Splash Mountain re-theme announced

Status
Not open for further replies.

ImperfectPixie

Well-Known Member
There already is a backlash. Anytime Disney re-themes an attraction, a group of haters emerge and describe in detail the horrors of the changes. They are disciples of General Grizz. He was famous around these parts about 15 years ago for his involvement with Save Disney and his opposition to changes at The Land Pavilion at Epcot.

So we can look forward to a whole new round of hate when the new re-themed Splash Mountain opens. But don't worry, just shake it off!


That's pretty funny coming from you.
 

Donaldfan1934

Well-Known Member
I wonder what Mariah Carey and her ex, Nick Cannon think of this whole controversy...they are known for being die-hard Disney lovers, and if you google her, there are pictures of their family having a great time on SM...
Well, considering Nick Cannon starred in his own Brer Rabbit movie along with being photographed having fun with his family on the ride as you say, I think it’s safe to say he’s a fan.
 

Donaldfan1934

Well-Known Member
It's kinda odd that you haven't heard one peep from any of them...
I think some celebrities might be afraid to speak out against Disney’s decision, especially if they have professional ties to the company. One person I am surprised we haven’t heard from yet is Floyd Norman. He’s been a staunch defender of SotS in general, so I’d like to hear his take on all of this.
 

MerlinTheGoat

Well-Known Member
Where is the information on the budget? I didn't know Disney released that type of thing.
They didn't. Budgets are usually not officially announced for re-themes of old attractions. But they still end up being discovered by these fan communities anyways (like how the community knew Frozen at Epcot was $75 million).

The person who stated this PAFT project is $50 million was the person who broke the news of this attraction overhaul to begin with (he also stated Disney is looking at other attractions for possible changes). It was posted by WDW Pro, several weeks before Disney announced this officially.

The 30-35 million budget was something that Sue, myself, and a small handful of other members on this forum were told by a different source (not posted publicly).

Neither of the rumored budgets are going to do Splash Mtn any sort of justice. If either is accurate, it'll be a complete embarrassment and people should set their expectations as low as possible. I don't know any actual details about the overhaul, but it's pretty easy to infer what a budget that tiny would mean.

This is my own speculation based on the rumored budgets. It's likely most of the interior scenery and figures will be gutted and scrapped. Especially WDW, which takes place in less of a bayou setting and more the outer edge of a forest with farmland and rolling green hills. Almost none of the current animatronics have the correct proportions to be reskinned as PATF characters (except for a couple of the smaller frogs and perhaps Brer Bear's frame for Louis). And I wouldn't expect to see anywhere near the same level of new physical scenery or animatronics added back in again. It's likely to have lots of emptied out sparsely detailed rooms with videos projected on the blank walls. Both rumored budgets are massively smaller than Frozen's was. And Splash Mtn is a much longer ride, so the budget will be stretched even thinner.
 
Last edited:

Chi84

Premium Member
They didn't. Budgets are usually not officially announced for re-themes of old attractions. But they still end up being discovered by these fan communities anyways (like how the community knew Frozen at Epcot was $75 million).

The person who stated this PAFT project is $50 million was the person who broke the news of this attraction overhaul to begin with (he also stated Disney is looking at other attractions for possible changes). It was posted by WDW Pro, several weeks before Disney announced this officially.

The 30-35 million budget was something that Sue, myself, and a small handful of other members on this forum were told by a different source (not posted publicly).

Neither of the rumored budgets are going to do Splash Mtn any sort of justice. If either is accurate, it'll be a complete embarrassment and people should set their expectations as low as possible. I don't know any actual details about the overhaul, but it's pretty easy to infer what a budget that tiny would mean.

This is my own speculation based on the rumored budgets. It's likely most of the interior scenery and figures will be gutted and scrapped. Especially WDW, which takes place in less of a bayou setting and more the outer edge of a forest with farmland and rolling green hills. Almost none of the current animatronics have the correct proportions to be reskinned as PATF characters (except for a couple of the smaller frogs and perhaps Brer Bear's frame for Louis). And I wouldn't expect to see anywhere near the same level of new physical scenery or animatronics added back in again. It's likely to have lots of emptied out sparsely detailed rooms with videos projected on the blank walls. Both rumored budgets are massively smaller than Frozen's was. And Splash Mtn is a much longer ride, so the budget will be stretched even thinner.
So no one actually knows then. I'm concerned for all projects at Disney because of the huge financial hit they're taking now with the parks being closed. Where Disney is concerned, I'm not inclined to set my expectations as low as possible because Disney usually does things pretty well. I'm just going to reserve judgment on the re-themed Splash until it opens. That's just me, though - I know others prefer to make up their minds in advance, especially where it involves a change they don't like.
 
Last edited:

21stamps

Well-Known Member
So no one actually knows then. I'm concerned for all projects at Disney because of the huge financial hit they're taking now with the parks being closed. Where Disney is concerned, I'm not inclined to set my expectations as low as possible because Disney usually does things pretty well. I'm just going to reserve judgment on the re-themed Splash until it opens. That's just me, though - I know others prefer to make up their minds in advance, especially where it involves a change they don't like.

I agree with you. There’s no way that I can assume this project is going to be done with any less Disney flair than another.. I think it will end as a well themed attraction, even while I’m against the princess invasion.lol
 

Disney Analyst

Well-Known Member
So no one actually knows then. I'm concerned for all projects at Disney because of the huge financial hit they're taking now with the parks being closed. Where Disney is concerned, I'm not inclined to set my expectations as low as possible because Disney usually does things pretty well. I'm just going to reserve judgment on the re-themed Splash until it opens. That's just me, though - I know others prefer to make up their minds in advance, especially where it involves a change they don't like.

And that’s on being a reasonable individual.
 

Jedi Stitch

Well-Known Member
I do not agree with re-theming rides. I am neither saying Disney should be a museum. Pirates was a ride about pirates, and gentrifying it did it a great dis-service. I can still enjoy it, but I miss the original. Now, Disney is saying they have been planning to do this for awhile, but now it feels political than the "right" thing. I agree with other posters, that if they are going to re-theme it they better hit a home run, other wise it will be a sad statement to both Disney and Cancel Couture revolution.
The real question will it be enough? Will retheming this ride make everyone happy? Will the cigar store indian be removed because it offends. Will the hall of presidents and great moments with Lincoln be banned. Will Frontierland be offensive to native americans. Jungle Cruise for the depiction of africans? Should Tomorrowland look like the current future of having pride flags put up and BLM graffiti on it?

I remember when Disney meant it was the happiest place on earth and was the original safe space. Everyone from all walks of life came together to have fun. Everyone is offended by everything and other peoples opinions are being forced down my throat under the threat of "no peace if I don't get my entitled way". This is just my opinion, now let the cyber bullies' comment on how I am wrong.
 

Smiley/OCD

Well-Known Member
Perhaps they do not wish to be associated with supporting white privilege.
By not speaking out, aren't they kinda silently OK with it? I mean, here's a perfect opportunity to endorse the change and show support for the retheme, and yet, crickets...maybe, just maybe, they weighed the evidence and felt, hey, it's just an awesome attraction...there's bigger, more flagrant examples of WP in the world to object to and speak out about? I certainly don't know, I'm just posing the question...
 

orlandogal22

Well-Known Member
Interesting perspective I found from someone who signed the petition to save Splash Mountain -

Geno Young, Chicago, IL, United States 1 week ago
I am a black man and this ride needs to be preserved because it tastefully represents “Song Of The South” which was the first time that the Walt Disney Company employed African Americans, and which garnered acclaim and an Academy Award: a huge feat for 1946. 99% of people entering this ride in 2020 would know nothing of this film since it’s been banned for nearly 40 years. The “woke” p.c. mob is defelecting their own personal issues onto this iconic ride. To replace it with a “Princess And The Frog” ride is not only crass but a disservice to the black community since, like it or not, this film is a significant part of our cinematic history. Not to mention, the Princess film takes place in 1912, not a very good era to be black in America. How long before it’s deemed inappropriate too? Think about it Disney. Do not do this.
15·

Report
 

Phil12

Well-Known Member
By not speaking out, aren't they kinda silently OK with it? I mean, here's a perfect opportunity to endorse the change and show support for the retheme, and yet, crickets...maybe, just maybe, they weighed the evidence and felt, hey, it's just an awesome attraction...there's bigger, more flagrant examples of WP in the world to object to and speak out about? I certainly don't know, I'm just posing the question...
But they have spoken out. Bob Iger (Disney CEO) has said, “I’ve felt, for as long as I’ve been CEO, that Song of the South – even with a disclaimer – was just not appropriate in today’s world. Given the depictions in some of those films, to bring them out today without some form or another, without offending people. So we’ve decided not to do that.”

And since Splash Mountain is directly based upon Song of the South and uses the principal cartoon characters from the film and uses direct quotes from Uncle Remus, it is obvious that the attraction too is not appropriate in today's world as well.

Frankly, I don't think TWDC wants to admit they were unwitting dupes in endorsing white supremacy.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom