Cesar R M
Well-Known Member
If it has quality then it will impress people regardless of whether it's a movie tie in or not. But there's already a lot to fear that the substance is going to be lacking. An already clearly massively value engineered version of the expansion is in effect, with the main E ticket coaster having been cut out per what insiders have stated here. So we're left with a Soarin-inspired simulator along with a (potentially drop-less) boat ride described as a "C ticket".
Of the two, the boat is the only one i'm really interested in at this point. Tired of simulators entirely, not an acceptable substitute (as a headliner attraction) in my book for a real ride travelling through a show building with actual physical sets and animatronics (don't care if they're labeling it as an E ticket). So the boat ride is the only real thing in this expansion i've even got my eye on. But it's extremely concerning that the imagineers have so little faith in it that internally they've classified it as merely a C ticket in quality. Little Mermaid after all was described as an "E ticket lite" during construction, and the Mine Train is only considered a D ticket internally. That doesn't give much hope that the boat ride will be better than an already disappointing New Fantasyland.
The only possible good news is the involvement of Rohde and Cameron, but there's only so much that can be done with a project if crippling budget mutilation ends up occurring (which is likely at this point due the failed money pit of nextgen). There also isn't anyone with real power involved with the creative process who will be willing to conduct political leverage in order to keep the bean counters from ruining things (like Lasseter was able to do with Cars Land when bean counters attempted to ruin that project). Like Fantasyland, I expect this to be a pretty new area to look at (again especially with who is overseeing the project), but I have my expectations for actual ride substance and quality set extremely low.
It is absolutely impossible to make the assumption that Pandora will be good at this point. We've only got a couple of models and concept art to go off and no substantial work has even started yet. We know too little to assume the best from this.
Let's not forget the supposed new night spectacular.
Pandora as the potential to be a "mysterious new world" type attraction, not so related to the movie.. but to the wonders if the movie.
So I will be very cautious in the approach.
Considering how huge the ego of Steve Jobs was back then... I wouldn't not be surprised if there was a big clash with other CEOS.. (doesnt anyone remember Steve's remarks against android and other products of the competition?)Eisner issues was not promoting Jeffrey Katzenberg and allowing Pixar to steal animation by using CGI where Disney refused to go. Both was caused by Eisner big ego. Frank Wells wasn't around to keep the egos in check. This all happened around 1995.
Iger know how to bring people together for a common cause. Steve Jobs health played a part with selling Pixar. I'm not sure what exactly brought George Lucas and Steve Jobs to Disney.
Was it the hate of Eisner or the smooth talking Iger that brought Pixar and Lucas to Disney?
I agree with those stating Iger biggest issue is he is not creative thus not playing attention to WDW.
Also George Lucas only seemed to use Star Wars as cashcow.. he didn't seem to have the "love" to create quality content.. he dumbed down many things that annoyed old hardcore fans just to attract kids that will forgive the franchise once a next thing that appeared (and It did with Potter)
Could be a Fraud?In other news...
Just saw this.
Is this a thing now? A new cottage industry?
Who the hell would give a 3rd party access to your MM+ accounts?
IMHO the problem is not the quality over quantity argument.This explains alot and wraps everything together. It was about this time when guests started to become rude, over saturation of strollers and the parks over crowded.
Quantity over Quality
The price was still high (in the resorts) to create the "Entitled Family".
Where the customer thinks they can have their way at all costs.
because they're so "Precious".