NateD1226
Well-Known Member
oof.I hope they’re not retooling Stitch’s Great Escape for the remakeBring on Chairman Clench! Or Alien Zoo
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Rumor Stitch's Great Escape Replacement— Don’t Hold Your Breath
- Thread starter Magic Feather
- Start date
NateD1226
Well-Known Member
Here is a longer post than oof. lolI hope they’re not retooling Stitch’s Great Escape for the remake
I doubt they would do this because the film has barely started to write the script. This movie probably wont come out until 2022-2023. They wouldn't leave an attraction empty for 5 years. The most they would do with this movie at the parks is bringing back the characters for a M&G
WDWTank
Well-Known Member
Thank goodness!
Chomama
Well-Known Member
It’s bareky tolerable in version 1.0
Saying something is a "live action remake" (LAR) is way too vague for what's happening.
First, there's fidelity to the original. BatB and JB LARs were mostly a complete remake with some monor changes to tie up some plot points or assign motivations with a more modern sensibility (with varying degrees of success). OTOH, Maleficent and AiW introduced whole new plots and story lines making them not very much of a "remake."
Then there's the "live" part of "live-action." That's normally in reference to live, in-the-flesh human beings acting live in front of a camera. But many of these LARs still have some animation (which is not 'live') such as Cinderella LAR or even mostly animated as CGI as in JB or the upcoming Lion King which will have, supposedly, nothing live.
In conclusion, "remake" should be for making the same movie again. That's just standard industry terminology. If it's not a remake, then it should be referred to as "based on."
"Live action" should mean not animated. If it's now CGI, say so, not "live action." And if it's mixed (or 'hybrid'), then say it's a mixed live action and CGI movie.
First, there's fidelity to the original. BatB and JB LARs were mostly a complete remake with some monor changes to tie up some plot points or assign motivations with a more modern sensibility (with varying degrees of success). OTOH, Maleficent and AiW introduced whole new plots and story lines making them not very much of a "remake."
Then there's the "live" part of "live-action." That's normally in reference to live, in-the-flesh human beings acting live in front of a camera. But many of these LARs still have some animation (which is not 'live') such as Cinderella LAR or even mostly animated as CGI as in JB or the upcoming Lion King which will have, supposedly, nothing live.
In conclusion, "remake" should be for making the same movie again. That's just standard industry terminology. If it's not a remake, then it should be referred to as "based on."
"Live action" should mean not animated. If it's now CGI, say so, not "live action." And if it's mixed (or 'hybrid'), then say it's a mixed live action and CGI movie.
THE Monorail Lime
Well-Known Member
Pink elephants?
ElBendro
Well-Known Member
Did people say the same about WoL pavillion? Then again I guess it hosts festivals now.
20K?
Eisner had his direct-to-video folly. "Live action" remakes is Iger's.
KBLovedDisney
Well-Known Member
I think they are running out of ideas.
I think they are running out of ideas.
There are plenty of ideas. But new ideas and concepts involve risk, and the directive from Iger is "de-risk".
KBLovedDisney
Well-Known Member
So, they pretty much don't want to "invest" in possible incredible new ideas.
Got it.
Thanks IGOR.
Last edited:
SpoiledBlueMilk
Well-Known Member
Wow - that's a bad fan photoshop poster....
rle4lunch
Well-Known Member
I don't know about that. They like to let crappy stuff languish in some sort of hazy nostalgic stasis hell for decades. Or bring something out of retirement to be a 'limited run' (read: cheap placeholder cuz we don't have a clue what we're doing) for 5 damn years (Micheal Jackson's Captain EO comes to mind, *shudder*)
Last edited:
DisneyJayL
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
You mean to tell me no more Stitch?
Oh just a rumor. NO?
Oh just a rumor. NO?
MotherOfBirds
Well-Known Member
They can just use the Stitch AA to replace Sunny Eclipse. He can serenade us with Elvis songs while we provide our own hotdog burps.
Is the SGE space big enough to accommodate a show, a la Philharmagic? A show in TL wouldn't go amiss, and MiLF can get moved/ditched for a ride. If SWSA could fit in that little shoebox of a space, then something can fit in the MiLF space.
Is the SGE space big enough to accommodate a show, a la Philharmagic? A show in TL wouldn't go amiss, and MiLF can get moved/ditched for a ride. If SWSA could fit in that little shoebox of a space, then something can fit in the MiLF space.
ppete1975
Well-Known Member
I don't want to lose sonny eclipse, but somewhere in one of the parks a stitch elvis singing songs sounds amazing!!! That's the stuff that make people like stitch. Unfortunately they got his attraction wrong.
FigmentJedi
Well-Known Member
Lilo and Stitch is a treasure and it speaks to how terrible Great Escape is that it tarnishes that film's legacy around here.It’s bareky tolerable in version 1.0
ElBendro
Well-Known Member
I don't know how many L&S fans I've told to just skip it. Love Stitch, absolutely hate that ride.
