The Park Formerly Known as Disney's Hollywood Studios? Yep ...

[RSoxNo1]

I think it would be more appropriate as BB-8ship Earth.
View attachment 134022

Looks shopped.

 

[unkadug]

Looks shopped.

No...looks Paint

 

[bhg469]

No...looks Paint

Looks minecrafted!

 

[Wikkler]

That would never work as adding the head would put the structure over 200 feet.

BB-8 has two antennae that are just begging for red lights on them

 

[Wikkler]

Looks shopped.

No...looks Paint

Looks minecrafted!

What are you talking about, this Disney© computer rendering®™℠ is as real as that leaked picture of Frozen Ever After.

 

[bhg469]

I still can't really say for sure whether this is b8 or not, but w/e. When that one IP is arguably the most culturally influential franchise of the 20th century, and the park it's "overrunning" has a grand total of 5 rides operating, yes. I'm not mad about Maelstrom closing for a new attraction. I think a new attraction is due, and that Maelstrom was outdated. But you seemed to have completely lost the entire point of my first response. The reason I don't like it is because Frozen has almost nothing to do with Norway, except that some of the architecture in the film has Norwegian influences. The book it was based on was written by a Danish author. Frozen isn't even set in Norway, it's set in a fictional land of Arendelle. And the ride isn't even going to be anything about Norway. It just doesn't fit.

You're arguing with someone that seems to already be biased against the franchise. Star wars is getting a big chunk of studios, a park that was getting reinvented before Disney fully took over the star wars franchise. Comparing what is happening at studios to what is happening at Epcot is applies to oranges.

I completely agree with you that cartoons do not belong front and center at any WS pavilion. If they're hidden, fine, bury that stuff where people have to experience the pavilion in order to get to their pixie dust glitter fix.

 

[Cesar R M]

Ugh. I have no interest in hurling insults back and forth with a handful of hateful people, who have to bully and chase people out of discussions they weren't a part of to begin with -- just to feel important.

I don't care to be around people like you. So, have at it.

So, you just do on convenience and when you feel it?
Aka, you love to dish but not to receive it?

Guys like you really need to learn to play nicely with others.

Perhaps you need a juice box.

prune juice to "let it go"?

Methinks there are guys who fear strong women around these parts.

Charge ahead, Ms. Siren!

I hope you're being sarcastic. Strong Women != throw insults on convenience then play the victim card when people get back at her.

Please don't worry, I'm not watching you at all. You just keep popping up across the forum.

Thank you for taking the time in the posts above to make your position (and sex) clearer for everyone. I'm sure we can all play nice now.

 

[Cesar R M]

I think it would be more appropriate as BB-8ship Earth.
View attachment 134022

I'm now very tempted to photoshop that.
Give me a day or two XD

 

[Jenstar]

What about Disney's Movie Adventure? I'm not sure if any other parks in the US have a similar name etc, but if not, I think it would be a good fit!

 

[Wikkler]

What about Disney's Movie Adventure? I'm not sure if any other parks in the US have a similar name etc, but if not, I think it would be a good fit!

Just because it fits the central idea of the park doesn't make it a good name.
What would the other parks be named, Disney's Animal Adventure, Disney's Disney Adventure, and Disney's Adventure Adventure?

 

[Nick Wilde]

One shouldn't judge a park by the number of rides it has.

If you want rides, then go to Six Flags.

So you'd be perfectly fine with a park with one attraction?

It actually fits perfectly. The World Showcase is (as Sam Eagle would say), ""A Salute to All Nations, But Mostly America!". No one really cares if the other countries are properly represented or not. The important thing is that the USA is portrayed as the best nation in the entire world. Norway just needs to support the USA by being a fun place to take a few fun photos with Olaf and his friends.

And if Norway (the country) is not happy with that arrangement, then they can renew their sponsorship and have a say in the operation. Norway hasn't sponsored that pavilion since 2002. So I think it's safe to say that we will be seeing a lot more of Olaf!

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.

 

[Truk777]

I kinda think the word 'Galaxy' or 'Galactic" should be in the new name. Maybe Disney's Galaxy of Stars Park or something along that line.

 

[Cesar R M]

Here you go guys!

 

[Wikkler]

Here you go guys!

View attachment 134122

Ah, so the second concept rendering has been released.
What was this thread about again?

 

[unkadug]

So you'd be perfectly fine with a park with one attraction?

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.

Absolutely not...however, there is a difference in "rides" and "attractions".

 

[Haymarket2008]

So with Indy 5 officially getting a release date of July 2019, any chance this could play into DHS' future plans?

 

[ToTBellHop]

So with Indy 5 officially getting a release date of July 2019, any chance this could play into DHS' future plans?

Yep.

 

[BrianLo]

Yep.

So the 3.0 battle is now between Monster Inc. and Indy...?

 

[ToTBellHop]

So the 3.0 battle is now between Monster Inc. and Indy...?

Indy would be the elusive 4.0. As I understand/-stood it. The question was whether or not Indy "could" play into DHS's future plans. It could. But we will lose the stunt show, regardless.

 

[FigmentForver96]

Indy would be the elusive 4.0. As I understand/-stood it.

Let us hope that we get a full phase 3 much less phase 4. You may not be able to discuss this, and this has probably been mentioned before, but how is phase 3 still looking as far as a go for the park?