mattpeto
Member
Monorail to DHS was yes.
Thanks. I meant the 2nd phase of the skyliner.
But that's really cool they had monorail planned to DHS.
Monorail to DHS was yes.
From what I know so far there’s no second phase. But I’m sure there’s an exec somewhere gushing about how good it is.Thanks. I meant the 2nd phase of the skyliner.
But that's really cool they had monorail planned to DHS.
Thanks. I meant the 2nd phase of the skyliner.
But that's really cool they had monorail planned to DHS.
From what I know so far there’s no second phase. But I’m sure there’s an exec somewhere gushing about how good it is.
A rendering of yours.Top of my head there were monorail stations proposed for the Yacht/Beach, Swolphin/Boardwalk and CBR.
There was a proposal for a resort (DVC if I recall) near the MK auto plaza on the Epcot line. This is the only suitable place land management / swamp wise.And the Epcot monorail line has buildable space along it. Why not a “fill in” station with a resort along the way?
In general, I think the biggest failing with the master planning if WDW is not having more resorts and “stuff” walking distance. This would help to alleviate some of the transportation needs and congestion.
In particular, for example, why isn’t AKL next to the entrance of DAK and walkable? I’m sure there’s argument about the animal areas at both, but that could have certainly been overcome. And it would have enhanced the dining options at DAK which were quite limited for years.
Same things could be said for maybe putting (say) the water parks next to resorts.
And the Epcot monorail line has buildable space along it. Why not a “fill in” station with a resort along the way?
I wonder if there were environmental/regulatory reasons for not building more things close together.
That and a lot of the land Disney owns is unbuildable, or so swampy that while you could technically make it work the costs can’t be justified when you could just build nearby. Disney has put in footers only to watch them sink more than once.I wonder if there were environmental/regulatory reasons for not building more things close together.
That and a lot of the land Disney owns is unbuildable, or so swampy that while you could technically make it work the costs can’t be justified when you could just build nearby. Disney has put in footers only to watch them sink more than once.
Do I have a higher chance of Mickey taking all my money or falling in a sinkhole?I'm a Geologist in the Orlando area if people have questions about the environmental impacts on property. I can assuage (or intensify) fears about sink holes!
I'm a Geologist in the Orlando area if people have questions about the environmental impacts on property. I can assuage (or intensify) fears about sink holes!
Am I correct that sinkholes that eat roads and buildings are typically more related to unanticipated changes in water flow vs building on soft land?I'm a Geologist in the Orlando area if people have questions about the environmental impacts on property. I can assuage (or intensify) fears about sink holes!
Soon!Hey I am new to this side of the forums so, sorry if this has been asked recently, but any updated timetable for when Ratatouille might open?
Do I have a higher chance of Mickey taking all my money or falling in a sinkhole?
Maybe I’m in the minority here but, I prefer the sky liner to the old decrepit slow moving monofails that Disney wants no part of anymore. Have I given in?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.