Ismael Flores
Well-Known Member
Didn't he say that it would create lots of synergy?
If that is the case then it has to be a property they own and already might be in use or will be in use for television and or other divisions besides theme park.
Something like Star Trek or LOTR would not create much synergy outside of the theme parks that would benefit Disney unless they acquire more than theme park rights including percentage of merchandise, tv rights, film rights etc.
Carsland, toy story, Star Wars and Indiana jones and to a certain extant Marvel are all Properties that they control most aspects of. All those can create synergy thru tv, film, theme parks and merchandise.
The one big exception to the recent additions is Avatar but I think they figured they should get theme park rights in that before Universal took it. I'm also sure that will get a percentage of any merchandise sold but most likely have no other rights for synergy across the company since another studio owns the movie rights and probably television rights
If that is the case then it has to be a property they own and already might be in use or will be in use for television and or other divisions besides theme park.
Something like Star Trek or LOTR would not create much synergy outside of the theme parks that would benefit Disney unless they acquire more than theme park rights including percentage of merchandise, tv rights, film rights etc.
Carsland, toy story, Star Wars and Indiana jones and to a certain extant Marvel are all Properties that they control most aspects of. All those can create synergy thru tv, film, theme parks and merchandise.
The one big exception to the recent additions is Avatar but I think they figured they should get theme park rights in that before Universal took it. I'm also sure that will get a percentage of any merchandise sold but most likely have no other rights for synergy across the company since another studio owns the movie rights and probably television rights