Figgy1
Well-Known Member
TrueDoubt it. Assistant State Attorney looks good on a resume.
Yep
The taxpayers of Florida.
Sad
Sadder
TrueDoubt it. Assistant State Attorney looks good on a resume.
Yep
The taxpayers of Florida.
RCID/CFTODWhen the state loses who has to cover the legal bills of the new board
Yes but there's probably going to be an injunction so I don't see how they can raise taxes when they have no power and how can RC be held accountable for the bills if the district is restoredRCID/CFTOD
That's the primary reason they are planning on raising taxes. They can't run a deficit so they have to come up with the attorney's fees somewhere.
I mean Disney is also suing for their legal fees, wouldn’t the state pay? Not the District?Yes but there's probably going to be an injunction so I don't see how they can raise taxes when they have no power and how can RC be held accountable for the bills if the district is restored
Ah yes, the sneaky tactic of having publicly noticed, open to anyone meetings before the new bill had even been introduced.I think Disney opened a bigger Pandora's Box by being sneaky to keep control of RCID. They acted like they were going accept it and than tried to keep it last minute with clever wording. I may be wrong but I don't think much would have changed if they had lost control of RCID. Now Disney has made DeSantis even more determined to crush The Mouse. It will probably cost Disney millions in lost revenue due boycotting company wide.
It’s rare that Disney can so completely complain to be “the victim”. That’s tough for any large corporationI think Disney opened a bigger Pandora's Box by being sneaky to keep control of RCID. They acted like they were going accept it and than tried to keep it last minute with clever wording. I may be wrong but I don't think much would have changed if they had lost control of RCID. Now Disney has made DeSantis even more determined to crush The Mouse. It will probably cost Disney millions in lost revenue due boycotting company wide.
YupRead the lawsuit. Here's the link: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23789600-file-stamped-disney-complaint1
Also, given how busy the parks have been, they're clearly not suffering.
Well, no - I don't think it's unreasonable to expect the jurors to make their decision based solely on the law - I mean, they are going to take a legal oath pledging to do just that.They also just announced $17 billion in investments in Florida over the next 10 years. Unreasonable to think that juries won’t side with Disney, aside from the reasons based in law.
To be fair no one who needed to see it reads the Orlando Sentinel, maybe they should have noticed it on Fox News or OANAh yes, the sneaky tactic of having publicly noticed, open to anyone meetings before the new bill had even been intorduced.
I think your definition of sneaky is very different than mine.
It's just Gary's alt accountThat poster has an obvious agenda.
Gawrsh, I hope the WDW boycott starts in early June. We get there June 16th!!I think Disney opened a bigger Pandora's Box by being sneaky to keep control of RCID. They acted like they were going accept it and than tried to keep it last minute with clever wording. I may be wrong but I don't think much would have changed if they had lost control of RCID. Now Disney has made DeSantis even more determined to crush The Mouse. It will probably cost Disney millions in lost revenue due boycotting company wide.
Did you not see the state moving to redefine regulation of transportation... the agendas on Disney content... the completely irrelevant COVID regulation... etc?I may be wrong but I don't think much would have changed if they had lost control of RCID.
Why are you surprised? The state (DeSantis, legislature, and the various people advising them) have been reacting in real time throughout this entire venture. They've yet to exhibit any semblance of anticipating the "opponent's" next move.I'm not shocked but somewhat surprised the lawyers for Florida and the board didn't have a response ready to go even if it was "we're not going to comment on pending litigation at this time"
They don't.Yes but there's probably going to be an injunction so I don't see how they can raise taxes when they have no power and how can RC be held accountable for the bills if the district is restored
The injunction wouldn't prevent the district from operating... it would constrain their actions - most probably around the actions defined in the contracts in dispute. And considering the new board is already in place and has already transitioned, it's unlikely the court would force them to go back in time and put the old board back. At best you might get some sort of receivership/proxy leadership while it's in dispute. But I think even that is far-fetched. I would expect any injunction to scope just the board from messing with the existing land management plan and force them not to pass any new resolutions that would be considered targeting disney specifically.Yes but there's probably going to be an injunction so I don't see how they can raise taxes when they have no power and how can RC be held accountable for the bills if the district is restored
The administration yes, the 800 per hour lawyers not so muchWhy are you surprised? The state (DeSantis, legislature, and the various people advising them) have been reacting in real time throughout this entire venture. They've yet to exhibit any semblance of anticipating the "opponent's" next move.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.