@tigerlight , who hurt you? Your pain runs deep.
He is a former Cast Member and Annual Passholder. We just don’t understand the sort of privileged information afforded to one in such a unique position.@tigerlight , who hurt you? Your pain runs deep.
God I knew it. How could we be so stupidHe is a former Cast Member and Annual Passholder. We just don’t understand the sort of privileged information afforded to one in such a unique position.
I have an AP, and let me tell you, the information in the Mickey Monitor is priceless and should be guarded as if it were an Infinity Stone. Couple that with the wisdom of former CM knowledge and you have unbridled power!!!!He is a former Cast Member and Annual Passholder. We just don’t understand the sort of privileged information afforded to one in such a unique position.
Are your really so gullible as to believe that? If one of the "insiders" told you the sky is purple and the world is flat would you believe that, too?
Company publicly stated Everest was $100M. It is three separate structures built from ground up, 20 stories high, on several acres of land. It is enormous amounts of themed buildings, rocks, and everything else.
You really think a paint job, extremely minor effects, moving a ride, etc., cost $100M?
However, letting rumors fly that they spent that much was good for drumming up interest.... I mean heck who doesn't want to see the results of a $100M renovation? And yes, I know people thought it was crappy, but Disney execs/marketers think everything they do is exceptional... there's almost never a worry about people not loving it.
So when someone challenges you, you ridicule and personally attack them? Why not just cite some actual evidence?
I’ll take that as a compliment, thanks.
This all started because someone said a cloned ride in an unthemed warehouse, 20 year old ride system, remanufactured sets and screens, and some very limited highly themed areas is going to cost more than Everest..... and people actually believe that nonsense.
When I call BS the “south sayers” get insecure and start lobbing ridicule and insults. Is this how we should behave?
You’ve been shown evidence in the past and denied its validity. No point in bothering.So when someone challenges you, you ridicule and personally attack them? Why not just cite some actual evidence?
Are you not a former CM? Do you not currently have an active Annual Pass? If these are true, then how is it an attack?So when someone challenges you, you ridicule and personally attack them? Why not just cite some actual evidence?
I think it's really about whether you see "magic" in the ride system. Some do, some don't.
Not trying to bring this discussion up again, but Rat definitely is not an E-ticket attraction. If Rat is an E, what on earth is FOP and ROR?!
For Disney Imagineers, the "ticket tiers" are based on cost to develop and implement and the complexity of the ride and queue and overall theming.
For Disney guests, the "ticket tiers" are based on how fun and popular it is.
For Disney Corporation, the old use of "ticket tiers" was a combination of both: rides that cost more to make and run were higher priced to ride, and thus, a higher ticket tier, but, at the same time, they used the ticket tiers partly as crowd control as the lowered the tier of less popular rides (in order to entice more people to ride them) and raised the tiers of rides with really long lines (in order to drive crowds away).
See here for a discussion of tiers... https://forums.wdwmagic.com/threads/a-e-ticket-attractions.895286/#post-8204650
It was not “bleeding edge” technology. The LPS system debuted in 2000 with Pooh’s Hunny Hunt, 14 years before Ratatouille opened. Even the issue of synchronizing 3D projections with moving vehicles was tackled by the Amazing Adventures of Spider-Man in 1999.To the imagineers, it is. It was bleeding edge tech when it made to use LPS vehicles. To wit...
According to whom?According to who?
I think it's about whether you see the edges of the screen and the dirty floor. Both issues could have been solved, the fact they weren't knocks it down to a D for me.I think it's really about whether you see "magic" in the ride system. Some do, some don't.
No insider info, but still have a fairly deep knowledge of Disney ride costs? Ok.I don't claim to have insider info, but based upon my fairly deep knowledge of what Disney rides typically cost, I'm guess-estimating this one is in the $50M range... Now, $50,000,000 is still a staggering sum, but less than half of what Everest cost to build back in 2005...
Source?Another fun fact: Disney execs LOVE it when people exaggerate the budgets.
Source?A guess: Some of the "insiders" on here are purposefully fed "confidential" false information in order to spread it around and create buzz.
Source? None? Have you seen the construction documents for each build? Is there no site work to be done at WDW? Are they building a courtyard? Does Central Florida have the same water table as Marne La Valle?Virtually none of those costs are going into this clone of the ride.... and construction costs in Florida are much much lower than suburban Paris.
The biggest insider here is far from anonymous.Just take some anonymous person's word for it because they are "reliable" and "eloquent."
Source?but Disney execs/marketers think everything they do is exceptional... there's almost never a worry about people not loving it.
I would compare Rat to TSM, a D. I think Rat is more ambitious. Just me though.Do people consider Mermaid a D?
Rat>Mermaid
It’s costing far more than Everest to build.According to who?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.