Gabe1
Ivory Tower Squabble EST 2011. WINDMILL SURVIVOR
Agree, but more often than not.. Companies have the tendency of downplaying and the advocate groups to exaggerate.
Example of company PR " The Lead in minuscule quantities, like in our products, do not pose a danger to humans"
They claim that ONLY the traces they have int he product isnt dangerous.. But humans could get other traces elsewhere and these "traces" become more than just remnants or "microscopic" units. As lead tends to accumulate on fatty tissues. Lead poisoning can take years to develop.
Then we have "Advocacy" groups, like the morons anti baxers who rely in lies to deny vaccines. (And not on real things, like vaccine allergies). claiming that Vaccines are the end of the world or cause problems that have not been proven in any way (like the "mercury" or amalgams used in vaccines being pure and dangerous and that they develop illnesses. When in reality they are unharmful composites. (aka an idiot trying to claim they are experts in chemistry and playing the "ohhh fire is bad!")
I am a Child Advocate. I have respect for some. Some I do not. I tend to want to see who their sponsors are and where they receive their funding from. Me I am personally fond of Easter Seals in the US for what I do. They helped me a great deal when my DD was non verbal fighting for intervention at age 3. I will forever be indebted to their caring. How I became involved in being a child advocate.
And yeah, vaccines are a genuine cause for concern with humans not wanting them. On the flip side pets are in my opinion and research beyond over vaccinated and my and others opinion that it is big business over the need to be vaccinated every year for kennel cough where humans are only vaccinated twice in a longer lifetime.
So I tend to wait to see where I fall when ever shocking and dramatic data is thrown out there. I tend to want to see all the data, who funds the research etc.