Of course, this is all surveys and tracking and statistics, but still... "I’ve learned that total awareness numbers are in the 90s while definite interest is at 67 which is higher than even The Avengers,which went on to make the highest North American opening of all time with $207M."
Of course, this is all surveys and tracking and statistics, but still... "I’ve learned that total awareness numbers are in the 90s while definite interest is at 67 which is higher than even The Avengers,which went on to make the highest North American opening of all time with $207M."
All part of my plan to get Spider-Man in Avengers 2.
If you could post a pic of a monorail footer you found somewhere you would have more street cred and that would help.
I think you may have meant to quote another post.
I think "up your" has been copyrighted.
Well not in England it hasn't, where it constitutes just about every second sentence.
I find your use of a blue smilie demeaning towards people of white, black, yellow, red or brown colour. Why do you exclude these groups? Together, they form the majority of America. Not all of us are blue, you know.I think you may have meant to quote another post.
The movie rights for Spider-Man were traded basically in perpetuity in exchange for Disney to get the rights to the Spidey movie merch. But that might not be a bad thing. It means that Sony and Disney are on friendly terms regarding Spider-Man; Disney and Fox (Fantastic Four, X-Men) reportedly do not get along well. Whatever IM3 does, Avengers will get a lot of blame/credit. If Avengers turns IM3 into a mega-movie whereas the previous ones were just really really really big movies, Sony may offer Spidey up for Avengers 2. Amazing Spider-Man did not really improve (may have declined?) from its predecessors.
I too am one who would love to see Spider-Man in The Avengers 2 and this just made me think of something. Could Disney hit up Sony to pay for some of The Avengers 2, which is likely to cost a few pretty pennies? Disney takes less risk, Sony gets a shot at some of the money and Disney gets another character to merchandise with the film.
Clearly lazyboy is trying to perpetuate a pro-Avatar agenda.
Without even worrying about production costs, I think there are benefits for both sides. Disney gets another huge character for Avengers 2 merchandise and something to get the fans even more excited. Sony gets advertising for its next film and hopefully a healthy box office bump like Iron Man 3 hopefully will get. The fact that they worked together to come up with a deal like they did for the movie rights gives me hope that they'll be open-minded. I can't imagine Joss Whedon would be against it, creatively speaking.
I just knew it.
I just knew it.
I think we need to keep a close watch on him. We need to check his agenda-driven posts for any overusage of the Blue Men Group of smilies:
I'll go check his three friends LinkedIn account for any bl
I thought The Amazing Spider-Man did a lot more things right then it's predecessors. The most obvious would be Andrew Garfield playing Spider-Man. I hope they get him involved in Avengers 3 but they would have to explain why he wasn't in the battle at the end of The Avengers
I'm picturing a cameo in the big battle at the end... shouldn't take long to script or derail the plot at all.
It would have been ideal to have him in the first Avengers, especially since we don't know if they'll be blowing up Spidey's hometown again in Avengers 2, but I don't think that necessarily needs to be explained away. If they want to, they can do it Lion King 1½ style-- he was there fighting Chitauri in NYC, we just didn't see him. Yes, I just referenced Lion King 1½.
