B&M and others have a fat and height friendly rows already in their coasters, they just need to enforce that.I foresee a new restriction on roller coasters becoming effective soon along with the height restriction.
For safety reasons all riders with a body mass index of over 28 cannot ride under any circumstances.
Do you think the ACLU will object to this?
B&M and others have a fat and height friendly rows already in their coasters, they just need to enforce that.
I think you meant the folks who fight for fat equality.
God forbid we address the reason why most of these folks are obese.
Having been a Boy Scout myself and one that went on quite a few high adventure outings, I can attest to the fact that most overweight kids just couldn't cut the physical exertion necessary on these outings.While somewhat off topic, I saw this yesterday and it seems fairly on-point: http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/19/health/boy-scouts-bmi/
At 6' 8", my husband is unable to fit on a number of rides - coasters especially - which suits him just fine.B&M and others have a fat and height friendly rows already in their coasters, they just need to enforce that.
I think you meant the folks who fight for fat equality.
God forbid we address the reason why most of these folks are obese.
Oh well, at least he went with an original excuse.Wandering in a different direction...
I watched Bag check at MK bust a frat boy (kappa alpha psi) for pot. He was swearing up & down that he's never seen that container before and someone must have out it in his bag.
Should have said "Want some?" And off he goes, free admission for the day and an invite to VISTA WAY!!!Wandering in a different direction...
I watched Bag check at MK bust a frat boy (kappa alpha psi) for pot. He was swearing up & down that he's never seen that container before and someone must have out it in his bag.
That sound about right. You get into some physics a long the way as well, once the mass has acceleration in a negative G you end up with more force heading out of the cart with a reduced cross section to hold you in. LOL. Sorry this is just getting ridiculous with the obese people.
A few occasional exceptions don't disprove the rule...
Having been a Boy Scout myself and one that went on quite a few high adventure outings, I can attest to the fact that most overweight kids just couldn't cut the physical exertion necessary on these outings.
Just to be clear (and I was also a Scout)--I feel exactly the same way. At the risk of receiving an unflattering label, I think the clamor for better "understanding" of the obese is grossly exaggerated. I don't doubt that there are a lot of people who have size issues that are outside their control, but looking back at the America of the 1980s or almost any other contemporary country around the world and contrasting them with contemporary America shows that we have a serious problem with preventable obesity.
Of course, it's easier to dub yourself as a victim of something outside of your control and demand accommodations and acceptance than to accept responsibility for something...
While somewhat off topic, I saw this yesterday and it seems fairly on-point: http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/19/health/boy-scouts-bmi/
I'll go further, taxes on soda and processed foods, the elimination of free refills for soft drinks, ending subsidies for corn, and banning processed foods from being advertised on children's shows to get started.Just to be clear (and I was also a Scout)--I feel exactly the same way. At the risk of receiving an unflattering label, I think the clamor for better "understanding" of the obese is grossly exaggerated. I don't doubt that there are a lot of people who have size issues that are outside their control, but looking back at the America of the 1980s or almost any other contemporary country around the world and contrasting them with contemporary America shows that we have a serious problem with preventable obesity.
Of course, it's easier to dub yourself as a victim of something outside of your control and demand accommodations and acceptance than to accept responsibility for something...
Can we please not lose sight of the fact that a woman is dead and her children are traumatized?
I almost broke my tablet screen I hit the like button so hard. I laughed so hard I think I may have pooed myself. And I thought I had simplified the analysis. Now off to change my shorts.......So.... In layman's terms.... The FUPA popped over the restraint & the rest soon followed?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.