Interesting Twitter thread from Dave Ensign, i.e. Hoot from Horizons end-of-days backstage documentation fame. Not known for his ebullient praise of recent Disney moves, it seems he’s possibly heard some details of the makeover, and seems impressed.
Interesting Twitter thread from Dave Ensign, i.e. Hoot from Horizons end-of-days backstage documentation fame. Not known for his ebullient praise of recent Disney moves, it seems he’s possibly heard some details of the makeover, and seems impressed.
Maybe he broke into a Disney warehouse at night and saw all the new AAs!!
I read it as expanding on his immediately preceding sentence: “I don't think they can do anything that can match the genus of Walt Disney.” By this standard, anything post-Walt falls short.I’m curious what he means by “we fell short 32 years ago, it grew on us, and now we’re going to miss it”. Fell short on what?
Yeah I think you're right on what he ment on that but the way he worded it kind of was confusing. Also if his standard is anything Post- Walt is subpar the last worthwhile ride was Haunted Mansion in Disneyland.I read it as expanding on his immediately preceding sentence: “I don't think they can do anything that can match the genus of Walt Disney.” By this standard, anything post-Walt falls short.
If Dave Ensign has praises for this, then we're definitely in for a treat.
More efficient spending could result in more projects and more fully realized parks.Disney’s projects are not cheap. You may not like the results, but lack of spending isn’t the issue.
I would agree that this was pushed forward because of an online narrative, but calling this the worst decision Disney ever made and including Toad as your reference point reduces the impact of your opinion. This decision actually has a real world reason behind the decision. In your mind, you're losing a favorite attraction (as you did with Toad), but the switch itself in both cases made sense for the parks. In the case of Toad to Pooh it was to utilize a more marketable character. In the case of Splash to Tiana it was a function of society better understanding the source material.Regardless...its still mind numb and ever so..lobotomised thinking to even consider this redo. Literally no one at Disney will speak up and say,,oh yeah, this is my idea..lol. Literally.. thee worst decision Disney ever made since and maybe even as much as removing toad from MK.. Carl Sagan would even be stumped by this decision or rationalization..lol
My friends wife and I had a discussion about Splash and Epcot did come up. She's pro retheme and is all for adding IP to the world showcase and I'm against both. Her stance for both changes are people don't care about the old so you might as well change it now with Splash maybe I can see that viewpoint (I don't agree but that's an argument I can go yeah makes sense) with Epcot though I told her that Fundamentally changes the purpose of the park of makeing it a world's fair with no end.I would agree that this was pushed forward because of an online narrative, but calling this the worst decision Disney ever made and including Toad as your reference point reduces the impact of your opinion. This decision actually has a real world reason behind the decision. In your mind, you're losing a favorite attraction (as you did with Toad), but the switch itself in both cases made sense for the parks. In the case of Toad to Pooh it was to utilize a more marketable character. In the case of Splash to Tiana it was a function of society better understanding the source material.
Splash Mountain is my favorite ride in the Magic Kingdom and there is a big part of me that hates to see it go away. I also don't know if Princess and the Frog is the right choice for a replacement (at least in Florida). But my point of view on this has been remarkably consistent. They can't do this poorly. This needs to be an excellent attraction, and thankfully for Tiana and friends, the ride path and length give them an opportunity to do great things.
As for the worst decision in the history of WDW I would point to EPCOT decisions, mainly those that mark the death of that park. Frozen to Maelstrom and Illuminations to Harmonious (ultimately) were the lynchpins for EPCOT's downfall. For me, Frozen to Maelstrom was the worst decision in my lifetime because it did a disservice to the Frozen franchise and a disservice to EPCOT. That's far more egregious to me than anything else they've done since 1982.
If Splash goes down for the refurb in early 2024, will it be ready to open on the announced "late 2024" timeframe?From what I’ve heard, TRON opens late Fall 2022, Splash has its normal winter refurb and stays open as Splash for 2023 before closing for the conversion starting Winter 23-24 (it’ll be closed awhile).
Maybe "Late 2024" is when it arrives, as in closes? We won't know until it happensIf Splash goes down for the refurb in early 2024, will it be ready to open on the announced "late 2024" timeframe?
No, opens in "Late 2024"...Maybe "Late 2024" is when it arrives, as in closes? We won't know until it happens
Heard from insiders tonight: Splash remake is off due to Space being remade in Tokyo and the upcoming Tommorowland remake in California.
Apologies for the late reply, but allow me to expand on my previous post:
From what I was told, the desicion to redo Space in Tokyo killed remaking Splash over there for good, which in turn severely hurt Orlando (They wanted to have MK's Splash cloned there, but Tokyo told them to bug off) to the point of most likely killing their redo. Then California, IF what I heard was correct, was killed off by other projects taking presidence (Toontown, Tarzan, Tommorowland...)
I was also told that the fact Splash isn't changing wouldn't be announced publicly (It'd just kind of fade out) and that was due to trying to avoid a huge wave of backlash.
No. I think it is closing this winter now. But until they announce, who knows?If Splash goes down for the refurb in early 2024, will it be ready to open on the announced "late 2024" timeframe?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.