Animaniac93-98
Well-Known Member
No one's ever really gone.
Can't read this without thinking of this
No one's ever really gone.
I am going to continue to watch and complain about it because it is a stupid trope that ruins the impact of a character's previous death scene and arc. It is lazy story telling and screenwriting. I will call it out every time.Its going to be used, if you don't like then don't watch. To complain about it after 1. its already been used in the films for over 10 years, and 2. that its part of the source material is just plain silly and really just shouting into the wind.
There are literally millions of fans that have no issue with them using this common comic trope. So I doubt they're going to stop using it.
That was the funniest thing in the series next to Wanda driving around in a 2017 Verano.I think Wizard of Oz references are overdone and unnecessary, but I'd be lying if this shot didn't amuse me:
View attachment 537719
He was arrested because his plan was to kill Wanda and destroy "Hex" Vision in order to have "his" Vision he could control, he admitted it right to Jimmy. As for why the FBI can arrest him, SWORD is not above all laws, the FBI is still the domestic law enforcement agency even in the MCU.
I don't think it's really a big concern for the MCU.
Characters aren't going to come back from death very often because actors will age out or simply be ready to move on from the MCU. You're almost certainly not going to see Tony Stark resurrected, for one.
From Jesus to Lazarus to fairies and wizards, bringing a character back from the dead is common theme and trope used since the beginning of storytelling.I am going to continue to watch and complain about it because it is a stupid trope that ruins the impact of a character's previous death scene and arc. It is lazy story telling and screenwriting. I will call it out every time.
...and?
Wanda is a terrorist and wanted fugitive. If Hayward blew her to pieces he would be doing Jimmy a favor.
Except its literally against the Sokovia Accords for him to create or even deploy White Vision for this purpose unless directed to do so by the UN. Him doing it in secret and without permission is why he got arrested.As for acquiring/fixing a working Vision weapon, assuming SWORD is an analogue to the CIA or DARPA, doing this kind of thing is Hayward's job.
I don't think it's really a big concern for the MCU.
Characters aren't going to come back from death very often because actors will age out or simply be ready to move on from the MCU. You're almost certainly not going to see Tony Stark resurrected, for one.
However given this is comic based films, its not unreasonable to think at some point they may "reboot" a character with a different actor. Given enough of a timeline even Tony coming back might be possible using a different actor. Or there is the old comic trope of another character using the same mantle, or different multiverse versions, etc. Anyways many ways for them to use this trope within the MCU and still not be overdoing it.This. We'll see plenty of deaths that will "stick" in the MCU. And to date the only fake out in terms of death has been Loki (albeit twice). I don't recall anyone else dying and then being resurrected - and no not counting the snap, which was a much more unique circumstance. Okay, I guess there's Colson is you are including TV but that seems increasingly non-canon for the movies.
Anyway, I don't see Iron Man or Black Widow (or Quicksilver) coming back to life in the post-Infinity War world. Vision returning always seemed possible as he was a machine and so could he really be "dead"?
I agree that they shouldn't overuse non-permanent deaths, but sporadic and reasonable uses are fine. And I'm also fine with doing any sort of prequels (like the Black Widow movie) where you see more of a character before they die. That said, I prefer seeing fewer character die in general - I think the whole concept of "characters need to die to show there are stakes" to be silly in a fantasy film where it's all clearly made up and you know the good guys are ultimately gonna win. I don't need to have my superheroes be dark and gloomy to prove they are serious or adult or whatever.
It's only against he Sokovia Accords if you get caught. Nosy Jimmy is messing everything up!Except its literally against the Sokovia Accords for him to create or even deploy White Vision for this purpose unless directed to do so by the UN. Him doing it in secret and without permission is why he got arrested.
You can say that about any criminal activity.It's only against he Sokovia Accords if you get caught. Nosy Jimmy is messing everything up!
Having the FBI arrest someone who's probably in the joint chiefs of staff for running a black project is just lazy writing, or maybe a way to avoid having to actually merc someone on a Disney+ show.
I was reminded of the end of Monty Python and the Holy Grail where a bunch of rozzers arrest King Arthur.
By treating Wanda’s story as one about grief, loss, and healing, Marvel denied me the chance to connect my comic book knowledge to the movies. Do you think we read comic books for fun? NO. We read them so we can amass a bunch of knowledge about storylines and then feel secure that we’re ahead of the curve when the movies come along to repeat those storylines. I haven’t been burned this badly by Marvel since The Mandarin turned out to be just an actor in Iron Man 3. Why would you play with my expectations, Marvel? To surprise me? To bring me joy? The only joy I feel is when my fan theories are proved correct so that people know I’m smart.
However given this is comic based films, its not unreasonable to think at some point they may "reboot" a character with a different actor. Given enough of a timeline even Tony coming back might be possible using a different actor. Or there is the old comic trope of another character using the same mantle, or different multiverse versions, etc. Anyways many ways for them to use this trope within the MCU and still not be overdoing it.
Isn't the new iron man going to be Riri williams , aka Ironheart ?I don't think that would work well in a cinematic/television setting with real actors. That's the one thing that I think actually would turn off general audiences. People generally aren't going to want to see a new actor version of Tony Stark. Most comic fans probably wouldn't have any issue, but the MCU doesn't make billions of dollars off the backs of hardcore comic fans.
Yes.Isn't the new iron man going to be Riri williams , aka Ironheart ?
I don't think that would work well in a cinematic/television setting with real actors. That's the one thing that I think actually would turn off general audiences. People generally aren't going to want to see a new actor version of Tony Stark. Most comic fans probably wouldn't have any issue, but the MCU doesn't make billions of dollars off the backs of hardcore comic fans.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.