jdmdisney99
Well-Known Member
So......24 Season 10? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
It could be argued that they are complicit, but they can't be bothered with some plebs from the swamps of Central Fla.Hi first time post long time lurker.
I don't understand how this is even a news story. So child predators work at Disney? Is this a surprise?
This has to be assumed with a company this large.
The only way this is news is if it is proven that Disney was complicit.
There is no evidence as such and this is NOT a news story at all.
I know some people here will go out of there way to bash on Disney for everything and it is well warranted in most cases but this is ridiculous.
agree 100%Hi first time post long time lurker.
I don't understand how this is even a news story. So child predators work at Disney? Is this a surprise?
This has to be assumed with a company this large.
The only way this is news is if it is proven that Disney was complicit.
There is no evidence as such and this is NOT a news story at all.
I know some people here will go out of there way to bash on Disney for everything and it is well warranted in most cases but this is ridiculous.
I dont think its fair to compare both images.
because:
a) the first photo are during active usage and during christmas (lots of decorations, the chairs are fully set)
b) the second photo looks like a "just after renovation" with zero details or tablets set.
as for liberty square.. anyone has comparison shots? because the ones posted in this thread are not comparable (different angles)
There is a theme park in grand island ny that just had a story a few weeks ago that a girl was touched on a ride by another guest.
This was odd because who let's their kid ride a roller coaster with a complete stranger.
I feel like the guests are probably a much much bigger issue.
Uh-oh...You can do background checks that are real (sorta like the checks Disney has done on some posters here).
No, John. There was no implication in the story that Disney, UNI or SW knowingly hired people known to be pedophiles. That's what people may read in (I often have my words twisted here as people read in some nefarious intent that is in the reader's head, but not in mine.)
And your last point is the key really. CNN reported on a problem. That is why we have a free press, or why we are supposed to.
It isn't CNN's job to come up with a solution for anything. Nor is it mine, but if Disney (or UNI or SW) wish to hire me, then I'll be glad to offer my thoughts on possible solutions.
The reason I don't find it completely fair is that employees across the board in all industries, family focused or not, are dealing with this problem.
Using the theme park industry as its example is, however an easy way to draw a ton of attention to it.
But it is a much broader issue. A worldwide problem. And the worst part is, it's been going on for thousands of years. (Not meaning for that to be an excuse)
The real news will be in the follow up on the legislation.
I am very surprised, however, that TWDC did not respond in a similar fashion as UNI's "zero tolerance"
No, John. There was no implication in the story that Disney, UNI or SW knowingly hired people known to be pedophiles. That's what people may read in (I often have my words twisted here as people read in some nefarious intent that is in the reader's head, but not in mine.)
And your last point is the key really. CNN reported on a problem. That is why we have a free press, or why we are supposed to.
It isn't CNN's job to come up with a solution for anything. Nor is it mine, but if Disney (or UNI or SW) wish to hire me, then I'll be glad to offer my thoughts on possible solutions.
Which is it? There can't be a real underbelly for the theme park companies if they are not complicit, even if through negligence.My motives are very simple: to expose the ugly underbelly that Disney (and UNI and SW to lesser extents) have when it comes to issues such as this.
I'm honestly questioning this community when so many folks want to defend a corporation instead of asking if Disney (and, again, UNI and SW) did due diligence in hiring these people. Period.
And, yes, a company takes 'some' responsibility for the people it hires, especially if they engage in illegal activity from work.
And, yes, a company takes 'some' responsibility for the people it hires, especially if they engage in illegal activity from work.
How would these companies know without the very sort of surveillance you so dislike?
10 points to Dave for quoting Omar. Indeed.In the words of the legendary stick up boy Omar a Little, "You come at the King, you best not miss."
If that's The best CNN can do, I'm sadly disappointed. You do a story like this, you empty all your guns and fire all your bullets. They didn't do that and they came off like a bad college newspaper.
You know, It would be hilarious if they do a fast forward someday and they add the stories of Dad Bauer and his son in the same 24 type adventures.So......24 Season 10? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
I understand your point but how is this different from breaking a story that sexual predators work at Wal-Mart for example.I wouldn't go that far as I feel it is an issue that should be presented in a larger context.
It's an important story but was presented in a hatchet fashion.
Then you are guilty of protecting such persons for not using your often discussed connections to bring such negligence to the public's attention.That isn't for me to say. I'm not here to work damage control for Disney (or UNI or SW). I absolutely believe they could do better in screening, though, and have been told as much by CMs at all levels for years.
Sounds like they're moving in the same pattern as Foxnews.. trying to remove any "real value" from their news and keep the "opinionated news" as shield.Ding di
agree 100%
Not to mention CNN has little credibility left. This chatter about it being on CNN makes it a big story is off base IMO. The head of CNN himself even recently stated that CNN was moving away from reporting and more into entertainment. They admittedly are less credible as a news source.
Unless your are suggesting that the rest of the story shows that disney was complicit I'm not sure how the rest of there "story" matters.
So......24 Season 10? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
That's the biggest thing I think was missed. It's a giant problem everywhere. They didn't even mention the late May arrest of universal's Capt. America for sending nudie photos to a teen girl he met on the job.
Sloppy and bad journalism.
Totally agree.
And its your last two sentences that are the most important.
I strongly suspect (and sorta know) that Disney spent so much time trying to kill the story that they failed to have a proper response when surpressing (sp?) the news didn't work for them.
I understand your point but how is this different from breaking a story the sexual predators work at Wal-Mart for example.
Just based on the pure size of the company I can say for certain they do with 0 proof what so ever.
Disney is limited in scope by the laws that prevent in depth and continuous probing into individuals backgrounds.
Unless Disney is making federal and local laws I fail to see the point of pointing the finger directly at Disney or universal.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.