The Miscellaneous Thought Thread

BasiltheBatLord

Well-Known Member
He cuts off someone's hand and it's written off in the movie as a "childish prank". :bored:
Pan is a weird story cause the morale is kind of a duality of "never grow up, but never be a child forever" sort of like in a limbo state. The resolution of the film (I've never read the original story so I'm guessing it's the same) is Wendy accepting her maturity. She literally says "I'm ready to be a grown up now" or something after her adventures in Never Land. Part of the reason she makes that choice is because she's been there and she's seen what it's like when people truly never accept the responsibility of adulthood. Peter Pan is a child forever, but that also makes him selfish and somewhat sociopathic with no real friends or connections to anybody (his friends are the Lost Boys, all of whom are idiots who blindly follow him, and Tinker Bell, who is literally a fairy made of pixie dust) But on the other hand, Hook and his crew (and the Darling's father, who is like a real world manifestation of Hook) are representations of what happens when adults forget what it's like to be children and are only concerned with the latter half of their lives. For example, Hook's traumatic obsession with the crocodile is an allegory for a middle-aged man obsessed with his death.
 
Last edited:

Kram Sacul

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
Actually, my plan for a Zootopia Splash Mtn was along the lines of: "Zootopia: Judy and Nick's Splashy Backwoods Stake-Out Adventure." Title sounds about right considering Disney's recent attraction naming.

Does it involve attaching pipes and satellite dishes to Chickapin Hill?
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
2xucla.jpg
 

Rich T

Well-Known Member
Pan is a weird story cause the morale is kind of a duality of "never grow up, but never be a child forever" sort of like in a limbo state. The resolution of the film (I've never read the original story so I'm guessing it's the same) is Wendy accepting her maturity. She literally says "I'm ready to be a grown up now" or something after her adventures in Never Land. Part of the reason she makes that choice is because she's been there and she's seen what it's like when people truly never accept the responsibility of adulthood. Peter Pan is a child forever, but that also makes him selfish and somewhat sociopathic with no real friends or connections to anybody (his friends are the Lost Boys, all of whom are idiots who blindly follow him, and Tinker Bell, who is literally a fairy made of pixie dust) But on the other hand, Hook and his crew (and the Darling's father, who is like a real world manifestation of Hook) are representations of what happens when adults forget what it's like to be children and are only concerned with the latter half of their lives. For example, Hook's traumatic obsession with the crocodile is an allegory for a middle-aged man obsessed with his death.
I think Captain Hook fits your theory, but I've always viewed the other pirates as examples of grown men who've never matured emotionally, accepted responsibility or cared for anyone but themselves. They live a life of perpetual childish fantasy with no thought to anything but their own immediate needs. And the Neverland Indians, while smarter than the pirates or Lost Boys, are stuck living their lives as a never-ending game.
 

Rich T

Well-Known Member
Peter Pan really isn't a sympathetic character.
He's like a wonderful, friendly tour guide desperately trying to ignore the darker side of his world. The Disney film only deals with this for about one second (when he snaps the arrow in half), but the play (and the book, which is basically the play) really deal with the sadness of a person who's doomed to always be a child, never able to move on and find the deeper meanings and relationships in life. But he's got the attention span of a little kid, so he never dwells on his situation for long.

"Hook" is a flawed movie, but it was at its best when focusing on that part of the character's past.
 
Last edited:

Rich T

Well-Known Member
Peter Pan is the best Disney movie
That would be Pinocchio (or Zootopia :D). Pan's definitely one of my favorites, though. And, along with Cinderella, it's probably the most solid, crowd-pleasing, good-from-start-to-finish film Disney ever produced. My personal favorite is also from that post-WWII era: Alice in Wonderland, even though it's dramatically the weakest of all the Disney films... next to Black Cauldron. :D
 

Rich T

Well-Known Member
It has a climax and ending, the rest is just fun stuff to look at.
What???? Brer Rabbit leaves his Briar Patch in Search of Adventure. Fox and Bear try to catch him, and finally succeed in the Laughing Place. His family and friends mourn his foolishness. On to the climax. It's all there, it's just told as terribly as Phantom Menace.
 

Rich T

Well-Known Member
I never got that vibe from the ride. The only story elements to me are the ending and climxax.
And I can't blame you for that, because DL's Splash does such a terrible job of conveying the tale it was supposed to tell. (WDW and Tokyo fixed that). It's to the DL ride's great credit that it's so much fun despite that.
 

Rich T

Well-Known Member
Renaissance Disney movies aren't that good.
Little Mermaid and Beauty and the Beast are fantastic. Aladdin's pretty good. Lion King's excellent. I'd say most of the films in that period are far, far better (as films) than anything between Jungle Book and Black Cauldron.
 

Rich T

Well-Known Member
The best Disney animated movie is The Great Mouse Detective.
At the time it came out, it was mind-blowing simply because it was actually good. I (and a lot of other animation fans) sat there in the theater thinking, "Holy Moses, someone at Disney actually knows how to tell a story again!"
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom