Supposedly this is a test to see how they can bring interactive elements to the queue at Rock n' Roller Coaster like Soarin' and Space Mountain have. Obviously, this set up is quite different from just placing games IN the line. This is entire new what of lining up.
I'm not fond of the whole games in line concept. Particulalry group games like at Soarin'. But the games would have to be engaging without being addictive. Plus there just won't be enough games to go around.
This new system is interesting. The wait time displayed when I was there was 30 mins at the entrance gates. The screens showed 15mins or less, 30mins or less, and 45mins or less. Again, when the test was over yesterday, the wait jumped up to 50 mins. I'm not sure if it was just due to people unsure about riding during the test or what. It seems to me that not only was the line a bit shorter, but the wait time seemed more accurate than the red tag system they use to update the wait time.
If the test ended at 2:30pm, it's possible that the park's attendance was higher by then. Epcot had morning EMH that day, and I know I didn't work my way over to that area until 2:40pm. What annoyed me was that the Single-rider line took longer than the standby line. I know it was just a freak coincidence that most of the riders were doubled-up, but still. I think the attendants should have to load single riders if they've been there an equivalent amount of time as the standby riders.
Each card given to the guest can also act like one of the red tag cards given to update wait times. Then like I said before, you also have the pros of also being able to grab an ice cream and sit and listen to a live DJ while your kids play Rock Band vs. standing in line on your feet staring only what is around you as you move a few feet every few mins. Sure it is confusing, but some people are still confused on how Fast Pass works.
The problem I have with this concept is that there really is no way to ensure people will be happier not standing in line. As was mentioned by someone else (and alluded to by me in my previous post), the ones who aren't moved by the entertainment options (which obviously will be limited) will end up just sitting there waiting. In an actual line, guests feel like they are doing something, whereas just sitting there they are doing nothing. You can easily listen to music while standing in line, so a DJ is hardly a good alternative. I know that this was merely a test, but they really would need to design something like this as part of the main attraction...lest you lose part of the show aspect of the attraction.
But with all this said and done, I should note that this was all based on observation after only a small period of the test when I was there. I didn't actually go through the test, just watched for about an hour until it was over.
I personally think the concept is great, but I just don't know how it could be executed without spending money that's best spent on refurbing attractions that badly need it or pumping into new attractions.
Um... not at all. The cards are distributed in order so at the start of the day, the first people to wait in Standby will get A1 cards, then the next group will get A2, and so on. It's not a random distribution, it's still first come first serve.
That seems like an inefficient use of manpower. Not having witnessed this, I assume they call A1...how long do the give A1 to show up before calling A2?