So, they’ve misrepresented that Disney and the District are involved in the process, presenting it as a problem. Now they acknowledge that they are not and want to interject themselves into it, the very thing they considered a problem. Is there no cognitive dissonance with the constant contradictions?
DeSantis was married at WDW.
During the public comment section, there were 5 speakers in a row from non-Disney small businesses in Disney Springs and the District saying how bad raising taxes would be for them.
Disney has fought and won the county property assessments from Orange & Osceola before. The difference can be in the millions.
Theres no point. Him reading this during the meeting means literally nothing. If he was presenting this to a court it might be different, but nothing he says here has any effect on contracts or agreements passed legally.
Sure - but it's the opposite here.. this is the board vilifying the lawsuits.
Yeah.... he is sooo borrrriiinngg
it sounds like he maybe trying to setup why they don't need to respect the 2022 comprehensive plan... but I had to turn off the audio when he started.. so I don't know if he actually outlined his concern at the start.
They can't just ignore a legal agreement. They have to go to court for that.
and coming from the guy who moments earlier could not open a PDF."that makes the amendment non-existent"
or....
It could be as simple as a IT error in what was put in the PDF. Notice he didn't mention actually talk to anyone in the process, he's citing purely based on the board packet history.. probably off the website
Elite lawyers tend not to be headquartered in offices on Lee Road.
