imagineer boy
Well-Known Member
Well, either way, its a sure fact that Disney's making a great number of cuts at the theme parks which is a horrible thing and must be stopped.
Tomorrowland DL Subs.No ... because once Disney cuts something it usually stays that way forever.
The problem is that when you cut ... even when things get better ... at least in Disney's case, you don't often put back what got cut.
When's the last time you got turndown service at Disney resorts? What happened to the Disney chocolates you'd get with your check at full serve restaurants? Has Spoodles or California Grill began serving lunch again and I missed it? Does Epcot ever close after 9 (or 9:30) p.m. anymore? Anyone seen a Swan Boat, Keelboat or Explorer Canoe at the MK recently? Anyone have lunch at the Odyssey after a ride on Body Wars and a showing of Making of Me or Cranium Command?
No ... because once Disney cuts something it usually stays that way forever.
They've already cut the one thing that matters most to me. Nothing else shocks me anymore.
That's what I've been saying ever since they took away Alien Encounter...
But when information is passed off as the gospel, when in reality it is all a Disney Fan Boy fantasy, it needs to be brought to peoples attention.
Tomorrowland DL Subs.
We have hope.:wave:
First, thanks Jedimaster for a reasoned response to wdw74. It amazes me how he calls out people with the "fanboy" pejorative while at the same time his posts reek of fanboy-isms. But maybe I am the only one seeing that.
I have found a simple strategy that works for me during these creative droughts that occur from time to time at WDW (this is the fourth time in my estimation). I just don't go to the parks. I just wait until they earn my business back which can take years. Meanwhile there is plenty else out there to see and experience.
I highly recommended the rocky mountain states (no pun intended) and the United Kingdom.
Shuttering the Adventurer's club was kinda shortsighted - yes- though ultimately that, too, was about money (though not specifically related to the current economy) -- the Adventurer's Club didn't make as much as it should have. If/When that concept opens back up expect it to be engineered to make a lot more money.
These cuts are different though - if Disney does follow through with these & puts projects on hold, I will not be surprised. Their shareholders will expect it in the current economic climate--not putting everything on hold would be considered reckless. I am not sure really what the problem is here - yes, Disney has made a bunch of boneheaded moves at times but in this particular case EVERYTHING is going to suck everywhere for the next few years. Lots of people (even on this message thread) are going to unexpectedly lose their jobs. People aren't going to have a lot of disposable income to throw at dream vacations. Look at the aggressive offers you've seen recently (the very sweet hotel & merchandise offers that really have no precedent) and tell me that this isn't a direct response to the economy.
Disney has always been an escape from reality as much as possible, but in this case reality is intruding and I think that's probably what's getting people upset. I don't think there's much that can be done here - it doesn't mean they'll put these projects on hold indefinitely (if they do), it just means they will be delayed. Along with everything, everywhere else...
When at WDW next year look for attractions to become 'seasonal' ... you like things like CoP and the Swiss Family Treehouse and the Liberty Belle? I'd enjoy em in the next few weeks myself.
WDW1974 said:NOT COMING BACK!
You've never put anyone down for being a fanboy, but you attempt to dismiss someone who provides a rational response to you overly doom and gloom report of rumour as "A mere baby in the world"? You took most of what he pointed out and tried to say "See? you're saying the same things as I am!" when in fact he was putting significantly less negativity into his summation on what we can expect in the short term from Disney. I don't care what your sources are for whatever you post because by the time you've put it in your own words it no longer has value.Yes. His response was reasoned. I didn't even know until five minutes ago that the poster in question is all of 17 years old. A mere baby in the world.
And yet he had a very rational, articulate response ... one that I didn't find much fault with until his close (which made me think he may have a future ahead of him as a WDW PR hack!)
FWIW, I have never put anyone down for being a 'fanboy' ... what would the Disney universe be without 'em, right?
But if you think my posts come off as fanboy drivel then I'd suggest you develop more critical thinking skills.
You've never put anyone down for being a fanboy, but you attempt to dismiss someone who provides a rational response to you overly doom and gloom report of rumour as "A mere baby in the world"? You took most of what he pointed out and tried to say "See? you're saying the same things as I am!" when in fact he was putting significantly less negativity into his summation on what we can expect in the short term from Disney. I don't care what your sources are for whatever you post because by the time you've put it in your own words it no longer has value.
Your negative slant and your arrogant defence of it removes any credibility from anything you post.
It's really all about timeshares at this point, but one must really wonder what kind of market there is ... especially when Marriott and Hilton are offering higher quality products for less money.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.