Tiana's Bayou Adventure: Disneyland Watch & Discussion

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
That's strange to me as every other castle park has their Pooh ride (or two) in Fantasyland.
I know. I can’t picture it at all. It doesn’t help that I used to work in Fantasyland and have that Bavarian village aesthetic burned in my mind. I’ve also always known Pooh to be in Critter Country. I think the wooded, outdoorsy aesthetic for Pooh works and I can’t see that fitting in Fantasyland.

I can picture Robin Hood, The Sword in the Stone, The Black Cauldron, and others, but not Pooh.
 
Last edited:

PiratesMansion

Well-Known Member
I know. I can’t picture it at all. It doesn’t help that I used to work in Fantasyland and have that Bavarian village aesthetic burned in my mind. I’ve also always known Pooh to be in Critter Country.

I can picture Robin Hood, The Sword in the Stone, The Black Cauldron, and others, but not Pooh.
If they can make Mr. Toad seem like it fits, I don't see why they couldn't do the same for Pooh.
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
If they can make Mr. Toad seem like it fits, I don't see why they couldn't do the same for Pooh.
For me, again, it’s the facade of the attraction. It’s not the story. Toad’s facade fits.

I would have to see an illustration of a Bavarian facade with a Pooh aesthetic to see it working. I’m having a difficult time imagining that, especially because I think Pooh’s facade and surroundings in Critter Country work so well.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
I know. I can’t picture it at all. It doesn’t help that I used to work in Fantasyland and have that Bavarian village aesthetic burned in my mind. I’ve also always known Pooh to be in Critter Country. I think the wooded, outdoorsy aesthetic for Pooh works and I can’t see that fitting in Fantasyland.

I can picture Robin Hood, The Sword in the Stone, The Black Cauldron, and others, but not Pooh.

Tokyo has a woodsy exterior and queue, complete with English cottage gift shop at the end.

IMO, it's no less European than the rest of Fantasyland

1649553063928.png


1649553089902.png


1649553145449.png


1649553178669.png
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Original Poster

Midwest Elitist

Well-Known Member
A friend and I were talking about it when we were in the parks last year. What if they have one involving Mama Odie's gumbo pot tipping over and enchanting the bayou and ends up creating a "swell" of magic or something.

Totally ridiculous and stupid, but on that same note it would be fitting for modern Disney....

Looking at you, Cosmic Rewind..
I woke up in the E.R. after reading this.

Sadly, it's in line with Guardians' Tower "slamming down into the ground and there's goo that shows this!1!1!"
 

Midwest Elitist

Well-Known Member
If the intention truly is to eradicate any ties to Song of the South, I wouldn't be surprised if Disney got rid of Critter Country entirely as in the 80s when they came up with the land, they explicitly said the name came from the Uncle Remus quote where "The critters were closer to the folks and the folks closer to the critters."

Remus says the quote shortly before launching into Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Dah:

Basically, the entire namesake of the land comes from SOTS.

This justification is honestly laughable, but again, wouldn't be surprising for current Disney.
 

Brer Panther

Well-Known Member
Here's a question that's been on my mind for a while...

Wouldn't a person of color hypothetically be more likely to be uncomfortable on the Hall of Presidents or The American Adventure than on Splash Mountain, since those attractions actually bring up slavery?
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Here's a question that's been on my mind for a while...

Wouldn't a person of color hypothetically be more likely to be uncomfortable on the Hall of Presidents or The American Adventure than on Splash Mountain, since those attractions actually bring up slavery?
Context is important here. Also, I highly doubt many POC felt uncomfortable riding Splash. That’s not why Disney is getting rid of the ride.
 

Dear Prudence

Well-Known Member
Context is important here. Also, I highly doubt many POC felt uncomfortable riding Splash. That’s not why Disney is getting rid of the ride.
That's why He Who Must Not Be named trying to claim that the way the characters talk on Splash is "mocking" AAVE (because they're an expert, I am SURE) is absolutely ludicrous. It's another reason why people just eating up everything they say is... bonkers.
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
That's why He Who Must Not Be named trying to claim that the way the characters talk on Splash is "mocking" AAVE (because they're an expert, I am SURE) is absolutely ludicrous. It's another reason why people just eating up everything they say is... bonkers.
This is why some people should just stay quiet on certain topics. They think they’re helping, but they’re not.
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I’m not sure. Perhaps open conversation can lead the real path to learning and understanding. It’s difficult at times, but I think it’s worth it overall.
Sure, if people choose to listen. But some people (even people here) refuse to listen to the actual community they find themselves trying to stand up for. In those cases, they should have a few seats.
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
...didn't seem like it.
I can think of exactly one person who’s been trying to push the narrative that Splash is racist. The disconnect here is that you seem you believe that because we understand why Disney is axing Splash, that that means we are supportive of the decision. We’re not.

99.9% of us have said the the ride itself isn’t a problem, POC included.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom