freedogshampoo
Member
"The company, while I was gone, decided to take a position against the Don't Say Gay bill that was moving through the Florida Legislature. I won't comment about what I would have done or not done, but the company took that position against it."
Wait, wasn't it widely reported that Bob Chapek wanted to remain silent/neutral
on the issue of the "Don't Say Gay" bill but it was Iger that pressed Chapek to make public comments? Particularly, Iger wanted Chapek to reassure employees of the companies values around diversity.
I personally am all for DEI am proud that the company took the stand that it did but Iger is trying to shift the blame & wash his hands of the role he played. This character trait of late has not been in a good look on him.