I would have been in favor in just completely shutting down MK!Technically we are about 2 years past its the closing date considering how racist and problematic the ride is. It should have been shuttered immediately .
Last edited:
I would have been in favor in just completely shutting down MK!Technically we are about 2 years past its the closing date considering how racist and problematic the ride is. It should have been shuttered immediately .
It's been said many times that the liklihood of closing it before year's end is slim.They have kept this ride open for this long. If they close it down before years end to hep w the Christmas and New years crowds they should be ashamed. I dont care if Tron opens toMorrow. And ive gone every year for Thanksgiving etc. its far from too cold to ride it so thats excuse isnt going to fly eitherā¦
Especially because they barely expanded on it - like, we know the attraction's name now, but the only other thing they added to what we knew was that it's coming in LATE 2024. People are acting like Anika Noni Rose's 2024 mention forced their hand or something. They barely told us anything that we didn't already know, it's not like they're doing damage control.A full fledged, nation wide, social and TV media promotion with an official time frame opening is āa knee jerk reactionā?
I donāt buy that at ALL.
Since when do Disney dates mean anything?Especially because they barely expanded on it - like, we know the attraction's name now, but the only other thing they added to what we knew was that it's coming in LATE 2024. People are acting like Anika Noni Rose's 2024 mention forced their hand or something. They barely told us anything that we didn't already know, it's not like they're doing damage control.
If this is reactionary, it feels way less like "QUICK, now we HAVE to throw something together!" and more like "IDK, we might as well make it official since it's already out there".
Correct me if I am wrong, but the location of this promotion was 1) at the Essence Fest, and 2) on their social media channels. I don't think they purchased commercials or started advertisements or anything of the like. It's like they were posting ads during the F1 races. Not to suggest this means they don't currently have a plan, but it's not on the same level as a massive ad buy.A full fledged, nation wide, social and TV media promotion with an official time frame opening is āa knee jerk reactionā?
I donāt buy that at ALL.
This is wandering off topic, but I think I'm one of the few who might even rate the DLP version of Pirates a little below the MK version. The facade and whole area around it is fantastic and the queue is also great. For me, though, the Paris version feels more like a theme park ride and lacks the atmosphere of the other versions that seem to unfold in a more meandering, mysterious fashion. One big flaw in Paris is that they take you up a lift hill early on and you can look down on scenes unfolding later in the ride. That kind of blows the whole thing for me as where are you supposed to be? The upper ocean looking down on a town that sits on the lower ocean?The queue at MK is indeed longer, more richly themed, and transports you before the ride even begins in a way that Disneyland's does not. Unfortunately, it is one of the places where WDW's Pirates has had a noticeable decline over its lifespan, but it is still also the place where a Disneylander would likely be most impressed by the Florida Pirates. Even having lost some of its richness, the WDW Pirates Queue is still worthy of envy.
Disneyland Paris got nearly the best of both worlds in this regard - their queue is remniscent of WDW's (a bit shorter, I think, but even more richly themed), and then the ride proper is a restructured version of Disneyland's attraction (I think also slightly shorter, or perhaps just a little faster), featuring both the full Town scenes as well as a Cavern sequence at the end that is closer to Disneyland's in substance than WDW's shortened caves. They also have a great Fortress Facade that outdoes the WDW exterior, and the Adventureland surrounding the attraction absolutely adds to the feel of the whole thing.
That's . . . all the more reason my point stands.Since when do Disney dates mean anything?
Well i dk if you want to call it a conspiracy but there was NO way they had real serious plans to change this ride to Tiana before the fake outrage on social media happenedā¦.That's . . . all the more reason my point stands.
Anika Noni Rose said the retheme was coming in 2024 in her interview. Disney knows that's either gonna happen or it isn't, and that these days more than ever dates and timelines are subject to change. So why would her comment make them feel the need to rush to respond, and how on earth would them being like "Yes, it's gonna be late 2024, and BTW here's the new name" qualify as a knee-jerk reaction?
Some people are acting like there's a conspiracy here, but they basically just said "Yep" and kept moving.
They do make some sense of the uphill portion of the ride, though it is a little convoluted (and now a little more confused by the presence of the Davy Jones/Blackbeard Projection).This is wandering off topic, but I think I'm one of the few who might even rate the DLP version of Pirates a little below the MK version. The facade and whole area around it is fantastic and the queue is also great. For me, though, the Paris version feels more like a theme park ride and lacks the atmosphere of the other versions that seem to unfold in a more meandering, mysterious fashion. One big flaw in Paris is that they take you up a lift hill early on and you can look down on scenes unfolding later in the ride. That kind of blows the whole thing for me as where are you supposed to be? The upper ocean looking down on a town that sits on the lower ocean?
Completely agree, and in fact it was the Paris version that gave me a new appreciation for the WDW version after years of always thinking of it mostly according to the stereotype of a rushed and truncated version of the DL version.It's a thrilling interpretation to witness, but I wouldn't call it perfect. Your post sort of goes back to my original idea that WDW's Pirates is better than it gets credit for, because it does a lot of seemingly small things right that DLP's doesn't always pick up on.
Completely agree, and in fact it was the Paris version that gave me a new appreciation for the WDW version after years of always thinking of it mostly according to the stereotype of a rushed and truncated version of the DL version.
That's not to say I don't like the Paris version, though, and I agree with all of your observations of its strengths and weaknesses. I really feel that even just sealing up those views from the upper level of the ride would go a long way to addressing the theme parky feel of the Paris version and the sense that you're floating around a giant warehouse. One of the most impressive things about the DL version in particular is how the hide the ceilings, but in Paris they don't do a great job of that.
I also feel the announcement was to dispel the rumors that the current version of Splash Mountain would remain in the parks and that the retheme was cancelled.Especially because they barely expanded on it - like, we know the attraction's name now, but the only other thing they added to what we knew was that it's coming in LATE 2024. People are acting like Anika Noni Rose's 2024 mention forced their hand or something. They barely told us anything that we didn't already know, it's not like they're doing damage control.
If this is reactionary, it feels way less like "QUICK, now we HAVE to throw something together!" and more like "IDK, we might as well make it official since it's already out there".
Your post sort of goes back to my original idea that WDW's Pirates is better than it gets credit for, because it does a lot of seemingly small things right that DLP's doesn't always pick up on.
Rose said it on a Disney owned network responding to a question that was clearly staged/baited. Which is sonweird because they could obviously just announce it, buy they've been so cagey about it the entire time.Especially because they barely expanded on it - like, we know the attraction's name now, but the only other thing they added to what we knew was that it's coming in LATE 2024. People are acting like Anika Noni Rose's 2024 mention forced their hand or something. They barely told us anything that we didn't already know, it's not like they're doing damage control.
If this is reactionary, it feels way less like "QUICK, now we HAVE to throw something together!" and more like "IDK, we might as well make it official since it's already out there".
He's said that but also that "Disneyland will sometimes be a museum".I mean, weāve had Splash Mountain for what, over 30 years now? Thatās a pretty good run for any theme park ride. Didnāt Walt himself say that the parks would always be evolving? I for one am totally fine with the retheme of this.
Well, Splash will live for eternity in endless YouTube videos, so thereās the museum.He's said that but also that "Disneyland will sometimes be a museum".
Hasnāt this question already been answered and responded to multiple times?Letās stick to Splash. What is the reason for the refurbishment?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.