Rumor concerning Phil Holmes

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
New ceiling tiles or something? My roof sure doesn't get that much attention.

Edit: Still wondering who the new guy might be if Phil goes, any source on that?
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
But you used Merf as a source that Phil is gone :veryconfu

Uhm ... no, JT.

I mentioned that he posted on LP.com that Phil was indeed gone.

I still have no idea whether he is or isn't. I don't name my sources and they are people I know.

To me, Merf and you are interchangable ... strangers on an Internet Disney fan site.

Only you like to jump out of moving attractions ... does Merfy?
 

jt04

Well-Known Member
Uhm ... no, JT.

I mentioned that he posted on LP.com that Phil was indeed gone.

I still have no idea whether he is or isn't. I don't name my sources and they are people I know.

To me, Merf and you are interchangable ... strangers on an Internet Disney fan site.

Only you like to jump out of moving attractions ... does Merfy?

I used to jump out of moving attractions.

Now merf, on the other hand, was more famous for scaling walls and materializing on the other side of locked doors. All with his trusty camera by his side.
 

docandsix

Active Member
Just got back from Disneyland...

Observations tangentially pertinent to this thread:

-It's a beautiful little park; Main Street is probably a little nicer and somehow less obnoxiously commercial than in Orlando.

-Overall, I would not concede that Disneyland is better maintained than the Magic Kingdom, though it seem to feature fewer empty/seasonal buildings, which are a constant irritant for me in the Florida parks.

-The improvements planned and already being implemented for DCA give me hope for the Disney brand in general, and the imagineers especially; and yes, I know the two coasts have different management teams, priorities, and philosophies, etc.

-There is already way too much Jack Skellington at Disneyland; I think I would vomit if subjected to a whole ride (or overlay) in his honor.

-I personally went over 20 years between visits to Disneyland's Haunted Mansion, as it was closed for re-furbishment or overlay tear-down the last two times I visited before last week. I survived, recognized the necessity of it, and didn't complain once. I think WDW's management overestimates the annoyance they'd experience from guests for closing attractions from time to time. And I happen also to agree with WDW1974's opinion that management's seeming refusal to close attractions simply feeds the average guest's expectations and demands that all attractions are open always for every visit.

-On the other hand, notwithstanding WDW1974's aversion to the Dining Plan and its evident impact on the quality of food in Orlando, the food that my family and I ate in Anaheim last week without exception paled in comparison to the cuisine we enjoyed (both counter service and sit-down) at WDW during our last several visits, all on the plan.
 

imagineer boy

Well-Known Member
LOL totally off topic, but I just have to say merf loves himself. He was the most "reported to moderator" poster on WDWMAGIC of all time, and frequently totally incorrect with his information.

Ah, good ol merf. :lol: Joined now among the ranks of the most legendary banned members.

BTW steve, is Thrawn number 2 on the most reported to moderator list? Just curious. :lol:
 

hrcollectibles

Active Member
Simple, they count the months HMH is open.
Theory being, guests making a first, or "once in a lifetime" visit to MK only want the standard HM, not Jack and co.
It's four months that original HM is not running.


But don't guests also make once in a lifetime trips to Disneyland? I for one would have no problem if they did this overlay. How was attendance impacted when the Haunted Mansion at the Magic Kingdom was down for the refurbishment? I do agree that having the Yeti in "B" mode is bad show. I think the reason they (Walt Disney Company Team Orlando) do not want to have Expedition Everest down is because it is one of, if not the main draw for that park.
 

MissK

New Member
The resort is still a wonderful place to visit. Many of the lower- and mid-level managers (some of which are getting laid off right now) work hard to maintain what the can...

...but the executives running the place are still relying on their predecessors' work, and when you ride someone's coattails long enough, you eventually fall off.
Oh I have no doubts the resort is still a wonderful place to visit, I'm planning on spending 9 days there in 2011. My thinking however is that the general WDW public who don't post on these boards really don't think the executives aren't doing a good job. MK is still the most visited amusement park in the world right? I'm not saying refubrishments aren't necessary (in fact I'm sorta surprised more stuff isn't shut down annually for x amount of months for upkeep) but I think the general WDW going person couldn't tell you that the Yeti was in B mode, hence why certain execs still do the "status quo."

Then again as I've said I haven't been to WDW in 20 years. ANY trip I go on there will be better then my first and only trip so far. I've been to Disneyland (and am going back this year for my 30th birthday) and next year I plan on going to Tokyo Disneyland & Disney sea. That of course is going to suck cause honestly I don't think WDW can outdo the super awesome that Japan has in 2 years, in this crap economy. They're more then welcome to try though!! :lol::sohappy:
 

hrcollectibles

Active Member
Why didn't they drop in nemo then? Attractions gather more people then picture spots (esp since the nemo ride had over a 2 and a half hour WAIT! They had to create a line past the matterhorn bobsleds). Cali isnt the only place with a nemo fan base, so it would def work..

That's because by the time they were adding Nemo to Disney attractions, 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea ride at the Magic Kingdom was under Pooh's Playful spot.
 

ClemsonTigger

Naturally Grumpy
Depends on who you ask. I'm not saying anything until I feel confident.

But that merf dude that everyone here seems to love said Phil's gone as well on anotherdisneyplace ... since I don't know him, I take it as just another voice.


People are having a discussion and you don't like the subject, so instead of doing the Big Boy thing and staying out of it, you believe the answer is shutting everyone else up. So open of you.

Just like nails on blackboard is just another sound....:rolleyes:
Even the Inquirer would hesitate to use him as a source.
 

SirGoofy

Member
Oh I have no doubts the resort is still a wonderful place to visit, I'm planning on spending 9 days there in 2011. My thinking however is that the general WDW public who don't post on these boards really don't think the executives aren't doing a good job. MK is still the most visited amusement park in the world right? I'm not saying refubrishments aren't necessary (in fact I'm sorta surprised more stuff isn't shut down annually for x amount of months for upkeep) but I think the general WDW going person couldn't tell you that the Yeti was in B mode, hence why certain execs still do the "status quo."

Unfortunately a good number of people do notice these problems.
 

CBOMB

Active Member
Yes, it's hideous idea to bring something new and exciting to a park that has been virtually unchanged for 15 years.:rolleyes:
Would you please stop. I have been trying to suspend any logical thought process while reading this thread.
That's a good point. The corporate culture needs to be reworked from the top down. Look how long Jim MacPhee (who supposedly genuinely strove for quality at EPCOT) lasted compared to Phil (who's reportedly somewhat less than a champion for quality).
It does make one wonder about the short length of Mr. MacPhee's tenure as VP of Epcot. As I understand it, he was very popular with the CM's also.
 

CBOMB

Active Member
I didn't realize that Merf was so "well loved" before he got booted. :zipit:

(Please see my last post on the infamous merf expulsion thread.)

Also I've never heard of anotherdisneyplace.com. I hope he enjoys his new found place on the interwebz!!1111one :rolleyes:
Merf gets mentioned so often here that he could possibly be someone famous or infamous, depending on who was making the comment. He post very little on LP. His post last night was the first I remember from him in a very long time. I believe there were two other banned members from here posting in the same thread.
:rolleyes:

Seriously? You can't even compare Merf's insane ramblings to '74.
I'm not going to touch that. I'm still trying to get that Bloody Mary out of
'74.
 

GymLeaderPhil

Well-Known Member
I used to jump out of moving attractions.

Now merf, on the other hand, was more famous for scaling walls and materializing on the other side of locked doors. All with his trusty camera by his side.
Wait.

Call me crazy, but is there a difference? :lookaroun
 

tirian

Well-Known Member
Oh I have no doubts the resort is still a wonderful place to visit, I'm planning on spending 9 days there in 2011. My thinking however is that the general WDW public who don't post on these boards really don't think the executives aren't doing a good job. MK is still the most visited amusement park in the world right? I'm not saying refubrishments aren't necessary (in fact I'm sorta surprised more stuff isn't shut down annually for x amount of months for upkeep) but I think the general WDW going person couldn't tell you that the Yeti was in B mode, hence why certain execs still do the "status quo."

Then again as I've said I haven't been to WDW in 20 years. ANY trip I go on there will be better then my first and only trip so far. I've been to Disneyland (and am going back this year for my 30th birthday) and next year I plan on going to Tokyo Disneyland & Disney sea. That of course is going to suck cause honestly I don't think WDW can outdo the super awesome that Japan has in 2 years, in this crap economy. They're more then welcome to try though!! :lol::sohappy:

WDW is riding the coattails of its marvelous past. It's still a great place, but the current WDP&R execs have no vi$ion other than $$$. More than any other theme park, Disney parks have to be run by people who care about the product and heritage itself, not just money; otherwise the parks are called Six Flags. It's a business, but Disney created this problem for itself with its legendary commitment to quality.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom