BrerFoxesBayouAdventure
Well-Known Member
Song of the South's reputation could've been easily cleared up had the company released it with a content warning attached to it, but there's no way they'd do that now.Gone with the Wind and Looney Tunes are two of the most important pieces of film history and have retained that status for nearly a century. Song of the South meanwhile for the last 30-40 years has had a reputation as “the banned Disney movie” to even casual audiences. That’s been the film’s entire legacy for decades now, and only viewed through a lens of it being a forbidden object. It’s a fetishized pop culture urban legend. It sits culturally next to those articles about Disneyland deaths.
Years ago back in the 2000s, Disney released a variety of titles under its Walt Disney Treasures collection. Included amongst these were chronological releases containing all of the Mickey, Donald, and Goofy cartoon shorts. All of the racially insensitive cartoons were included as this was an adult-oriented set intended for collectors instead of the general public.This is also the larger issue of film preservation when historical art is owned by modern media mega-companies. A problematic but historically significant piece of fine art can be given context within an educational environment like a museum, but Disney movies are family entertainment sold in Blu-Ray combo packs at Target or exist as a tile on an app next to Elemental and Gordon Ramsay’s Food Stars.
Something like this was considered for Song of the South, but Disney ultimately put their foot down and said no. So that's why we have a DVD of Annette from The Mickey Mouse Clubhouse instead of something deserving of being included in the collection.