Let's build a Tiger King dark ride and call it a day.
Darkest dark ride ever!
Let's build a Tiger King dark ride and call it a day.
rumored black box
Let's build a Tiger King dark ride and call it a day.
It is so unfortunate they deem a revolutionary ride system too expensive for their flagship resort.There was a proposal for a JB ride using the Shanghai tech. But like I said it was deemed too expensive for Orlando.
True, although the ride would still cost a lot less now than it did for Shanghai.Costs not entirely paid for by Disney.
Besides Shanghai PotC, what ride tech is domestic Disney Parks missing?
Domestic Disney is getting Ratatouille and TRON. Domestic Disney is getting the LPS rides: MMRR, RotR, Rat, the rumored black box.
Domestic Disney will have the turn-on-command coaster of Guardians. Domestic Disney has the best flying audience system in FoP.
Domestic Disney has the best Toy Story Land, two SWLs, and Pandora.
Are you just blindly lashing out again?
That reference is so old that I was a teenager when that "argument" took place. Good times.Finally King Louie will actually have a ride
What gets me is that I'm sure that a good deal of these great attractions at other parks around the world are using the massive revenue that Disney gets from WDW to fund them. Smaller parks with lower attendance are getting the good stuff, while the parks generating all of that $$ suffers in that area. I don't have a ton of gripes about Disney, but that is my biggest one. Funnel most/all of the money that WDW makes back into WDW, and not overseas.Says the easily-impressed Iger shill.
Watch a video (in other words, educate yourself) of the Pirates ride in Shanghai. It demonstrates what a real state-of-the-art dark ride can really be. Why can't the U.S. have that? Then take a gander at Shanghai's Peter Pan's Flight update. And the Beauty and the Beast ride in Tokyo Disney. All those blow away the TRON rollercoaster, Rat and FoP combined. And Toy Story Land? The land of peeling paint and a kiddie coaster? You're actually impressed by that? Such blind loyalty. Or poor taste. But some of us have standards and reasonable expectations for the money we shell out for WDW. How you can defend cheapness and corner-cutting and call yourself a Disney parks fan is beyond me. Enjoy your disco Yeti and the Tangled bathrooms. The height of TDO innovation, no doubt, as far as you're concerned.
Disney pays less than half the cost for attractions in China (the three land expansion of Hong Kong Disneyland is a unique exception) and nothing in Japan.What gets me is that I'm sure that a good deal of these great attractions at other parks around the world are using the massive revenue that Disney gets from WDW to fund them. Smaller parks with lower attendance are getting the good stuff, while the parks generating all of that $$ suffers in that area. I don't have a ton of gripes about Disney, but that is my biggest one. Funnel most/all of the money that WDW makes back into WDW, and not overseas.
One plus point is that it aligns with a planned capex release for the park. Another plus point is the number is roughly the same. One the minus side I was told the ride system was deemed too expensive for Orlando (obviously things can and do change). And obviously another minus is the current situation regarding money.
There was a proposal for a JB ride using the Shanghai tech. But like I said it was deemed too expensive for Orlando.
Dang that really stinks. So we might get a Kali overlay with the Jungle Book instead? I wonder if Disney will us the Shanghai tech for a Indy boat ride at Hollywood Studios.
That was also a consideration but again budget prohibitive. Even more so now.
Besides Shanghai PotC, what ride tech is domestic Disney Parks missing?
Says the easily-impressed Iger shill.
Watch a video (in other words, educate yourself) of the Pirates ride in Shanghai. It demonstrates what a real state-of-the-art dark ride can really be. Why can't the U.S. have that? Then take a gander at Shanghai's Peter Pan's Flight update. And the Beauty and the Beast ride in Tokyo Disney. All those blow away the TRON rollercoaster, Rat and FoP combined. And Toy Story Land? The land of peeling paint and a kiddie coaster? You're actually impressed by that? Such blind loyalty. Or poor taste. But some of us have standards and reasonable expectations for the money we shell out for WDW. How you can defend cheapness and corner-cutting and call yourself a Disney parks fan is beyond me. Enjoy your disco Yeti and the Tangled bathrooms. The height of TDO innovation, no doubt, as far as you're concerned.
And Epcot.I remember @marni1971 hinting on this topic in past discussions and this seems to confirm some things. Basically, he had said that two different parks were fighting over getting a certain tech but for different rides - this basically confirms it was the Shanghai POTC ride system and that the two parks fighting over it were DAK for a Jungle Book ride and DHS for an Indiana Jones one. Makes sense..
My bet is on King Louie Walken, since he never turns down a paying job, whereas the estate of Louis Prima has been far more protective of his legacy.They better include the earthquake section.
EDIT - Begs the question though....is this King Louie Prima or King Louie Walken?
My bet is on King Louie Walken, since he never turns down a paying job, whereas the estate of Louis Prima has been far more protective of his legacy.
And Epcot.
That’s where the India ride originated from.What was Epcot's plan?
That’s where the India ride originated from.
I don’t know about the others but I heard of Epcot 4 years ago.Was it originally to be slated for Epcot first prior to the other parks wanting a piece of the action or were they all fighting for the Shanghai tech around the same time?
My comment was actually only limited to who would portray King Louis, archived Louis Prima recordings or paying Christopher Walken to record some new lines.I would hope not for a few reasons: DAK has the costume characters already. (could be used to hypothetically sell an addon Meet and Greet area) The animated feature is more MK-adjacent (more kid-oriented, something DAK I believe is wanting to add to their park) Theory: It'd be used to stave off any would-be Zootopia plans. The classic provides a better aesthetic. The music is better. 100% Fact. In comparing Prima to Walken... one of those guys can actually sing. One is bouncy and fun the other more action adventure. Both could work though. I just think the style of the original is better suited for theme park attractions.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.