Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
Sorry, FedEx is experiencing delays and will not be able to deliver until a week from Tuesday
My brother is a veep at FedEx
(He hates amazon...FYI)
Sorry, FedEx is experiencing delays and will not be able to deliver until a week from Tuesday
Add them to the castle float!Burn them to ensure they’re dead!
Probably a better point of reference would be the timeline for Disneyland’s 50th in 2005. The 25th was a complete repainting of the castle and whatnot. This will be more similar to the overlay in 2005.Can anyone who was a WDW regular around the time of the 25th answer a question for me. How early in advance were the changes to the castle made in order to have everything ready for the 25th? Were the weeks preceding the event doomed with a castle that was covered with scaffolding?
Reason im asking is because im planning a trip for mid September and want my kids to at least be able to see the castle on their first visit.
1996 was more than a paint job.Probably a better point of reference would be the timeline for Disneyland’s 50th in 2005. The 25th was a complete repainting of the castle and whatnot. This will be more similar to the overlay in 2005.
Hence the use of my technical term “whatnot” haha1996 was more than a paint job.
The cats out of the bag. We're not getting new 'concerts'.....they're installing 'concertina' !!Building a military base in Epcot is never something that crossed my mind...
After watching the newest episode of WandaVision last night, there was a moment where the music sounded Very similar to ToT as you're in transit to the ride shaft.I am 100% okay with ToT as the park icon if it keeps the ride safe from a Guardians makeover!
That could be really cool. Sell new headbands with flashing LEDs that sync with new music for the 50th celebration as the floats go by.Imagine a version of Spectro that Sparkled with "EARidescence" as it made its way down Main Street . . .
Did they manipulate the footage to make the castle look better, or has the paintjob already begun to fade a little?Note: This is a continuation of the original 50th anniversary thread from 2015 available at https://forums.wdwmagic.com/threads/magic-kingdom-50th-anniversary-plans.900622/
VIDEO - Walt Disney World Resort 50th Anniversary Celebration plans to be unveiled
VIDEO - Walt Disney World Resort 50th Anniversary Celebration plans to be unveiled
A new Cinderella Castle overlay and Spaceship Earth lighting effects are teased in new video.www.wdwmagic.com
The problem with the Chinese Theater is that it is an imitation of an existing landmark and therefore not really Disney's own. This is why, I think, the Tower of Terror makes more sense as an icon (though I personally wish we could have the Earful Tower back).Which frustrates me, because The Chinese Theater has always been *exceptionally* well positioned (both literally and figuratively) for that role. If you had to sum up "Hollywood" in one building . . . ta da.
But, alas.
Too bad the content *in* the ToT isn't Disney's.The problem with the Chinese Theater is that it is an imitation of an existing landmark and therefore not really Disney's own. This is why, I think, the Tower of Terror makes more sense as an icon (though I personally wish we could have the Earful Tower back).
Interesting! I haven't seen Wandavision yet but want to. I highly doubt they'll change ToT for a long time though. They changed it in DCA bc the park as a whole needed more attention. HS has been the most popular park since the addition of Galaxy's Edge.After watching the newest episode of WandaVision last night, there was a moment where the music sounded Very similar to ToT as you're in transit to the ride shaft.
I am not nearly as knowledgeable as many of you about the Marvel restrictions so I'm not sure if WDW can change the ride or not...but I could see them using Wanda's powers "on the fritz" as a ride theme.
Hopefully they leave a classic just as it is but the chance for marketing new merch might be irresistible.
This is correct. From my understand and from what I've been told the new owners of the Chinese Theater felt the original agreement favored Disney too much and tried to rework a license agreement that did not allow Disney to use the iconic theater's likeness as a promotional tool and main icon for the park. I assume Disney didn't want to put up a fight so I guess an understanding was compromised and Disney erected the large Mickey hat and used that as the main icon for promos instead, dropping any link to the theater from artwork and ads. I assume it was later agreed that removing the hat was okay, as long as Disney can't use the theater in promos outside the park. My understanding is the visual likeness of the theater is limited only to a visual backdrop and nothing more, and cannot be used to promote the park in any way.I heard from someone that there is apparently legal issues with using the Chinese Theater as the parks icon.
I heard from someone that there is apparently legal issues with using the Chinese Theater as the parks icon.
There are no legal or licensing issues. It is a story made up by fans to justify the need for the Hat. There is no need to license the image of the Chinese Theater because it predates US copyright protection of architectural works (which unless specifically transferred to the building owner is held by the architect) and Disney would not have signed a 12 year licensing deal for the center icon of a park. It also makes no sense that Disney would just do what a small company wants if they have an existing deal. If there was a licensing issue then they would have replaced the facade when the ride changed. The only potential issue with ownership is the far less icon theater across the street from the Chinese Theater, the Disney owned El Capitan.This is correct. From my understand and from what I've been told the new owners of the Chinese Theater felt the original agreement favored Disney too much and tried to rework a license agreement that did not allow Disney to use the iconic theater's likeness as a promotional tool and main icon for the park. I assume Disney didn't want to put up a fight so I guess an understanding was compromised and Disney erected the large Mickey hat and used that as the main icon for promos instead, dropping any link to the theater from artwork and ads. I assume it was later agreed that removing the hat was okay, as long as Disney can't use the theater in promos outside the park. My understanding is the visual likeness of the theater is limited only to a visual backdrop and nothing more, and cannot be used to promote the park in any way.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.