The Chit Chat Chit Chat Thread

donaldtoo

Well-Known Member
I was a 17 year old girl....I paid no attention to the wheels beyond the fact that there were 4 of them, and the tires were pumped up. I'm sure I have pictures somewhere, but no idea where. I remember someone saying the hood ornament was important, too....that got stolen off my car while I was at school. I have suspicions about who did it, but no proof.

When I was a 17-year-old boy, I knew all about those wheels, and many other car-related things…vive la difference…!!!!! :hilarious:
Well, that sucks about the hood ornament… :bored:
But, on the bright side, I found a brand new replacement for you on the interwebs for the low, low price of just $129…!!!!! :hilarious:;)

39546070-F3DB-470C-8578-18E173710866.png
 

Patcheslee

Well-Known Member
I’ve watched the Barrett-Jackson auctions on The History Channel, but, they’re also on something called FYI, which I’m not familiar with.
The cars are mostly high end antique, classic, early muscle car restorations, and the amounts they go for are WAYYYYYYY above my pay grade…!!!!! :greedy::hilarious:

Yep, your bros old job definitely sounds like a hoot to me…!!!!!!! :joyfull:
Mecum is another televised. I've already vowed to attend an auction once I win the PowerBall....
 

donaldtoo

Well-Known Member
I found 2 pictures of my car parked next to my brother's '78 fiat spider convertible. I still regret not buying the convertible. One of my mom's clients had had it since before she got married, but it wasn't practical anymore because they lived out in the country where the roads were unpaved and could be really bad in nasty weather...you really needed 4 wheel drive out there. So she decided to sell it because it was a shame to have it just sitting there....she LOVED that car. She knew I was looking for one, and she was willing to sell it to me for 1500, which was a steal, but I didn't know how to drive stick and the only person I knew with a stick who could teach me was my dad. As a teenage girl, my father and I had a very tenuous relationship and I would break out in a rash just talking to him on the phone. I also knew from my brother's experience that he was not a patient driving teacher. So I passed on the car and my brother snatched it up. It was hilarious because my brother was 6'2" and about 350 pounds, and that car was TINY. His head stuck up over the windshield. He had to push the drivers seat back as far as it would go, and it touched the back seat. We used to cram 4 extra people in that thing to go to the movies. His friend Donna would sit in the passenger seat, pushed all the way forward, I'd sit behind her with my knees against the back of the front seat. My friend Dawn, who was tiny would shove herself in sideways behind the drivers seat with her legs going across my lap, and the German exchange student we squeazed in between us in the back seat. We'd make the 40 mile drive to Gillette like that, and then have to climb out...man we had fun, though. I loved that car, and if I could have driven manual, it would have been mine.

Can't really see the wheel rims, so I don't know if they were the originals or not. But I DID have the hood ornament at that time. Maybe it got stolen when I was in college....now I don't remember. But I obviously had it then, and this looks like the parking lot of the apartment building where my brother and I lived. Or maybe it got stolen in high school and then returned because someone had seen who took it? I had suspicions because I remember a certain classmate drooling over my car...he LOVED old cars and liked to fix them up, and I think he's the one who told me the hood ornament was an important piece on the older cars and that people stole them all the time. And then I think maybe that's when mine went missing? So maybe that's what I'm remembering. In any case, it's there in the picture, so if it was stolen in high school, it was probably him and then he felt bad and returned it. It was so long ago now, I just don't remember. And you can't see the damage on the side because it was on the Driver's side where the lady always drove it into the garage. The drivers side had this nasty scrape all along the side of it.View attachment 641535View attachment 641536

Yep, those are definitely a version of the iconic Chevy Rally Wheels…!!! :)

F093F668-C181-4758-A381-2D95481696C3.jpeg
 

Songbird76

Well-Known Member
It goes learners permit minimum held 6 months-usually do drivers ed at that time, probationary license can get at 16 year and 3 months- time and passenger restrictions apply. After 180 days may have passengers but time restrictions apply until 18. Then at 18 they can have the license upgraded to full license.
But you said a parent can take their kids places even if it's a provisional license, right? Like...I just got my Dutch drivers license in November, so I'd just BARELY be passing my 180 days, even though I'm over 18. I'd be able to drive my kids to school in that time, correct?

I'm just thinking it's sort of strange....that's the whole reason for a learners permit, and the learners permit has those restrictions like you can't drive by yourself. You have to have a person over 18 who has a valid license, and has had that license for at least a year or something? And it's a good rule...inexperienced drivers can be awful. But I guess I don't get the no passenger law. That doesn't make sense to me? Is it because they think passengers are a distraction? Is it to protect passengers in case the driver causes an accident because they are inexperienced? It just doesn't seem very logical to me....it's like a rule just to have a rule. It makes them look like they are doing something, but WHAT? What purpose does it actually serve? Are there statistics about that? Is a car with passengers more likely to get in an accident? Unless there's solid reasoning backed be statistics, it sounds like a ridiculous rule.

Over here, you can't get your license until you are 18, and there are harsher punishments for things like driving under the influence for the first 5 years after you get the license. You can have less alcohol in your system, and I think it's an even lower level if you are under 25. There aren't restrictions on the driving, but if you get pulled over and have alcohol in your system, the consequences are harsher if you are less experienced. You can start taking driving lessons at 16.5, so E will start lessons in November, but you can't take your test until you are at least 17.5, and if you get your license before you're 18, it's like a learners permit. You can't drive without a licensed driver next to you. With as long as it took me to get my license here, I want E to have plenty of time to practice, though she'll have the advantage that she isn't learning a different style of driving.....she's never driven in the US. AND she'll be starting with a GOOD instructor. She won't have to go through a year of lockdowns and starts and stops on lessons, nor a horrible instructor who confuses her and demeans her, and she won't have a language barrier. But she doesn't look forward to driving like most kids do, and that can make it take longer before she feels comfortable. So I want her to have plenty of time to get through her tests and if she's over 18 when she takes them, no matter. But once she has it, I want her to be able to drive a group of her friends to the movies, or for a shopping day in Arnhem, etc.
 

Goofyernmost

Well-Known Member
Have never been to a Universal park, but, sounds like an attraction I definitely would have tried.
It was interesting, preshow anyway, but the actual thing was that you stood and tiered platform looking at a single set and all of a sudden parts of the scene started to fall over, while large invisible wind producing fans and water was introduced creating a very storm like situation as the set pieces fell. Then, of course there was the obligatory chain reaction fire that started because of the storm. Then the lights went back on and we all exited to our left.
 

Patcheslee

Well-Known Member
But you said a parent can take their kids places even if it's a provisional license, right? Like...I just got my Dutch drivers license in November, so I'd just BARELY be passing my 180 days, even though I'm over 18. I'd be able to drive my kids to school in that time, correct?

I'm just thinking it's sort of strange....that's the whole reason for a learners permit, and the learners permit has those restrictions like you can't drive by yourself. You have to have a person over 18 who has a valid license, and has had that license for at least a year or something? And it's a good rule...inexperienced drivers can be awful. But I guess I don't get the no passenger law. That doesn't make sense to me? Is it because they think passengers are a distraction? Is it to protect passengers in case the driver causes an accident because they are inexperienced? It just doesn't seem very logical to me....it's like a rule just to have a rule. It makes them look like they are doing something, but WHAT? What purpose does it actually serve? Are there statistics about that? Is a car with passengers more likely to get in an accident? Unless there's solid reasoning backed be statistics, it sounds like a ridiculous rule.

Over here, you can't get your license until you are 18, and there are harsher punishments for things like driving under the influence for the first 5 years after you get the license. You can have less alcohol in your system, and I think it's an even lower level if you are under 25. There aren't restrictions on the driving, but if you get pulled over and have alcohol in your system, the consequences are harsher if you are less experienced. You can start taking driving lessons at 16.5, so E will start lessons in November, but you can't take your test until you are at least 17.5, and if you get your license before you're 18, it's like a learners permit. You can't drive without a licensed driver next to you. With as long as it took me to get my license here, I want E to have plenty of time to practice, though she'll have the advantage that she isn't learning a different style of driving.....she's never driven in the US. AND she'll be starting with a GOOD instructor. She won't have to go through a year of lockdowns and starts and stops on lessons, nor a horrible instructor who confuses her and demeans her, and she won't have a language barrier. But she doesn't look forward to driving like most kids do, and that can make it take longer before she feels comfortable. So I want her to have plenty of time to get through her tests and if she's over 18 when she takes them, no matter. But once she has it, I want her to be able to drive a group of her friends to the movies, or for a shopping day in Arnhem, etc.
Age requirements are lower in Indiana for a permit and license (FYI not all states have the same age for a permit or license eithe gah).
So as an example DD13 will be doing drivers ed at 15, she'll be able to drive supervised by me, her dad, or licensed instructor. Once she gets her probationary license at 16 years 3 months: She is in a bowling club for school, the first 180 days she can't drive her friends to practice, so no carpooling unless me or a licensed driver over 25 is in the vehicle with her. She can drive by herself though with no supervision during set hours. If she takes longer to get her license, like in your daughter's case 18, she still can't have passengers the first 180 days unless supervised, but no more time of day restrictions. The only way to not have a passenger restriction (excluding immediate family) for 180 days is wait until 21.

Really want to blow someone's mind on the poor logic of the restrictions: I used to be the sober driver once I got my license at 16. So if my friends decided to drink at a party I'd make sure they got home before the sun was up and parents awake. Yes I know we weren't angels lol. Legally I wouldn't have been allowed to do that, even being sober, I would have had my license suspended for driving outside approved hours.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom