ParentsOf4
Well-Known Member
I assure you that what you write ("people ... are more focused on pleasing themselves") happened decades ago. There's a reason Baby Boomers sometimes are called the "Me Generation".I am not denying the WDW has changed and for the worst and I agree about the $$. My family has decided to avoid WDW until things change.
However, people have changed. They are less oriented on the group as a whole, are more focused on pleasing themselves and to heck with anyone else, and expect everything immediately. While people may have always felt like acting this way, it seems like people voice it and act on it more today than in the past.
The term was coined in the 1970s and pretty much everything you write was written back then too. Basic human DNA has not appreciably changed in 40 years, or even 4000 years. When it comes to human nature, the expression "there's nothing new under the sun" applies just as much today as it did in the 1970s.
What has changed is society, particularly its institutions. People react to their surroundings and how they are being treated by the government, businesses, etc.
As is frequently reported in the newspapers, there hasn't been such a large separation between The Haves and The Have Nots since the Great Depression. Wages have stagnated while CEOs such as Disney's own Bob Iger collect tens-of-millions and adopt business strategies designed to increase the concentration of wealth among The Chosen Few: higher prices for the masses, far outpacing their growth in income, while wasting net income on tens-of-billions in stock buybacks, providing immediate financial gains to those already owning Disney's $150 billion in stock while returning nothing back into the economy to build for the future.
If people seem to be reacting differently today, then it's because they are being treated differently today.
In the 1970s, WDW was a beacon of happiness exactly because it was like no other place. Roy Disney and Card Walker believed in Walt Disney's vision. They believed in Walt's commitment to providing quality family entertainment at reasonable prices.
When Michael Eisner took charge in 1984, he largely left the parks alone because they were the only division within Walt Disney Productions (soon to be renamed The Walt Disney Company) that was highly profitable. Disney's parks provided outstanding quality at reasonable prices, defying conventional business wisdom.
It wasn't until the mid-1990s that Eisner (and Frank Wells) began to interfere with Walt's winning formula. Still, Disney's theme parks provided relatively good quality at relatively good prices for another decade.
The wheels fell off the Parks & Resorts wagon in the early 2000s when Paul Pressler (immediately followed by Jay Rasulo) became Chairman of Parks & Resorts and began to manage the parks "by the numbers", rather than understanding why the parks had been financially successful for decades.
People have not changed.
The way people are treated at the theme parks has changed.

Last edited: