britain
Well-Known Member
You're talking about a small 'traditional' hotel. This one needn't have any windows to the outside world. It could be built right up against the back of the battle escape building.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Star Wars Land announced for Disney's Hollywood Studios
- Thread starter CheekBoys
- Start date
You're talking about a small 'traditional' hotel. This one needn't have any windows to the outside world. It could be built right up against the back of the battle escape building.
danlb_2000
Premium Member
Yes, which would put it in the area I marked. I was referring to the small triangle of land between World Drive and the current entrance road. That alone would not be big enough. Putting it behind battle escape would be a good idea because it could share parking with the rest of the park.
jt04
Well-Known Member
I think it could also be connected to costuming. The hotel building easily providing a LA skyline forced perspective backdrop for grand ave..
It will be outside of the park perimeter.
danlb_2000
Premium Member
How are you defining "park perimeter"? What he describes would technically be outside the park perimeter.
Beyond the service road, fire lane and security perimeter. Not to mention the rear of Alcatraz will have a utility / service area.
The entrance road will be dead space once the new entrance is built.
Service roads can be moved so as to go around the new building, thus defining a new perimeter. Or, an overpass walkway can go over the service road.
This is why I don't discount the triangle, or part of it, as usable.
But, AFAIK, no definite site has been proposed or rumored.
deWild
Well-Known Member
Forgive me if it’s obvious, but what triangle do you refer to as usable? I’m assuming it’s right around the blue circle that danlb_2000 posted?
As for the dead space after the new entrance is opened, does anyone know if there are plans to scrap the entrance off World Drive? Seems like having three gates (one for buses off Buena Vista Dr., one for guests off Osceola Pkwy., and the original off World Dr.) would be a tad unnecessary.
danlb_2000
Premium Member
I have seen a document that says the current entrance from World Drive will be removed.
AEfx
Well-Known Member
Time to start a business that requires frequent trips to Orlando!Can Disney bloggers write off their travel expenses to the parks?
My boyfriend is starting a new gourmet food company and the first thing I said was - we can write off WDW if we go to the F&WF!!!!!
deWild
Well-Known Member
Nice! Thanks for the confirmation. You must watch those permits like a hawk! I wonder now, with the entrance and road from World Drive being removed in the future, could the park expand all the way to Osceola Parkway? Google Maps shows quite a bit of room there, but SWL and the new parking lots look like they might block this theory from coming to fruition.
Horizons '83
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
bioreconstruct has some updates for Star Wars and Toy Story Lands... just FYI
motox7
Active Member
So with the laying off of the Previous EP. 9 director, and J.J. now on to direct ep. 9, it looks like Disney has now pushed the date of its release back to the typical December period that all the films have been following, in 2019. It was slated to release in May 2019, which would have put it right after or before SW:GE opening up out in Anaheim. I know this was not fully a coincidence that they were going to be both being open to the public at the same time. I wonder what this could mean as far as Anaheims opening up now. I have to imagine nothing will change, but at the same time I wonder if any key plot points were built into the stories of the attractions or land itself. Will be interesting to see how this all works out and if anything is affected by this change in release date.
Jason Lake
Member
Please don't pull a Kylo and shove a light saber through me but why dose everyone keep calling it Alcatraz?
Before the general type of attraction was announced (and even before SWL was announced), Disney used (and still uses) code names for projects. The code name for the SWLs was "Delos," the company name from West World. And the code name for the battle starship escape attraction is "Alcatraz." And the code name for the Millenium Falcon ride is "Big Bird."
The code name for TSL is "Ascot," a reference to Barbie's Ken's ascot. The code name for the new Mickey ride is "M" for "Marcelline." The code name for the gondolas is "TIJ" for The Italian Job."
The code name for the new GotG ride is "S", but, insiders haven't spilled what that stands for yet. As you can see, the code names and letters aren't always obvious, otherwise, it wouldn't be a very good code.
Jason Lake
Member
WOW, thanks so much I had no idea they did this and I actually love it. Its pretty much the same thing they do with upcoming movies.
For the GotG ride could the "S" stand for Star-Lord or is that to obvious...
For the GotG ride could the "S" stand for Star-Lord or is that to obvious...
Much too obvious.
SpoiledBlueMilk
Well-Known Member
Oh no doubt that they will have to, remember Potter's opening day?
And arguably Star Wars is much larger fan base than Potter. (and thats saying something...)
Yeah - I'm going to be going to this like some people go to church.
TP2000
Well-Known Member
The code name for the new GotG ride is "S", but, insiders haven't spilled what that stands for yet. As you can see, the code names and letters aren't always obvious, otherwise, it wouldn't be a very good code.
The WDI code name for Guardians of the Galaxy: Mission - BREAKOUT! at DCA was "Slammer". As in breaking out of the slammer, which is the whole plot of DCA's Guardians ride.
If the Epcot version of Guardians has a code name that starts with "S", then it seems likely that code name is also Slammer. And that may give us a clue that the Epcot version will be much like the DCA version.