Funmeister
Well-Known Member
Nothing says Disney like scantily clad women shakin' it!
Did you ever see "Mickey Mania" at the MK?
Nothing says Disney like scantily clad women shakin' it!
How about an ownership change?
It's not like there's an actual Disney still left in any significant management position, is there?
If you throw the warm and fuzzy feelings out the window, a buyout/takeover doesn't seem that bad.
Not sure about a table but they did open those new Tangled john's in the MK. Is a table more of a foreign thing? Not sure it would work in the Colonies. . . Unless is is kinda like PLINKO from the Price is Right? Take a dump, win a prize?Throw in a craps table and I'm in
Jay Rasulo has wanted a boutique park the moment he was made an executive.
Let's name the boutique concepts (that we know of.)
D-MGM Stdios - originally planned as an attraction at Epcot. Later changed as a three to four out attraction tour for resort guests called the "Studio Tour."
Disney's Boardwalk - Atlantic city amuse by park letter to be repurposed as a DVC resort.
Cape Canaveral "Discovery Cove"-type clone. Do not know much except it was to cater to DCL.
Night Kingdom - repurposed as Africa Jungle Trek at DAK.
Any others?
Let's name the boutique concepts (that we know of.)
D-MGM Stdios - originally planned as an attraction at Epcot. Later changed as a three to four hour attraction tour for resort guests called the "Studio Tour."
Disney's Boardwalk - Atlantic city amusement park later to be repurposed as a DVC resort.
Cape Canaveral "Discovery Cove"-type clone. Do not know much except it was to cater to DCL.
Night Kingdom - repurposed as Africa Jungle Trek at DAK.
Any others?
Let's name the boutique concepts (that we know of.)
D-MGM Stdios - originally planned as an attraction at Epcot. Later changed as a three to four hour attraction tour for resort guests called the "Studio Tour."
Disney's Boardwalk - Atlantic city amusement park later to be repurposed as a DVC resort.
Cape Canaveral "Discovery Cove"-type clone. Do not know much except it was to cater to DCL.
Night Kingdom - repurposed as Africa Jungle Trek at DAK.
Any others?
So, please don't say you're surprised by Jason Garcia's PR for WDW. He is a weak pathetic excuse for a beat reporter, but this is 2013, that is the Sentinel and he's probably thrilled that he can bring home $47k plus benefits, while so many in the field are unemployed.
Oh, and the idea that he doesn't troll this forum (and others) is laughable ...as was his 'piece'.
But rest assured TDO and CP are quite pleased with it ...and, really, that's what matters. Just a sorry excuse for a reporter.
Is Beastly Kingdom considered a evolution of Night Kingdom or was it always just intended (conceptually at least) as a "land" for DAK?
What about the "Disney Villains Park"? Or was that just the fever dreams of the fanboy community?
There's a lot of sounds coming from the hallways and offices and cubicles of TDO, chuckling wouldn't be one.
People need to look beyond the simple attendance figures (which are not accurate anyway, but PLEASE let's nor start that inane and never-ending debate). One business is growing by leaps and bounds, the other is treading water at best and hoping for giant leaps in revenue due to a flawed system they can't get up and running.
Golden goose? How about burnt goose?
wow jealous much?
Boy do I ever agree... Disney should just put a going out of business sign at all the parks and liquidate items now before it's too late and Uni and Harry rule the world! We'll celebrate by drinking a butterbeer lol
That added a lot to the discussion...
As for the companies that cater to the masses--if guests are truly limited to one "E-ticket" FP per day, their touring plans might become even more important. Ditto if FP drives up lines at C and D-tickets.
WDI: We don't hire talent, we fire it!Internationally, there was a concept called "Disney's Enchanted Forest" which looked pretty interesting with its Tree Castle (you can find artwork for it on John 's website).
And the Singapore indoor entertainment mall featured in 2006(?) Annual Report.
There's a difference between harmless rambling and flat out directly mocking and attacking someone as you just did.what discussion? This thread is all rambling anyways lol
Yes, someone is certainly not happy that the article didn't go their way.wow jealous much?
Right, but I guess what I was saying is that this type of product is based upon the current FP system. Any touring plan that claims to eliminate lines longer than X has to rely on current FP system. If people can't get E ticket FP's, or only 1, or unknown, it kind of renders their product obsolete. At best they are going to need a several-month cooling off period to figure out how they need to re-write all their material.
For example, right now it is very easy to create touring plan for which you can hit all the E tickets in Magic Kingdom over the course of a day, and easily make a claim that you will not have a wait of more than 15 minutes. But if you take away the readily-available FP option, there is no way anyone could continue to make that claim.
wow jealous much?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.