dupac
Well-Known Member
Subtraction is just the addition of negative numbers to positive ones...Isn't that kinda like addition by subtraction?
Subtraction is just the addition of negative numbers to positive ones...Isn't that kinda like addition by subtraction?
Both. One way before the other though.So is the talk of Universal's third gate just about the water park....not a regular theme park?
All I can say is they still have plenty of time before the original internal date to open.Slightly off-topic, but I'd love to know what Universal's plan has been re: Potter 2.0 opening date. Has the plan all along been to put it off or what?
It's a good point, I guess I should clarify because things like Sesame Street Land and stuff like that have long existed to anchor kiddy lands.Does this count?
AgreeHarry Potter was the second time an entire intellectual property was set to drive a land. The previous time was Jurassic Park and it wasn't as successful. Yes, it is a great IP, but there certainly was risk.
MDE, magic bands and fast pass plus are working. It does increase capacity. It does save huge sums of money, ask the union. Your question should be will it increase attendance? That is not the same as capacity. If it keeps those staying in the well over 34000 hotel/DVC rooms stay on property just a little more than they do now it will increase attendance.The Street thinks MM+ is increasing park capacity but is it really doing so?
It sounds like that may be King Kong from early reports,
I know the investment in Diagon Alley was substantial relative to the initial Potter investment. Having said that, I agree they're turning into Pixar where for some reason, the public is rooting for a failure so they can make the "first flop" story. It sounds like that may be King Kong from early reports, but I suspect they will still be riding the Phase 2 wave for that to be a problem.
agree with the ice cream place and HE, got a feeling they are going to be nightmare at least for the first six monthsEh, I'm still waiting for non-fanboi opinions on Diagon Alley. I have an uneasy feeling HE's and the ice cream shop's limited capacitieswill be overwhelmed--Anna & Elsa bad--while the rest of the area will feel too much like a retread of Hogsmeade. All with guests in a bad mood because it took hours to get in there, given the horrible infrastructure. In other words, I don't think we can truly judge the area until August or so.
Then again, HHN 2012 and the Beetlejuice revamp were horrible flops but it doesn't seem to have slowed them down any.
MDE, magic bands and fast pass plus are working. It does increase capacity.
He was posting here too? Was he the guy with the duck?
Did you actually read my post or just assume it was anti-Disney and pro-Universal? What does market cap have to do with the question that was posed? The original person was asking how Wall Street views Comcast's investment in their parks. My long winded answer (backed up with actual numbers from last year's 10Ks) was that they don't really focus on it since Theme Parks is a small portion of both revenue and operating income for Comcast. It's an afterthought for them. For Disney, P&R is a much more substantial piece of the overall business. It gets a lot more attention from the street. I'm not sure where you got that I was saying Wall Street loves anyone. Next time try reading the actual post before commenting on it. If you are having trouble with the big words just ask and someone can help you out[QUOTE, post: 6157086, member: 82601"]
I think you missed a very important thing. If wall street loves comcast so much more than Disney, why is comcast market cap 136.1 billion while Disney is 144.26 billion? I guess wall street does love Disney. Wall Street gives Disney a higher PE because they believe Disney profits will grow faster. Why? I thought everyone knew Universal was blowing everyone away in theme parks and profits and that next gen was a financial sink hole. Maybe they know next gen is working and will make huge profits freeing capital for more expansion? No one can deny high PE shows investors are betting their money that Disney is Growing faster than Universal.
This could mean bribery, and no I'm not saying that's happening with Disney. It likely isn't but China is not risk free, you can harm your brand even which we all know how brand obsessed companies are today.
what's more interesting regarding this is how no one has been bashing Uni for their "non official opening day" date for Potter, but everyone sure b*t*hed about Disney when they did the same "dance around" with the mine train opening...
@EricJ is posting on Intercot now, and is the same daft buffoon on there that he was on here. LOL
So are people still going to call this "a win"?@InsideTheMagic
Jason Surrell is gone from Disney, headed for Universal Creative. Guess that means no more Star Wars blogs from him.
@InsideTheMagic
Surrell worked for Universal many years ago in the early years of Halloween Horror Nights. I'm sure he'll fit right back in.
Yes. He was pompous. I'd rather leave a space open for new talent than let him sit on his imaginary high chair.So are people still going to call this "a win"?
Also coincidental about a months worth of Jimmy's posts from March to April were deleted around the time it went down.Could be coincidence, but the combative, pro-Disney Jimmy Thick--who admittedly could be a decent writer--stopped posting around the same time Surrell deleted his Twitter account.
71Jason - One last Jimmy Thick signature for the conspiracy theorists
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.