• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

MK Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress

Status
Not open for further replies.

Midwest Elitist

Well-Known Member
Not really. Most of the scenery is physical and dense. That’s what makes the screens that are included all the more jarring.
The trees and scenery on the side did a fantastic job of limiting what you can see, and the painted walls had an affect where the distance looked believable from the logs. Because that was the design of the attraction. With the 2D screens, the animations suspend all disbelief, and ruins the immersion completely.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
The trees and scenery on the side did a fantastic job of limiting what you can see, and the painted walls had an affect where the distance looked believable from the logs. Because that was the design of the attraction. With the 2D screens, the animations suspend all disbelief, and ruins the immersion completely.
I’m not defending the screens; I thought I was pretty clear about that. I was just disputing your “warehouse of screens” characterisation, which still doesn’t really make sense to me.
 

FettFan

Well-Known Member
The trees and scenery on the side did a fantastic job of limiting what you can see, and the painted walls had an affect where the distance looked believable from the logs. Because that was the design of the attraction. With the 2D screens, the animations suspend all disbelief, and ruins the immersion completely.

Same with the primeval diorama at Universe of Energy…the painted backdrop and lighting effects made the space look like it went FAR into the distance, when in reality it was maybe 10 feet behind the brontosaur family.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Disney may have fooled me for awhile with the AA footage, but at least I know my concerns and predictions were pretty much on point throughout.

I was worried the mountain would look less iconic. It does.

I was worried modern imagineers wouldn't understand how to utilize music to score a musical attraction. They didn't.

I was worried that the removal of Splash AA's would leave big empty moments and the new figures would lack character. Yup.

I was worried about the dialogue and plot. MMMHMMM.

I was worried that the lift hill and drop would be recontextualized. It was.

I was worried that the recontextualization of the lift hill and drops would work against the storytelling in place in the ride design. It did.

The only thing I didn't know about was the idea to end the attraction on an unknown original song and having it fade out so quickly to final nothing scene of Odie.

I know it is much easier to armchair imagineer than actually doing it, but I wonder how much fault lies with modern Imagineering and how much lies with management not giving them the resources or freedom to design rides like they used to. I'm sure its a mix, but this feels like management told them to craft an original story, save money, and avoid all scary/problematic themes. And this was the best the modern imagineers could come up with those restrictions. Which is kind of baffling.

I understand the "wait and see" crowd, but it also is annoying that folks have been laying out evidence for years and they refuse to look at it or understand how many of us came to these conclusions. Let's all remember that thinking critically about what we have been presented is not jumping to conclusions.

Is it possible that WDI can only function one way?

As in they need to come up with the concepts/ride systems and then pitch them?

What I’m getting at is if they are given something existing and told “we need to change this to X…”. They’re done. It doesn’t work well
 

zakattack99

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Rumors say that Burbank and it's DEI is pressuring Tokyo HARD to take this thing. For some reason, Burbank REALLY wan'ts "Splash Mountain" 100% cancelled.

I suspect that they don't want this new attraction to be forced to live in the shadow of a working (and popular) "Splash Mountain" in Tokyo. The comparrisons between the two will never stop and it will go on for decades. This is debate is bad for Orlando and Anaheim.
I have heard this rumor as well. I have also heard that OLC was finally starting to relent and come to the table to discuss what this change would look like. Idk how they don’t walk away after seeing this today. OLC has all the ammo they need now to hold their ground for a long time between the attraction and reaction idk how OLC moves forward with any changes.
 

Midwest Elitist

Well-Known Member
I have heard this rumor as well. I have also heard that OLC was finally starting to relent and come to the table to discuss what this change would look like. Idk how they don’t walk away after seeing this today. OLC has all the ammo they need now to hold their ground for a long time between the attraction and reaction idk how OLC moves forward with any changes.
This video probably saved Tokyo. It demonstrates that Imagineering stateside his lost all it's focus and can't be trusted to replace TDLs #1 ride.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Can someone explain this “shrinking part” for me. So the story is to find musicians for the party and they find all these critters to be part of the band and Tiana wants you to find more so she has Mama Odie shrink you to go into some log thing and find two frogs (all I saw) and then apparently that was enough so she makes you big again and has you go down a waterfall to get their quicker. Am I missing anything?
I think Louis hears the frogs in the log (that's why he's half in it). And so, to get to the frog band, Odie shrinks us down to recruit them for the party.
 

Brer Panther

Well-Known Member
However, I was still willing to give it a chance to try and was somewhat of a "soft defender" of the ride early on as I had heard some positive things about it that intrigued me. This does not live up to the moderate expectations I had.
That friend of yours who claimed this would be great? I'm now even more suspicious of his claims that the Disneyland version will retain all the America Sings animatronics. None of their Magic Kingdom counterparts survived the retheme we got.
I think this will be well-received by the general public. If you throw them a bone of their favorite songs from whatever IP you've shoved in where it doesn't belong, they'll be bopping along the whole way and sing its praises to Research at the end.
I'm sure there's gonna be people claiming this is better than Splash Mountain because it's INCLUSIVE and NOT RACIST.
so take my opinion with a grain of salt
I'm so tempted to make a salt mine joke.
And Mermaid doesn’t have cheap looking sets either.
Yeah, it's the animatronics in the Little Mermaid ride that look cheap.
I really hate the way these two women have been vilified by those critical of the retheme.
I saved all my hatred for Bob Iger, for what it's worth.
Untitled800_20240601173034.png
The vultures being replaced by a screen with that hideous CGI Mama Odie on it is, quite possibly, the most appalling thing I've seen all day.
Where are the spoonbills or other critters??
Yeah, where the heck ARE the spoonbills?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom