HMF
Well-Known Member
If you consider cynical and dethatched brilliant.Shrek 1 also took hits at Disney, and was brilliant!
If you consider cynical and dethatched brilliant.Shrek 1 also took hits at Disney, and was brilliant!
I do. Dry humor is the best humor. Far better than Stitch practically barfing his "chili dog" all over you in the ride across the street.If you consider cynical and dethatched brilliant.
I prefer observational humor that is constructive.I do. Dry humor is the best humor. Far better than Stitch practically barfing his "chili dog" all over you in the ride across the street.
There was plenty of that in the first movie. I won't comment about the second or third one...much less the fourth.I prefer observational humor that is constructive.
Gru > Roz
Dry humor is best. Dry humor.makes.you think, it takes effort and is simply not just given out for free.I do. Dry humor is the best humor. Far better than Stitch practically barfing his "chili dog" all over you in the ride across the street.
Apparently I do! And as soon as I figure out what removing dead grass from my lawn has to do with it, I will probably agree even more.If you consider cynical and dethatched brilliant.
Honestly, it would have been the same as the first movie, so that's why they made it radically different.Had they made a true sequel with Boo a little older doing stuff with the monsters I think would have been much better!
Dry humor is best. Dry humor.makes.you think, it takes effort and is simply not just given out for free.
I like my humor like I like my Martinis. Dry, and a little "dirty" is OK too.
If humor can be dry, then what is wet humor?I do. Dry humor is the best humor.
Where is Bambi lake?
The AKL was a special case. Disney pumped some serious money into that resort and thought cash customers would flock to it to experience the exotic African savannah. Instead, its location turned off a lot of potential guests and Disney found themselves scrambling to convert parts of Jambo House into DVC to dump excess inventory.
Even at popular Deluxe Resorts such as the Poly, occupancy is down. Let's face it, at over $600/night (with tax) for even a Standard View, even with a 30% "Room Only" discount, the Poly is now outrageously expensive for what it is. Heck, I can't believe it but the Poly even has some rooms, mind you, these are just rooms, that are over $1000/night with tax. Are they nuts?
No they are not. They recognize that, at those prices, the Polynesian is never going to fill up again. Better to convert excess inventory into DVC to recoup some cash. At a minimum, a DVC Poly will start at $150/point and probably will have over 3 million points to sell. Simple math suggests Disney has close to half-a-billion tied up in excess inventory. From a business perspective, heck yes they should convert those rooms to DVC.
Long term, could they build more Poly DVC rooms? Sure. However, what they really need (not what we need) is a large DVC in a popular location, something they could sell for a number of years. I think there's room between TTC and the Contemporary but the most commonly mentioned options are near Fort Wilderness or a stand-alone Epcot DVC, perhaps something with its own entrance into the World Showcase. This is just speculation though. I've been making inquires and have yet to hear anything concrete.
What apparently has changed in the attitude within the halls of Disney Vacation Development, Inc (DVD). 12 months ago, there was genuine concern that DVC was reaching its saturation point, hence the small DVC at the Grand Floridian. Now after 8 months of strong sales, they've convinced themselves to return to their old ways; sell lots of heavily financed DVCs at high prices to unsuspecting rubes who are relaxing on their WDW vacations.
It's really shocking to watch how many DVCs at SSR, AKV, and BLT are going through foreclosure. Even more are getting rid of their DVC memberships at a loss on the resale market after owning for only a few years. They just didn't take the time to think it through. People who bought DVC directly years ago or those who bought via resale more recently might have gotten a good deal but those buying directly from Disney today are not.
What's weird to me is that the price for resale points at my home resort (Boardwalk) and other resorts appear to have gone up pretty dramatically since the time of my resale purchase in the spring of 2011. We bought at $67 per point, and now it looks like Boardwalk is selling between $80 and $90. This, even with the restrictions on resold points that took effect shortly after we purchased. There must be pretty high demand across the board.
Is that why My Magic + doesn't work East of the Mississippi?
I'm less optimistic about this.
I borrowed this from the Poly DVC thread. Credit to @DVCrockett for posting it:
Based on this sketch it looks like the vast majority of the bungalows will be on the right side of the point, fronting the beach area directly in front of Tahiti. The beach area to the left of the point fronting Hawaii and the main pool area should still have unubstructed MK views. I think that is the most popular area to view MK fireworks. The beach by the Luau cove will also still have the same views. The ground floor views from Tahiti as well as the beach in front of it will take the biggest hit and maybe the ground floor rooms in Hawaii closest to the point.
I know a few people who have similar opinions. They won't spend that kind of money for an amusement park.It very well could be. Friends of ours were recently planning their first ever trip to WDW. They wanted to do 3 days in a deluxe resort. After seeing the price of the resort and 3 day park hoppers they opted to stay offsite and wound up only doing Disney one day and went to Sea World and had a lounge at the pool/shopping day for the other two.
My friend makes very good money and could easily afford the deluxe room and park tickets but he said the price was just insulting and he couldnt willingly pay it without feeling ripped off. He did say they had a wonderful time at MK and look forward to going back but you have to wonder how many other families with good money to spend are shocked at Disneys high resort prices and stay offsite then wind up shaving off a few days of Disney for other parks/activities.
It very well could be. Friends of ours were recently planning their first ever trip to WDW. They wanted to do 3 days in a deluxe resort. After seeing the price of the resort and 3 day park hoppers they opted to stay offsite and wound up only doing Disney one day and went to Sea World and had a lounge at the pool/shopping day for the other two.
My friend makes very good money and could easily afford the deluxe room and park tickets but he said the price was just insulting and he couldnt willingly pay it without feeling ripped off. He did say they had a wonderful time at MK and look forward to going back but you have to wonder how many other families with good money to spend are shocked at Disneys high resort prices and stay offsite then wind up shaving off a few days of Disney for other parks/activities.
The DVC resale market changed in February when Disney offered free theme park tickets with the purchase of BWV and AKV points. Obviously (at least to me ), Disney was sitting on excess BWV points and wanted to clear these out.What's weird to me is that the price for resale points at my home resort (Boardwalk) and other resorts appear to have gone up pretty dramatically since the time of my resale purchase in the spring of 2011. We bought at $67 per point, and now it looks like Boardwalk is selling between $80 and $90. This, even with the restrictions on resold points that took effect shortly after we purchased. There must be pretty high demand across the board.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.