Padraig
Well-Known Member
So, Ricky and his wife will either do the right thing, and suffer the loss of perks, or ....
Face the horror of ending up as reviled as Ain't it Cool News' [pwesents] Harry Knowles [/pwesents]
So, Ricky and his wife will either do the right thing, and suffer the loss of perks, or ....
I'm still waiting for Universal to start offering discounts to DVC members... I really think it should happen.
If that's the case, cities, states, and the federal government need to stop investing in city schools.Ha, that's funny. Where he went to high school has nothing to do with money we've personally made.
Like I've said before, I'd love to know how most of them stack up against this site or simply threads like this one or Sotto's that get loads of eyeballs.
My strong belief is most of them added together don't have the reach that MAGIC does.
I swear I thought jt had moved on. Not sure how I feel about his continued presence/existence.
I see where you're going but wouldn't that be more incentive to purchase DVC?
well it all comes down to parents who value education whether they are poor or rich..if parents value their child's education you can get a great educationIf that's the case, cities, states, and the federal government need to stop investing in city schools.
But, then I take a look at college acceptance rates from affluent high schools vs. city schools and average salaries for the same groups and think you are incorrect. It's not discounting personal work ethic and drive, but to suggest where someone goes to high school has no effect on their wealth is absurd. I'm very happy that my parents could afford to raise me to go to an affluent high school, get into a good college b/c of the offerings my high school had, get into an even better grad school because of the undergrad school, and get a job that will allow me to take my family to WDW several times a year and stay at deluxes if we want. That would have all be FAR less likely had I grown up 10 minutes to the west of where I did.
From my perspective on the manufacturing and retail side, Marvel licensed toy products continue to underperform on the big box side and Monsters University was a grossly overproduced line on the consumer products side and they're struggling to unload product. I've seen discounting of the MU of up to 50% places and where there isn't discounting, the shelves are full with poorly performing product. I believe ThinkAway has the license here and that's going to be a real bummer when they have mass quantities of pallets of returned, unsold big box merchandise. ThinkAway produced a limited line of Despicable Me 2 products and the shelves are completely bare.
A side-note with regard to the issue of too much DISNEY product in the marketplace: I was speaking to the owner and management of a company that we used to do a good deal of business with and I was asking as to why they had let certain licenses lapse? Disney was a big license for this company for half of the past decade. The answer was simple, the licensing fees were absurd and the marketplace is flooded with too much Disney product. The same company that dropped Disney also manufactured Marvel products (licensing deal predating the Disney purchase) and now has brought DC Comics on-board. Their answer for that one was real simple, Marvel barely moved and they can't keep Batman, Superman, Wonder Women, etc. produced at a fast enough clip. The reality is that what this company produces, (Guess what?) DC doesn't have the marketplace flooded with junk and it makes the product desirable.
That doesn't even get into the PITA that Disney Consumer Products is for manufacturers, as I have a friend who owned a major toy company (sold in the past several years), and the hoops they had to go through to get DISNEY to approve any of the final product designs would make one rip their hair out. Multiple times the issues became so absurd that this guy's holiday products wouldn't get to retailers until after the holidays because of the arcane approval process.
Universal: Two parks. New attractions every year.
Disney: Four parks. Can't manage new attractions every year.
If Comcast is serious, this is how the tide turns. Younger demographic who doesn't feel nostalgia for WDW feels no loyalty to the Mouse's brand.
Other company starts offering better offerings at competitive prices.
Former industry leader piddles away money on vanity projects, management arrogance, and thinks it can maintain its industry dominance by controlling the message online.
Welp.
To anyone who thinks the Potter Train is going to loose steam, JK Rowling just announced that she's writing a spinoff movie series based around "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them"
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=108842
Just think, if Disney was willing to deal with Rowling, we could have had a Beastly Kingdom based on the adventures of Newt Scamander
No, what they really need to compete is the hotel rooms and state of the art attractions- and they getting both.
Beyond that comes a state of the art water park and who knows what they'll do with third gate plans, which they have.
Disney is going to lose tremendous gate at any park not called the MK in the years ahead if they stick to their current business models.
Meh. I will take Star Wars over any franchise out there. Plus Indiana Jones etc.
why do people think he does what he does for perks? My guess is he didn't get jack or ask for anything from Disney when he first got started doing this and he is/was just a fan of Disney wanting to share information with the fan community.
I just don't understand why there is so much hate for the Disney fan bloggers, podcasters, etc. just because they have more ability to share information publically and get a few perks here or there for sharing information to others?
Flooring. It seems inane, but it tells plenty about hotels and resorts. Go down the walkways of a corridor in a WDW Resort and feel the carpet and padding (or quality of stone, hardwood, etc), walk elsewhere at a high-end resort without the Disney prices, the flooring standard is nearly universally better at the higher end, lower priced property.
amazing what the comcast leaders envision for the future of their parks specifically UOR...leadership matters
I think\k the question is: Does he or they ignore the glaring deficiencies that abound in WDW (in order to keep the perks)?
If you have a blog that touts info for the un/under informed and that info is purposely left incomplete or skewed (in order to stay in the good graces of the company you provide info for) you are walking a very thin line (or just inside the thin line).
My concern is that Disney is much more interested now with the name recognition of properties than truly great attractions. From the Uni quotes, they absolutely get it. I don't think Disney does.
They will more than likely value-engineer CarsLand, Avatar and Star Wars (just like they did with the FLE). I believe they think the draw will be the property and not the attraction.
For the first time guests, they will be right, but then those guests will never step foot in WDW again because they didn't get their money's worth.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.