peter11435
Well-Known Member
Again.. your posting history....But it’s not because...
(Haven’t we talked about how badly these one liners go?)
Again.. your posting history....But it’s not because...
(Haven’t we talked about how badly these one liners go?)
I agree...and I see no angle that would represent an “improvement”I think the end game is that staying on-site will guarantee you entrance to the parks where as the great unwashed masses ( myself included) who stay off site will be severely restricted when the parks are at whatever capacity Disney determines for the day. With analytics Disney could even start saying something like - "On Date XX we anticipate having to limit admittance to park number N to only 14 off site visitors"
This would provide more incentive to stay on site and also provide a number of up-sell opportunities.
Again.. your posting history.
His opinion is based on facts that people here are denying. You can disagree with all of his opinions, but that doesn't change the truthfulness of his facts.Thankfully I’m neither of those things.
I think you’re pushing your opinion REALLY hard and it comes off as a disgruntled former Cast Member...
His opinion is based on facts that people here are denying. You can disagree with all of his opinions, but that doesn't change the truthfulness of his facts.
Not everything he posts is fact. This thread alone has many examples of him posting his opinions as if they are fact.His opinion is based on facts that people here are denying. You can disagree with all of his opinions, but that doesn't change the truthfulness of his facts.
"Joe Rohde blows budgets to hell" is a fact.Not everything he posts is fact. This thread alone has many examples of him posting his opinions as if they are fact.
"Joe Rohde blows budgets to hell" is a fact.
"Joe Rohde blowing budgets to hell is bad for Walt Disney Parks & Resorts" is an opinion.
They really do not look even remotely similar to the hotel design...one angled porte cochere does not make this pedestrian contemporary hotel look anything like Frank Lloyd Wright architecture...Same here. It is not like anything he has done looks remotely similar to this design.
It's one piece of poorly-rendered low-resolution computer-generated concept art.They really do not look even remotely similar to the hotel design...one angled porte cochere does not make this pedestrian contemporary hotel look anything like Frank Lloyd Wright architecture...
That’s how you’re reading it...If my opinions come off as fact based on how it’s being read...I’m not gonna be able to mitigate that without “IMHO” on everything. Nope...let’s graduate to middle school.
It sure is if you misquote or extrapolate to make it look that way.
I said that they built it there to share services...I did not go on a tirade to standalone.
And who the hell typed “Disney’s riveria resort”??
The guy that still uses MGM and Dixie???
Never...once...will that happen...let alone on this thread. Check it.
Now that...is an apologist mistake...not well played.
You said that guests would have to visit OPR to get their Mickey waffles. You were pretty clearly saying the resort would not have a quick service venue.
Disney redid the food at CBR because they had to make room for the relocated custom house services and because the facility was in dire need.I said I think it will playout that way and I believe that is the intent all
Along. Disney didn’t redo all the food randomly at Caribbean to serve 384 FEWER rooms...they don’t don’t do that.
It was to allow use from the DVC AND to charge more for the Caribbean rooms. That’s an opinion that just happens to make 100% sense. *disclaimer*
In truth...we don’t know exactly what they’re putting in the DVC, do we??
I’ll read the official release if the food details have been released. I like to learn
But... Riviera will still have its own dining venues. Some of us do know what will be included.
I'll wait for Riviera to be completed, at least on the exterior, but as of late, their concept art work and their finished products have been rather close in appearance, so I have trouble assuming that the finished product shown in this project's art work will look much different than what we see now. Though the recent completed project that we have to refer to are mostly restaurant work like that at the Yacht Club or the Flying Fish or Sebastian's. Again, Riviera will be rather telling.It's one piece of poorly-rendered low-resolution computer-generated concept art.
It is a Lumion rendering in all likelihood generated from the project’s Revit model, in other words it’s blueprints.It's one piece of poorly-rendered low-resolution computer-generated concept art.
That's sort of my point. Those tools are trash at conveying texture. They probably had three different options for "stone," and none of them were particularly great.It is a Lumion rendering in all likelihood generated from the project’s Revit model, in other words it’s blueprints.
Lumion has lots of options that are highly customizable.That's sort of my point. Those tools are trash at conveying texture. They probably had three different options for "stone," and none of them were particularly great.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.