Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
One ride wont save a park.
...he was joking
One ride wont save a park.
Eh, TBD. Tax reform has some very nice incentives for accelerated depreciation.now if they would just spend more now to fast-track expansion in each park they will get a quicker ROI... but of course the Disney way is to be magically slow
It worked for UniversalOne ride wont save a park.
What's your thoughts on the hocus that disney was "trying" to limit attendance by driving up prices...to better the experience for their treasured guests?
...want to know what I think?
I remember that was discussion and it should have worked. The problem is that regardless of how expensive Disney is, people of all income groups will flock. Unfortunately, for many its once in a lifetime. But that isn't the target group, the target are those that are willing to spend 5000 or more on a Disney vacation. They do all the extras, desert parties, special viewing, vip experience.
Have you heard of Test Track? And other rides in the parks are barely walk ons usually... Other than Nemo and Living with the Land late in the day, and Mission Space during EMH.Frozen and Soarin are the best things in that park. Everything else is walk ons.
I agree, DAK was a park that was desperately in need of a fully themed land and a nighttime entertainment. They could have put a themed land devoted to Scrooge McDuck and so long as it had coherent cutting edge theming and quality cutting edge attractions it would have been a success.
...is there anyone who's gonna claim that Scrooge mcduck doesn't have more lasting appeal than a land I can't remember a single characters name from?
Not a one. Since a week after I saw it...once.
The angst is strong in this thread...
I just wanna say that I was down there four weeks ago. It was VERY crowded, but I saw no staffing or maintenance problems. Everything was as clean as I'd expect a Disney property to be. The staff was its usual friendly self. It was fine.
Even though the place was jammed with people, I only waited for more than an hour one time over seven days. A large part of that is that I know how to 'Disney'... but, it can still be done.
It worked for Universal
... but yeah. In this case it certainly won’t.
Sure there was a land involved... but the land consisted of one new ride. And it saved the entire resort.Universal didn't get just a ride, it got a whole land.
Sure there was a land involved... but the land consisted of one new ride. And it saved the entire resort.
Saying Harry Potter land was just a ride is disingenuous. People came to be IN diagon alley. Wear their robes, buy wizard beer, wave their wands, etc.
Of course. I’ve always argued that Disney and Universal parks are more than just rides but the entire experience. Which is why something like Star Wars land is collectively more than just two rides.Saying Harry Potter land was just a ride is disingenuous. People came to be IN diagon alley. Wear their robes, buy wizard beer, wave their wands, etc.
What is the 4th?And honestly, the argument could be made that it was 4 rides, even though 3 of them were re-branded...if people had never visited before and never experienced the rides, then it would be Harry Potter to them
What is the 4th?
Dragon Challenge Blue
Dragon Challenge Red (Hungarian Horntail and the other one I don't remember the name of)
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.