Disney Analyst
Well-Known Member
If you never went before 2006, you didn't see the Pirates that was intended for Florida.
2013....

If you never went before 2006, you didn't see the Pirates that was intended for Florida.
2013....(But I am sure my criticism of MK Pirates was still applicable in 2006, unless they only shortened the ride after 2006 and removed the second drop...)
I do think part of the problem is that the Disneyland version that has had the constant upgrades and maintenance typical of DL, while the MK version has had the upgrades and maintenance typical of WDW.If you never went before 2006, you didn't see the Pirates that was intended for Florida.
I do think part of the problem is that the Disneyland version that has had the constant upgrades and maintenance typical of DL, while the MK version has had the upgrades and maintenance typical of WDW.
could be, but I'm thinking another plastic barren princess ride, on par with more like mermaid really. however frozen is a lot more barren than mermaid. while mermaid is more plastic.If indeed this is done by "late 2024", than I'm not expecting much.
Maybe they could start exterior work before the ride closes, like ToT in DCA, but I'm not sure if that's possible.
I'm thinking this whole thing will be closer to Snow White's Enchanted Wish than Frozen Ever After in scope, just on a larger scale.
It's funny how far Disney has fallen in the creativity department. It used to be you just trusted what they were doing. Now it's prove it to me.Could they still surprise us and it be incredible? Absolutely. but its really not sounding that way and at this stage I think we would have known by now.
To get pedantic for a moment, Jurassic Park is not a log flume, it is a Shoot the Chutes ride, as is Pirates, 4 across seating for 4-5 row boats + drop=Shoot the Chutes. They typically make bigger splashes and get you more wet. They also lack fast rapid sections that log flumes have as the only time they aren’t traveling in deep water are lifts and drops.They are going to change the ride but I'm not sure why there can't be two log flumes. Universal has Jurrassic Park and Dudly Do Right in islands of adventure. Would it be smarter to have it in another park? Sure but if they went up to Chapek and said we want a new log flume based on DuckTales and he said yes nothing is stopping you from putting it in Magic Kingdom.
I think this attraction is in an impossible situation. It’s replacing a beloved and well-regarded one, so it will always be compared against the original. It’s restricted to the existing ride itself - I can’t imagine it would be easy or even possible to reconfigure the course of the ride. The existing ride hasn’t even closed and it’s already got a rough opening window. And the IP it’s based on, while a worthy basis for an attraction, didn’t have the level of success of other properties that have recently been mined for attractions.Disney has barely released a shred of concept art and every single person on here is jumping to conclusions of what this attraction will be. I noticed someone said recently Disney can not afford to screw this up, point blank, they can't. They have announced as I mentioned earlier that a very popular attraction is racist and problematic, they can not turn around and cut corners and develop a half-a** replacement. It won't bode well, I hope that this redo is successful and will be worth doing
Mr Chapek says "Hold my beer"they can not turn around and cut corners and develop a half-a** replacement.
The old guard is goneIt's funny how far Disney has fallen in the creativity department. It used to be you just trusted what they were doing. Now it's prove it to me.
They'd be blissfully ignorant about the changes made to the Imagination pavilion too. So what?Pirates is still a great ride. First-time visitors unaware of the changes made to it are very unlikely to come away with the dire impression that seems to prevail in this forum.
Wasn't that because they needed a quick and dirty version because everyone was going "where's pirates?"Okay don’t mind me being off topic but… the biggest travesty for pirates is how they brought it to MK in the first place. A park with ample room, and they create an abbreviated version?
That was my biggest disappointment when I finally visited WDW, how much they bungled Pirates.
Journey Into Imagination is now a poor ride, as demonstrated by the fact that it's basically a walk-on. Pirates remains a headliner for a reason, notwithstanding the claims often made here that it's gone to pot.They'd be blissfully ignorant about the changes made to the Imagination pavilion too. So what?
Pirates is a significantly worse ride than it used to be.
Long story short, in another thread where the majority of the conversation is now deleted, some folks were upset/triggered/annoyed/shocked when I said that Los Angeles and Orlando are incomparable cities. Folks used that to call back to the notion that Californians think they’re better, and I got called an “elitist,” despite the fact that I said nothing bad about Orlando or any of the 49 other states. So, I changed my name to the thing folks in that thread saw me as and wanted me to be.
It’s personally funny to me, but I will probably change my name back at some point.![]()
THANK YOU.It's hilarious that anyone would think Orlando and Los Angeles are comparable. Orlando's comparable to places like Indianapolis and Cincinnati, not Los Angeles and New York.
And that's not intended as a slight to Orlando; it's just the truth.
Not really.Hard to believe we are 2 years out on a project and are left with just a name and 1 or 2 pages of concept art.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.