News Test Track to be reimagined

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
A quote I saw somewhere perfectly encapsulates my feelings on the desire to bring a ton of defunct Epcot back: ““deep down people dont really want the same thing from the past again, they really want new things that made them feel the same sense of wonder the original things did”
I don’t think that quote is accurate - if I wanted a new experience I would go somewhere new. Now things need to be updated - when I first rode spaceship earth they showed the “future” and it was 2 kids having a face time call. But when I visit Epcot I do indeed want to ride spaceship earth, hear the voices of Liberty, ride living with the land and most of all - see Illuminations!!!!!
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
I completely disagree and really like the story treatments that they're going for.

If anything, they're doing more of a disservice to the IPs than to DAK.
I agree with this.

I have stated you either sacrafice the integrity of the park, or the character.
Particularly with Indy.

Which is odd and funny because execs want the character or IP so badly, yet they alter and manipulate it to something else for it to fit.
 

Captain Neo

Well-Known Member
I hadn't heard of Memphis before, so I've just looked it up and....yes, looks very familiar!

the swan, dolphin, the team Disney buildings in Anaheim and Orlando, and the Disney HQ in Burbank are all post-modern designs it’s very late 80s/early 90s
 

Captain Neo

Well-Known Member
Other than the interior of WoL, I don't know what else in EPCOT could be considered Memphis. WoL was HEAVILY Memphis inspired though.

Edit: Also the Swan and Dolphin hotel since it was Michael Graves...directly part of the Memphis Group

Here's a video about the Memphis Group if anyone is interested:



‘I guess innoventions and parts of the “Epcot 94” aesthetic
 

jmuboy

Well-Known Member
If we're expected to see humorous scenes of people traveling like we did previously and an updated version of "It's fun to be free" I'd be okay with this...
100% Agree. There are so many humorous scenes from WoM that would still be ironic and funny today. And if just a couple of those old scenes were recreated and added into the new TT3.0 (along with Its Fun to be Free) then I'd be a happy camper.
 

DreamfinderGuy

Well-Known Member
Should we expect audio-animatronics, show scenes featuring different vehicles over the years, and It's Fun to be Free?
I wouldn't expect any of this, seems like an easy way to be let down. They've made no reference or even allusion to any of this being included. Fun to be Free seems highly likely though, I don't know how you would advertise something as World of Motion inspired and not include it.
 

FigmentFan82

Well-Known Member
What’s the budget for this update. That should probably give us an indication of how intricate the updates will be or lack thereof.
Dr Evil One Million GIFs - Find & Share on GIPHY
 

Moth

Well-Known Member
What’s the budget for this update. That should probably give us an indication of how intricate the updates will be or lack thereof.
People were parroting $100 million.

But I don't think that's going entirely towards the ride itself, I think the ride vehicles need general upkeep/updates since I think they're reaching the end of their expected lifespan? So it might be going all-in to keep Test Track well, on TRACK for the next two decades.
 

Jumping Fountains

Active Member
The only explanation I can think of for this is that you maybe watched the Futureport recreation? Other than that I have no idea where you got this from.


I’m on my 40s and certainly experienced this as a child, though it has weirdly been kind of lost in my memory. I absolutely love the old attractions of EPCOT and would still be paying admission for them, as is, if they existed. Truly all-ages accessible, a bit whimsical, and transoportive. I think you’re either an old EPCOT/edutainment type or you’re not and there’s really no kind of way to convey the value of that vision of theme park experiences if it doesn’t resonate with you. I realize this is kind of a non sequitur post - just watching some of that World of Motion ride-through brought up the thoughts!
 
Last edited:

Jumping Fountains

Active Member
As someone who visited Epcot for the first time in the 2000, I was bored. World Showcase was mainly shopping, documentaries and at the time 2 rides. Future World leaned too heavily into the education side so much that we went on Ellen's Energy Adventure, walked through the chaos of Innoventions expecting a ride then went straight to World Showcase before eventually seeing Honey I Shrunk the Audience. It wasn't until the addition of Nemo that we went to the Seas pavilion, and that encouraged us to look at the other pavilions in Future World. It was the injection of IP that actually made it worth visiting these areas of the park, especially now for my family who regularly skip Small World, Figment and Tom Sawyer Island for being too boring
This is a great representation of how many people would have experienced EPCOT. I do think there were enough people who enjoyed what is described (not bored) to not abandon the concept and keep the theme intact. I know my family ended up spending more time in EPCOT once we were, say, over 10. I think of WDW as a portfolio of properties and that each one doesn’t have to appeal equally to visitors. But I’m also not the business owner! ;)
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom