No Name
Well-Known Member
And this makes them even more out of touch than I expected!The initial announcement for this ride did not give them the sort of unanimous positive feedback that they expected
And this makes them even more out of touch than I expected!The initial announcement for this ride did not give them the sort of unanimous positive feedback that they expected
Really? Maybe you missed it. There were three within the main hour.Who are we talking about exactly? Hardly anyone from Imagineering was on stage for any appreciable amount of time during the main presentation.
I saw them, but as I said, they were not on stage for that long, and they were not acting in the manner the poster I was responding to described. He or she said it was fine for Walt to hype up what they were doing in the days of old, so I assumed they were at least theoretically fine with Bob and Josh doing it too; instead, they said the Imagineers of today were overly self-congratulatory. I didn't see it there, so I'm wondering who we're talking about.Really? Maybe you missed it. There were three within the main hour.
But the situation as a whole is not dependent on the few Imagineers there. The rest were execs going "Believe me" and "trust us" with "this is the best company"
I saw them, but as I said, they were not on stage for that long, and they were not acting in the manner the poster I was responding to described. He or she said it was fine for Walt to hype up what they were doing in the days of old, so I assumed they were at least theoretically fine with Bob and Josh doing it too; instead, they said the Imagineers of today were overly self-congratulatory. I didn't see it there, so I'm wondering who we're talking about.
It seems to be an issue with entertainment as a whole. They think people actually care about them as individuals but in reality for most people it’s more like the relationship that existed between royalty and court jesters: succeed in entertaining us or it’s off with your head (metaphorically) for all we care. Of course though this changes for those that have proven themselves like the Steven Spielbergs and Tony Baxters of the world.Bingo.
It's that kind of stuff that concerns a lot of us about this current WDI generation.
Today's Imagineers seem to be really excited to talk about themselves and how brilliantly they approach their work and how important and meaningful it all is, but then when we see that actual work as paying customers.... er...
I've only seen Cinderella. Wasn't interested in the rest.I dont mind the remakes if they try something different. "The Jungle Book" remake was superior to the cartoon. "Cinderella" changed just enough. But these shot-for-shot remakes are pointless. I think the nadir was "The Lion King" 'live action' which was a cartoon remake of a cartoon
I worked fairly independently for years and then, during Covid, started back in a more traditional workplace. I’m amazed at how much more you have to “sell yourself” these days. I feel like it’s a problem of the social media era. The degree to which one must use all the right buzzwords and self-promote seems to have increased quite a bit. It was always a thing but not, I don’t think, to this extent.Yep, this…
If ya’ hafta’ continually tell people how brilliant you are, chances are, you’re not.
I don’t remember the older Imagineers doing anything like this.
I’ve seen interviews with many of them over the years. They all seemed very modest, and also talked about how many failures they had before achieving success regarding story, designs, engineering, etc. I remember an interview with Bob Gurr regarding opening day at Disneyland (we all know how much of a near disaster that was), and he was talking about how the Autopia cars kept breaking down, etc.
Walt didn’t heap praise on his employees…he hired them to do a job, and expected it done.
I remember a story about a young Imagineer proudly approaching Walt and an associate (John Hench, IIRC) to show him his design option for a new project. Walt inspected it for a few moments and then replied something like… “Hmmm. That’s OK, but, it’s hard to choose between just one option.”…!!!!!
There were no participation trophies and “You are special…!!!” praise in that world.
You did the job you were paid to do, and went home at the end of the day with that satisfaction.
I worked fairly independently for years and then, during Covid, started back in a more traditional workplace. I’m amazed at how much more you have to “sell yourself” these days. I feel like it’s a problem of the social media era. The degree to which one must use all the right buzzwords and self-promote seems to have increased quite a bit. It was always a thing but not, I don’t think, to this extent.
That’s where you’re making the mistake…wait times have absolutely NOTHING to do with the perceived quality of the ride…FEA was yet another example of Disney shoehorning IP into an attraction. The AA’s with those projected faces are HORRIBLE.We (the WDW Disney Enthusiasts) often have a different viewpoint from the every day targeted Disney guest. The Frozen ride is immensely popular. Maelstrom had a place in all of our heart's, but the wait times were average walk on VS. Frozen which is consistently 60 minutes.
Again, the historian and avid fan (most of this board) may have different views, but the echo chamber we converse in shouldn't be the end all/be all on how successful this ride is for the park.
They should just take the extra unused AAs from Splash if they can be reused and add them to FEA…I am so bitter over every other version of Frozen Ever After not having those awful projected faces.
Like we maybe might do something in a couple of years kind of dump?I have a feeling there'll be a big ride info dump in February. It just makes sense as something Disney would do.
I was surprised by the lack of information last week.
When they announced TBA information I settled down to hear, or see some proper new details.
We got a weird shot of Louis.
Aaaaaannnnddd moving on.. make a wish...
It was really odd.
They’re not telling us because this attraction is SO incendiary…they know whatever they release is going to get torn to shreds on this site and ALL social media.It's really, really odd. (I added an extra one for you)
This attraction is under construction on both coasts. They know what's going to be in every single scene. They not only know where every single AA is going, but where they also know every single light fixture is being placed and every single speaker and every single projection rig is going.
And yet they won't really tell us what is in this ride. At this point, that is concerning and sends up a warning flare.
Still significantly less than what was there prior. Even the less populated WDW version.By my calculation, there will be (at least) eight human animatronics in the final scene, plus Louis, plus some lower-tech animal figures. That’s a decent number.
I know, but I'm trying to think of this as a new ride rather than continually compare it to what was there before. The number of animatronics we currently know of is, in itself, quite generous.Still significantly less than what was there prior. Even the less populated WDW version.
Inherently difficult when Disney rethemes the ride.I know, but I'm trying to think of this as a new ride rather than continually compare it to what was there before. The number of animatronics we currently know of is, in itself, quite generous.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.