that's what I was thinking. It was in the last line of the book.The sentence immediately before that is where Harry says the scar hadn't hurt him in nineteen years. "All was well" followed that.
I actually do too. That was so sad that she broke them apart.I want to know about George and how he went on without his twin.
It's on Sunday too.wait...I thought dateline was tonight.
oohh...thanks!It's on Sunday too.
She said it had been for the longest time, but when it came down to it, she decided to change.:shrug:Question:
Whatever happened to the last word of the last book being 'scar'?
I remembered another question that occurred to me. She makes a big deal in the book about how Harry's cloak offers perfect concealment, but just a few chapters before, the Bathilda-snake senses Harry and Hermione underneath it in Godric's Hollow and gets them to follow her/it back to the house.
And then in Book 4, isn't it a recurring theme that the fake Mad-Eye seems to know when Harry is there, even though he's under his cloak?
The only thing I can think of is that they "sensed" Harry under the cloak without actually seeing him...but that still doesn't seem like perfect concealment to me. :shrug:
Oh, I'm brimming with questions today....
How did Dumbledore beat Grindelwald in a duel when Grindelwald was using the Elder Wand? Was the "unbeatable wand" part something assigned to it by legend, when in reality it was just the world's most powerful wand? That would leave some room for an immensely skilled wizard with a less powerful wand to defeat it. If it was truly unbeatable, though, it could never be won in a duel, right? Only through treachery or surprise.
Someone just told me that, roughly translated, "Xenophilius" means "lover of strange things." How fitting.
Also, I think Voldemort should have hidden the diadem in the CoS...it would have been safer because, you (allegedly) have to be a parselmouth to get in.
Is anyone else bothered by the fact that Ron was able to open the CoS??? Also, I think Voldemort should have hidden the diadem in the CoS...it would have been safer because, you (allegedly) have to be a parselmouth to get in.
Your overconfidence will be your downfall.But Voldemort was under the impression that he was so clever hiding the diadem where he did because he thought he was the only one that knew where that hiding place was located. It hadn't occurred to him that anyone else had ever found the Room of Requirement looking that way. So from his point of view, that was the safest place to put it. He didn't realize that tons of students has already found it and that was why it had been so full of stuff in the first place. Just goes to show that even dark wizards can out think themselves.
That bugged me as well. Speaking parseltongue does not sound like something you can hear once and try and repeat it, let alone actually get it right!Is anyone else bothered by the fact that Ron was able to open the CoS??? Also, I think Voldemort should have hidden the diadem in the CoS...it would have been safer because, you (allegedly) have to be a parselmouth to get in.
Jo has apparently done some serious research while writing Harry Potter.
Is anyone else bothered by the fact that Ron was able to open the CoS??? Also, I think Voldemort should have hidden the diadem in the CoS...it would have been safer because, you (allegedly) have to be a parselmouth to get in.
Very. Although the book was brilliant, there were a few moments like this one where I feel she just went for a quick solution....I mean, doesn't Ron say something like he had listened to Harry very closely and figured out how to say it himself?? It was kind of a cop out.
If she'd spent a little less time focusing on the dragged out months of despair in hiding, and a little more time giving us improved versions of scenes such as this one, it would have been perfect.
As it stands, it still blew me away though :sohappy:
Is the Scar gone? Was it gone when Harry died? Is it still around now? I don't remember if it was said?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.