish animatronics in this new version of Splash Mountain.
Disstevefan1
Well-Known Member
I am holding them to at least 24 things that move. Strobe lights and fog machines not included.
Prince-1
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
Kirby86
Well-Known Member
No Disco Luis?
He's an actual journalist that goes by standard journalistic ethics. IOW, no click bait assumptions from spurious sources.
He can call Disney PR for confirmation on certain rumors and they at least pick up the phone for him.
For AAs, they can put flat, shiny, plasticized critters glued to the wall or on a stick that rotates slightly back and forth and rename the ride "Voyage of the Little Restaurateur."
LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
He certainly comes across well. Thank you!
yensidtlaw1969
Well-Known Member
Let's not forget that almost none of the animatronics were particularly advanced - I don't think Splash had any A-100's, even, despite the tech hitting the scene around the time Splash was being developed. The Hopping Brer Rabbit was complex (when he worked), but nearly everything else was older tech with far less dynamic motion.
It's not rare to have the focus of a scene set on one great Animatronic with simpler ones playing supporting roles to flesh it out. Even in Pirates most of the figures are animated pretty simply, with only a few leading characters like Jack Sparrow and the Auctioneer demonstrating any contemporary technical prowess. If they play that kind of card here it's absolutely possible for that to result in great staging.
OrlandoRising
Well-Known Member
Yes, Scott has an actual background in journalism and works for Nexstar, the largest owner of local TV stations in the country. He also used to write for a now-defunct Disney-centric site called The Social Mouse. You can trust what he reports, he doesn't really play the rumor game as far as I've seen.
Heck, just using a real name and not disguising your voice is a major improvement over certain sources of "information" in our weird corner of the internet.
FettFan
Well-Known Member
Quote frankly I thought that first one was just a Thomas Kinkaide Studios print that was released as a “what if”.
Never believed it was actual concept art until it was confirmed by Disney theme parks blog.
JD80
Well-Known Member
I've had him on my podcast before, he's a pretty awesome guy.
LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
I had no idea you have a podcast! Could you share a link?
SplashJacket
Well-Known Member
Does anyone know if this holds any water? Beyond Pecos Bill?
LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
And where would this leave Thunder Mountain?
I hate the idea of losing the Bears but I'm sure Disney's mindset is- "Old and no merch, must go"
The rumor says it would go into a "Southwestern" or "Desert Land" with Coco and Encanto.
Here's the video -
Realistically, if the plan involves any changes to two additional attractions (Bears, possibly Big Thunder), I doubt they have the cash for it at the moment. Fans will likely protest anything changing to the bears as well (but at least we'll always have Tokyo bears)...
GrumpyFan
Well-Known Member
You should add a link to that in your profile.