Ugh, semantics. I thought you were above this kind of thing. As you already know, one can apply this sentiment to practically *anything* that exists past the gates -- rides, shows, parades, transportation, bathrooms -- it all falls under the same umbrella.Wait. Do you really think FastPass is free and not built into the cost of everything else?
Next time, you can just say hi to me, it's always a pleasure to talk to you and you're so much better than this.
Ugh. Not you, too. Why are you copying off of lebeau, he can't read so I guess you feel you don't have to read either. Right? Wrong. You have to read, too.Let me get this straight.....you think you get all of that for "free" and Disney doesnt charge you for it?
edit: not only do you pay for it so does everyone else even if they dont use it.
My point is, you don't have to make a additional purchase to use fastpass like you do at every other amusement park in the world.
Thanks @Lee -- you're always a gentleman on this forum. This would be so awful, IMO. So, I hope Disney reconsiders this.I don't think you understand...
Just to be clear, I wasn't referring to a Fastpass in my post.
I can understand limiting those to one per ride.
I was referring to your park ticket determining how often/how many times you would be allowed on an attraction.
For example: Basic Ticket, you get one ride on ToT. Next level up, two rides. Premium Magical Pass, all you can eat.
That is tiered pricing. The more you pay, the more you get to do.
It has nothing to do with locals or multi-visiting obsessed guests. It would effect every person, from the once a week to the once a decade visitor, that steps up to the ticket window and has to decide how many rides they can afford.
Look at it as a high-tech, more expensive version of the old ticket books.
I can hear it now...."Sorry sweetie, we can't meet the princess. We used up all our experiences and I don't have the money to get more. Maybe the dance party will be free..."
Also, since you are an insider at Sea World too -- I just have to tell you that I was shocked to read that Sea World cleaned house over there. I skipped Sea World this year, so I think it is a good thing. It is devastating, with the boom in tourism that Sea World is losing money. And, they only have themselves to blame.
Sea World should not be losing money. I hope the new people are better.
Greed can be so ugly.Certainly.
No way they would ignore that revenue stream.
She understood. She's just paid to say otherwise....
Please leave @Lee alone. He is not here to play games with you. And Mr. Spirit is very sensitive about this kind of nonsense in his threads.
This discussion is for people who are serious about Disney. There are countless other threads, with people who are dying to play your boring little games with you.
It's not nice to call names, even in this instance, where you are clearly talking about yourself. It's a bad look for you and this forum.And still I'm sure the dingbat will think it's a great idea.
Look at how @Lee conducts himself, this is what you should strive for.
It would never work.Hey at least they found a way to deal with capacity......I think the backlash from this would be unprecedented.
I like the all inclusiveness and the dining plan back when it included tips. I just don't like "free dining", this is what ruined everything.Just dont know what to think about this anymore. Disney created this mess. First they made a visit to WDW "all-inclusive", they invented the DDP, My Magic Way ticket system, even the transportation system. All to be all-inclusive to attract the budget minded guest.The once in a lifetime visitor. Now IF this was to come to fruition it changes the basic fundamental way the average person visits. You are standing there with little Johnny and little Susie and they are fresh out of FP,s and they want to do RNR roller coaster or a M&G with their favorite ice princess. Well mommy and daddy now has to dig a little deeper and go over budget or their little snowflakes will have a major meltdown. To provide that once in a lifetime experience they go to the well and spend more then they wanted to. The parents may do it the one time but they will avoid that scenario to ever happen again. Thus not returning to the land of the upcharge. Disney now is changing their business model to attract the whales. Just a short sighted attempt to temporarily show profits as some have pointed out.
I don't think inclusiveness is a problem -- it's DVC that's problematic. DVC people have committed to pay Disney top dollar for decades, whether they actually visit or not. Disney is guaranteed this money -- substantial money, whether they invests in the parks or not.
This is why Disney does not have to compete on the same platform as other amusement parks that must build new rides in order to bring in customers.
It's just so bizarre to me because there is no other theme park in the world that practices this model. Disney's E-tickets failed for a reason, it makes no sense for Disney to explore this again.Yes, the way it was described to me was that a base ticket would give you a set number of rides on each attraction like two per day on a "C" and one per day on an "E."
To get more rides would require a higher level of ticket or an incremental purchase.
I totally believe you. I remember when Disney was testing FastPass only for a meet and greet. And, they received a huge backlash from that, so Disney better go in a different direction because this is a nightmare.I have no clue when/if this ever rolls out.
They may well go another direction, but this is a legit option that is/has been discussed.