• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Secret Invasion (Marvel Disney+ Series)

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Are you serious?

Coming from Hyperion Press in 2024:

The Illusion of Life 2.0: From Chouinard to ChatGPT


call it what it is DIRTY

Could you please use words that aren't loaded with metaphor/simile for what exactly is the issue.

If you were in a court of law suing someone, your case would be dismissed if all you said was, "your honor, what they did was gross."

What is the issue?

And don't refer me to a book (I think) that isn't published yet.
 

Disney Analyst

Well-Known Member
I really do not understand the "slow burn" commentary. This is a spy/espionage thriller, it should have moments that work and build towards something. That's the point.

And frankly, I didn't really find it slow, what does slow mean? Is it meant to be action 24/7? Is that the only thing that results in something not feeling slow?

This first episode had story, drama, tension, and intrigue. They setup the world, motivations and stakes. And it all built towards an epic and emotional finale.
 

Wendy Pleakley

Well-Known Member
I'm glad to see Nick Fury get some attention. He kind of disappeared. I thought he would have had a role in Endgame.

Marvel shows suffer a bit I suppose because the audience wants action adventure on a scale that a streaming budget isn't going to provide.

WandaVision spoiled us I think because it was the perfect use of streaming. It told a story in the MCU but one that was uniquely suited to episodic television as an homage to classic TV with a new variation every week.

Falcon and the Winter Soldier was effective too in that TV allowed them to do a show that explored social issues, freeing them up to focus on action in the movie follow-up. It still may have suffered a bit from the perception of being "too small" for a MCU show.
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
I really do not understand the "slow burn" commentary. This is a spy/espionage thriller, it should have moments that work and build towards something. That's the point.

And frankly, I didn't really find it slow, what does slow mean? Is it meant to be action 24/7? Is that the only thing that results in something not feeling slow?

This first episode had story, drama, tension, and intrigue. They setup the world, motivations and stakes. And it all built towards an epic and emotional finale.

This is a personally opinion, but I tend to find a lot of TV these days too slow because they've loss the tendency to do actual individual episodes and every is just part of a season long arc. I think the Marvel shows are would be more interesting with some sort of "monster of the week" type compact storylines while there being a season long thing in the background that is being built towards. The Mandalorian season 1 was excellent at this for example and I think it contributed to its popularity.

I suppose in this case though there was something like that with the dirty bombs and them going off (with surprisingly little casualties though it seems).
 

Disney Analyst

Well-Known Member
This is a personally opinion, but I tend to find a lot of TV these days too slow because they've loss the tendency to do actual individual episodes and every is just part of a season long arc. I think the Marvel shows are would be more interesting with some sort of "monster of the week" type compact storylines while there being a season long thing in the background that is being built towards. The Mandalorian season 1 was excellent at this for example and I think it contributed to its popularity.

I suppose in this case though there was something like that with the dirty bombs and them going off (with surprisingly little casualties though it seems).

Right, so very much a style thing. I don't love episodic stuff. I'm more of a grand overall story, spread out through episodes.

Breaking Bad, Game of Thrones, etc. That's my vibe.

I'm okay with some episodic stuff mixed in, but I really want it to be story driven, like a really long movie.
 

ParkPeeker

Well-Known Member
Could you please use words that aren't loaded with metaphor/simile for what exactly is the issue.

If you were in a court of law suing someone, your case would be dismissed if all you said was, "your honor, what they did was gross."

What is the issue?

And don't refer me to a book (I think) that isn't published yet.

You’re in the thread that below was posted in, stop pretending like you didn’t see this
What slippery slope? If you knew anyone who is a professional writer artist or creative, you’d know that it LLMs/GenAI has already been taking jobs everywhere, it’s already been happening for months. From individuals to entire departments. To an already undervalued field. Heck this ‘AI opening’ has replaced many artists. There is no ‘what if.’ This tech, which absolutely cannot exist without the unauthorized & uncompensated works of billions of artists/writers/etc, is 100% created for the purpose of replacing entire fields, make no mistake.

Regarding Marvel, they have already (notoriously) been underpaying vfx artists, they've shown they don’t care. This ai decision feels like a director/producer/committee seeing gen ai as the new big thing, and with 0 care, 0 informed thinking, deciding to just go with it, very very tone deaf, especially considering the current strike. The majority of professional writers and artists are against this thing. This tech isn’t a solution to anything, it’s a created problem for the workers it’s supposedly for, for the sake of ‘profits’ to big tech, to big corps, to the top.

Now if you really want to talk about ‘slippery slopes,’ even though I don’t think it is a slippery slope at all, if we keep going this way there are implications of this problem extending to white collar jobs.

That intro used illustrations, yet no illustrators were part of the process. Instead AI was used (which cannot work without the training data of millions of pieces of stolen art). Jobs were lost. All kinds of artists have already been replaced in the past year, but something like MCU, that’s huge and worrying. If they manage to convince the public this is all ethical/fine, it’s gunna be bad. (Worse than the bad it’s been already been for artists)
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Was Maria Hill really that known outside of hard core fans?
She was in about 8 movies…she was likable…played a strong small character…recognized…

Similar to the Sharon carter role.

Silly to off anyone that is decent right now…since the kids are not gonna be keen on “kang vs the leftovers”

But I’m never gonna convince you…just watch it play.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
She was in about 8 movies…she was likable…played a strong small character…recognized…

Similar to the Sharon carter role.

Silly to off anyone that is decent right now…since the kids are not gonna be keen on “kang vs the leftovers”

But I’m never gonna convince you…just watch it play.
She was a good side character not debating that, I'm just saying I don't think she was really known by the masses outside of the hard core fans.

You're usually the one arguing the point about the masses not knowing the lesser side characters, ie the fringes.

Oh how the tables have turned....
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
She was a good side character not debating that, I'm just saying I don't think she was really known by the masses outside of the hard core fans.

You're usually the one arguing the point about the masses not knowing the lesser side characters, ie the fringes.

Oh how the tables have turned....
She was on one of the biggest profile sitcoms for about 8 years leading in…

People like what they know…

Better?
 

Prince-1

Well-Known Member
I like the opening and have no problems with them using AI. Technology has always and will always change people's lives. Anybody still buy a physical newspaper anymore??? Lots of jobs lost in that field.
 
Last edited:

Disney Irish

Premium Member
She was on one of the biggest profile sitcoms for about 8 years leading in…

People like what they know…

Better?
She's recognizable I agree, again not arguing that point.

I'm just saying that she isn't likely to be one of the characters the general public remembers from the MCU. If you ask Joe 6 Pack who the girl from How I Met Your Mother played in the MCU they'll likely say "who?". Trust me I'm in the fringes of the MCU, and I'm a fan of Cobie, but even I have to admit she wasn't a high profile character that the general public would know off the top of their head.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
She's recognizable I agree, again not arguing that point.

I'm just saying that she isn't likely to be one of the characters the general public remembers from the MCU. If you ask Joe 6 Pack who the girl from How I Met Your Mother played in the MCU they'll likely say "who?". Trust me I'm in the fringes of the MCU, and I'm a fan of Cobie, but even I have to admit she wasn't a high profile character that the general public would know off the top of their head.
She’s a supporting character…no doubt

Just a likeable one. Offing her for a series that will likely lead to not much is similar to sucking Akbar out of a window…I fear?

She was a pretty significant character in age of ultron and particularly winter soldier…which is still the betting choice for best MCU movie
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
She’s a supporting character…no doubt

Just a likeable one. Offing her for a series that will likely lead to not much is similar to sucking Akbar out of a window…I fear?

She was a pretty significant character in age of ultron and particularly winter soldier…which is still the betting choice for best MCU movie
We'll see, but I don't think it'll have the impact with the general MCU audience that you think it will.

Also its comic stories they can always bring her back, they already have a precedence in the MCU of bringing characters back from the dead as needed, ie Coulson (even if not officially acknowledged).
 

Wendy Pleakley

Well-Known Member
I'm not a fan of killing off important characters. You never know when an opportunity will arise to use them again.

A classic example is killing of Captain Kirk because the powers that be possibly thought his continued existence would undermine their desire to focus on the newer casts.

Then the hugely successful reboot came along, the opportunity was there, and we were denied seeing Shatner and Nimoy on screen together again.

You can pass the torch without closing the door.

As the person behind the most recent season of Star Trek Picard said, it's hard to have a genuinely satisfying and heroic death scene for a major/beloved character.

They pulled it off with Iron Man. Does a comic book character death even count? With multiverses and time travel they could bring back Downey Jr. if all involved really wanted to.

Having said all that, it is a cliche that characters in shows and movies almost never die. Killing off a character on occasion can add a sense of believability and tension otherwise missing. Maria Hill is also not a significant enough character to be truly missed or whose absence will be felt in the greater MCU.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom