...
Oh, my dear
@WDW1974 - this post is already epic (rambling, epic, same deal) - but I think you miss the point on this one - since that only happens about (
faux)1%(
er) of the time, I forgive you - I also didn't know what to make of it at first blush. I don't think you will need to be hand-held, though - you'll get it pretty quickly.
SMALLVILLE --> SUPERMAN != GOTHAM --> BATMAN
This isn't Batman's origin story (thank the Gods, been done to death).
What's the biggest criticism that most filmed Batman media (including animation) has had since the days of Adam West's paunchy interpretation? That the villains end up trumping Batman in his own media.
They have eliminated Batman because this isn't his origin story -
it's theirs. It's a brilliant concept. Batman is a kid, he is there but from what I understand not even in every episode planned. He's a good 10 years from becoming Batman, at least. My grandma couldn't even probably tell you who Lex Luthor was, let alone Spidey or the X-Men's or really any Marvel villains - but she could name of half a dozen Bat-villains.
Now, we don't know if it will be any good or not - but combining a procedural (the most popular genre in the country by far), with Batman's rogues gallery instead of a new blank baddie every week, and the undercurrent of 75 years of mythology to play with...and focusing on what has proven to be the most iconic set of "evil" characters across media in that time - the idea is brilliant - it just remains to be seen what the execution ends up being.