You must be new here.How is this something we're arguing over?
You must be new here.How is this something we're arguing over?
Well yeah, the middle in front of Liberty Tree Tavern is the preferred option right? Already got the flow going....I just pee on the walkway in Frontierland and have for decades because in the Magic Kingdom, some things should never change.
But they certainly are cramming "Tiana's Foods" down our throats...lol SO it is no wonder people will think the attraction is called Tiana's Foods....It's not the attraction marquee. The attraction name is not "Tiana's Foods".
EDIT: It's difficult to respond when you continue editing after a response has been offered. If you can't follow what has been said, I can't help. Nothing I've said is confusing. I have responded to your posts directly. You continue to hop from one point to another, so you may be confusing yourself.
I already said in previous posts that I suppose you didn't fully read, but Diamond Horseshoe has clearly modern fixtures that don't match the other lanterns on the building at all and are angled downward, allowing you to see the bulbs when underneath.
View attachment 757899
Even ones that have a sort of light patina or a bit of mine light look like those on Pecos Bill and Frontier Mercantile are flimsily themed, with more modern-looking armatures and positioning, such that they really don't look any different from the outdated night shot you provided for Tiana.
View attachment 757904
Dude. Read my posts. I have said original lighting for awhile. You just think what is written, like EST. 1927 can't be anachronistic because it is in a retro font.Your point has changed from “this will look wrong in Frontierland” to “two lighting fixtures specifically may look out of place if an outdated rendering is realized” to “broadly, things are declining by degrees and the fixture theming here exemplifies that” to “other marquees aren’t treated this way” to “well, I guess I mean newer marquees based on more recent standards; don’t look at the signs on the buildings that will be adjacent to this.”
I have no intention of continuing to go around in circles on different tangents when my only point is that, to date, what we see aesthetically from the front of the attraction does not feel out of place. Nothing more, nothing less. I share concerns others have with some of the queue elements and the time period.
Screens are best used for backgrounds & quick moments. I think Rise of the Resistance does that pretty well; great sets, some cool animatronics & screens are largely used in the background.It's because the physical space demands something else. When you have full control over the design of the space, screens can be done correctly, and they can do things physical setpieces can't, like with the rising of the ships from the depths in Shanghai's Pirates. You can also have characters enter, exit, and animate in ways that are not possible for animatronics. That said, you can also get lazy and park people in front of screens, and screens can be used as a crutch even when wholly unnecessary. But I don't really have anything against them in principle.
I hope so. But I feel we'd need to get more Eisner-style leadership to get that again; someone who understands theme parks.On the bright side, maybe this will make Disney realize they have to try harder with EVERY new ride they make. Like, now they've shown people that they CAN do better, so how pathetic would it look if their next ride after Tiana was a massive downgrade?
But I doubt that'll happen.
“Original” to me means lighting that was original to Frontierland, like the Diamond Horseshoe and Pecos Bill lighting examples I provided above. I don’t even know what you’re talking about. I assumed by posting again you meant that the examples I gave weren’t what you were talking about, but you’re making discussion impossible.Dude. Read my posts. I have said original lighting for awhile.
I never said any of this. I am not shocked. I am not saying there is no decline. I made one statement about the appearance of the front of the mountain.You just think what is written, like EST. 1927 can't be anachronistic because it is in a retro font.
If you can't see the degrees declining, then don't be so shocked that you don't like the mural. That is how it works.
I will say, it's hard to fully get this message across when they're making admittedly great screen-based attractions like Flights of Passage & Cosmic Rewind though. You need higher ups who see the difference between those two & Runaway Railroad or whatever.
I think that’s just a media problem, though. It’s probably the right medium, just with inexplicably boring footage.The screens don't really add much to Cosmic Rewind, though. People don't love the ride because of them.
I think that’s just a media problem, though. It’s probably the right medium, just with inexplicably boring footage.
How is this something we're arguing over?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.