News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

flynnibus

Premium Member
so their lawyer is outlining 3 reasons the developer agreement is 'invalid'

1) the RCID board didn't have the planning authority over the cities... so the agreement is invalid
2) that they didn't follow the required procedures....
3) that the move was unconstiutional (state constitution)

supposedly these are outlined in detail in their handout
 

mkt

When a paradise is lost go straight to Disney™
Premium Member
Someone who enjoys Disney as a guest is less likely to come in with a "burn it to the ground" mindset. I'm not saying he was there for work, but it's good if he LIKES the parks.
I'm curious if credentialed RCID employees - which board members would qualify - get free admission, similar to CM's.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
You edited your post to add this text after I responded to it. 😒

To address your additional points...

Your original assertion is that losing the monorail would be a "cluster." Would transportation to/from MK be slower and/or less convenient for some resort guests? Probably. But there's enough alternative options that I still don't see how it's enough of a logistical nightmare to warrant being called a "cluster."

As for Epcot; there's already park bus infrastructure from the monorail resorts with routes to AK and HS, and Disney manages to add bus service to both Epcot and HS for the Skyliner resorts (which have significantly more guests than the monorail resorts) when that goes down, so I think they would manage just fine having to add a bus route to Epcot if the monorail went out of service.

So do I think there's zero impact if the monorails shut down? Of course not. I just don't think it becomes a "cluster" for Disney if the state decides to push things that far.
Disney will never pay to rebuild the monorail as currently constructed. Reedy creek’s loss only makes that more of a certainty.

When it goes…it’s gone
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
so their lawyer is outlining 3 reasons the developer agreement is 'invalid'

1) the RCID board didn't have the planning authority over the cities... so the agreement is invalid
2) that they didn't follow the required procedures....
3) that the move was unconstiutional (state constitution)

supposedly these are outlined in detail in their handout
You continue to give validity to people whose iqs and third from the right on the evolutionary chart
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I literally cannot believe they're still focused on COVID restrictions.
You wanna know why?

1682522330605.jpeg
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom