DCLcruiser
Well-Known Member
Please let me know when reservations can be booked on open table or MyDE
Patty?Pricing at $100 for 20 mins (3 people) seems about what I was expecting. That seems like a pretty solid balance between over-demand and over-expensive. I may or may not do it, but I'm sure that price-point is right on target.
Is that $100 for 3 guests or $100 per guest?Pricing at $100 for 20 mins (3 people) seems about what I was expecting. That seems like a pretty solid balance between over-demand and over-expensive. I may or may not do it, but I'm sure that price-point is right on target.
$100 for the boat, which seats 3. So the $100 will cover all 3.?
The way @wdwmagic wrote it, It sounds as if $100 for 3 guests, but he'd need to clarify.
"The BOATHOUSE will be offering tours of the Village Lake in an amphicar for $100. The 20 minute cruise has seating for 3 guests, plus the boat captain - guests will not be able to drive themselves."
I would agree. It won't suit everyone, but then this is not a high capacity ride.Pricing at $100 for 20 mins (3 people) seems about what I was expecting. That seems like a pretty solid balance between over-demand and over-expensive. I may or may not do it, but I'm sure that price-point is right on target.
$100 for the boat, which seats 3. So the $100 will cover all 3.
Seems like the contribution margin will be relatively high. However, the low volume capacity will not make it a huge money maker.I would agree. It won't suit everyone, but then this is not a high capacity ride.
Very well may be. But if routine preventative maintenance is performed, major maintenance will be mitigated.Not to be a Duster or nothin' but I bet these old cars are a titch high maintenance as well.
So $33 a person, that's not un-reasonable.
Very well may be. But if routine preventative maintenance is performed, major maintenance will be mitigated.
This is why I say mitigated and not eliminated. Even though failures may not be catastrophic, many minor failures can still be extremely expensive.Regardless.. units not designed for high endurance or high # of hours.. being asked to do so.. not always the best formula.
If it were operated by Disney then yes I could see it as being heavily discounted to guests and AP's, but since its operated by Gibson's there is no reason to. It doesn't matter to Gibson's where the guests come from, as long as they show up.Seems like the contribution margin will be relatively high. However, the low volume capacity will not make it a huge money maker.
This is an attraction that would be well served to offer as free to resort guests and AP's. If the operating costs are divided up and rolled into room cost, the individual increase in room price would be minimal and serve as tool to lure guests to DTD and encourage the guest to spend money on even higher net margin offerings.
I remember reading that they modernized the mechanics and upgraded some components of the amphicars. Im sure they beefed them up a bit mechanically so they can handle it.Regardless.. units not designed for high endurance or high # of hours.. being asked to do so.. not always the best formula.
I remember reading that they modernized the mechanics and upgraded some components of the amphicars. Im sure they beefed them up a bit mechanically so they can handle it.
Particularly when they are 50 years old when they are pushed into commercial use..Regardless.. units not designed for high endurance or high # of hours.. being asked to do so.. not always the best formula.
Dunno - this has got 'swan boats' written all over it IMO. Something tried and then quickly moving onto yesterland...
well unlike the swan boats since this is a paid experience, it will be easy to quantify if it runs at a profit or runs at a loss.Dunno - this has got 'swan boats' written all over it IMO. Something tried and then quickly moving onto yesterland...
Particularly when they are 50 years old when they are pushed into commercial use..
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.